Scanned sites / seonix.ai / 2026-11-01-1245

seonix.ai scan from 2026-11-01 12:45:18 UTC DR 8

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-11-01-1245

Scanned 2026-11-01 12:45:18 UTC, finished 2026-11-01 12:49:27 UTC. Found with 42backlinks.com tool directory

Site: https://seonix.ai/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

94/ 100Excellent

On November 1, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 175 pages and 309 assets of seonix.ai, starting from https://seonix.ai/. It scored 94 out of 100, an excellent result. 3 of 32 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (93), heavy assets (2), title tags (3); 18 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−4.3), heavy assets (−1.2), title tags (−0.2). 11 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 5 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
175
Assets fetched
309
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
3 of 32
CoverageComplete crawl

484 of 484 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 37 link destinations on other sites have not been checked.

  • Title tags3 issues
    3 of 168 pages have title issues. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.2 points
  • Meta descriptions93 issues
    93 of 168 pages have meta description issues. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.3 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 168 pages have heading issues. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sitesNot checked
    Not checked: the crawl fetched nothing this check can look at.
  • RedirectsOK
    0 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responsesOK
    0 URLs did not return a 2xx response.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 168 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 7 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 1023 image references have no alt attribute. 62 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets2 issues
    2 assets larger than 500 KB among 309 fetched assets.
    −1.2 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverageOK
    1 sitemap listing 168 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
  • Internal link counts7 noted
    Internal link counts for 175 pages; 7 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 168 pages have fewer than 200 words. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format3 noted
    3 of 175 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals3 noted
    3 of 175 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives7 noted
    7 pages carry a robots directive; 168 carry none.
  • Anchor text2 noted
    2 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure41 noted
    41 of 168 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length89 noted
    81 images over 100 KB; 8 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 175 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    167 pages declare hreflang, with 464 annotations, and every one checks out.
  • Structured data36 noted
    168 of 168 indexable pages carry structured data: BreadcrumbList (166), ListItem (166), Organization (157), WebSite (157), WebPage (151). 36 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 168 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 175 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions9 noted
    9 of 168 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    2 pages in pagination sequences; 0 with problems.
  • Headers and cookies1 noted
    1 cookie set by the site, 1 missing a protective flag; 16 response headers recorded across 484 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 175 pages; 32 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling125 noted
    125 words an English dictionary does not know, on 93 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2457 sites, median 80%, average 78%

seonix.ai scores 94%, higher than 94% of the 2457 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0591170%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 9 sites53%: 7 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 28 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 36 sites69%: 48 sites70%: 47 sites71%: 72 sites72%: 72 sites73%: 72 sites74%: 71 sites75%: 75 sites76%: 88 sites77%: 97 sites78%: 111 sites79%: 95 sites80%: 117 sites81%: 110 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 110 sites84%: 113 sites85%: 93 sites86%: 73 sites87%: 79 sites88%: 60 sites89%: 69 sites90%: 43 sites91%: 51 sites92%: 39 sites93%: 26 sites94%: 21 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 14 sites97%: 14 sites98%: 6 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites94% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The website health is excellent, but there are issues with title tags, meta descriptions, and a few heavy assets that need attention. Improving these can enhance your SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Title Tag Issues

    Why: Correcting title tags can improve click-through rates and search visibility.

    How: Review the identified pages and optimize title tags to be unique and within recommended length (50-60 characters).

    Checks: titles

  2. 2

    Fix Meta Description Issues

    Why: Meta descriptions impact search result appearance, which affects click-through rates.

    How: Update the meta descriptions on the flagged pages to ensure they are unique and less than 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  3. 3

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Reducing large assets can improve page load speeds and user experience.

    How: Consider compressing the following assets to reduce size: https://seonix.ai/_next/static/chunks/3ojcp-3b6-tge.js (taskId: heavy-assets:b5zwzj), https://seonix.ai/_next/static/chunks/3trbozp4ocj0n.css (taskId: heavy-assets:lg0dwv).

    Evidence: 226 KB of script, loaded by 175 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    175 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

  4. 4

    Further Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Improving additional assets will further enhance load times.

    How: Compress the following heavy assets as well: https://seonix.ai/images/seo/seonix-article-editor-en.jpg (taskId: heavy-assets:jwn8zk) and https://seonix.ai/images/seo/seonix-article-editor-ua.jpg (taskId: heavy-assets:9r58wv).

    Evidence: 152 KB of image, loaded by 33 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    33 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several important security issues that need immediate attention. A cookie lacks protective flags, which could expose user data. The Content Security Policy is weak, allowing potentially harmful inline scripts. Sensitive paths are listed publicly, and server information is partially exposed in headers. Addressing these vulnerabilities will enhance the security of your site.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Cookie Lacks Protective FlagsMedium

    Why it matters: The cookie can be accessed by scripts, which increases the risk of cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.

    Fix: Set the cookie with HttpOnly, Secure, and SameSite attributes.

    Evidence: Cookie flags

  2. 2

    Weak Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: The policy allows inline scripts, which minimizes protection against cross-site scripting.

    Fix: Remove 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' from the script-src directive.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Server Information DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: The X-Powered-By header reveals the use of Next.js, which may assist attackers.

    Fix: Remove the X-Powered-By header or use a custom value to obscure the technology used.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  4. 4

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Publicly listing sensitive paths can guide attackers in probing for vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Restrict access to sensitive paths through appropriate authentication and authorization measures, not just robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundCookie flagsMedium

    1 of 1 cookie are missing protective flags. Without HttpOnly a script can read the cookie; without Secure it travels over plain HTTP; without SameSite it is sent on cross-site requests.

    • sx_consent_required (set by https://seonix.ai/) lacks HttpOnly
  • NoteContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, but it allows inline or eval scripts ('unsafe-inline' / 'unsafe-eval'), which removes most of its protection against injected scripts.

    • https://seonix.ai/ → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com https://connect.facebook.net https://*.clarity.ms https://c.bing.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick
    • https://seonix.ai/pricing → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com https://connect.facebook.net https://*.clarity.ms https://c.bing.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick
    • https://seonix.ai/blog → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com https://connect.facebook.net https://*.clarity.ms https://c.bing.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick
    • https://seonix.ai/docs/api → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com https://connect.facebook.net https://*.clarity.ms https://c.bing.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick
    • https://seonix.ai/start → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com https://connect.facebook.net https://*.clarity.ms https://c.bing.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick
    • https://seonix.ai/start?plan=starter&period=monthly → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com https://connect.facebook.net https://*.clarity.ms https://c.bing.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick
    • https://seonix.ai/how-it-works → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com https://connect.facebook.net https://*.clarity.ms https://c.bing.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick
    • https://seonix.ai/automated-seo → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com https://connect.facebook.net https://*.clarity.ms https://c.bing.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick
    • https://seonix.ai/integrations → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com https://connect.facebook.net https://*.clarity.ms https://c.bing.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick
    • https://seonix.ai/saas-seo → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com https://connect.facebook.net https://*.clarity.ms https://c.bing.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick
    • https://seonix.ai/custom-website-seo → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com https://connect.facebook.net https://*.clarity.ms https://c.bing.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick
    • https://seonix.ai/mcp → default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://ssl.google-analytics.com https://connect.facebook.net https://*.clarity.ms https://c.bing.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick
  • NoteSoftware version disclosure

    Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.

    • server: Vercel (484 responses)
    • x-powered-by: Next.js (53 responses)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 14 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /admin
    • Disallow: /admin/
    • Disallow: /admin
    • Disallow: /admin/
    • Disallow: /admin
    • Disallow: /admin/
    • Disallow: /admin
    • Disallow: /admin/
    • Disallow: /admin
    • Disallow: /admin/
    • Disallow: /admin
    • Disallow: /admin/
11 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 175 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 175 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 175 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 175 HTML pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    referrer-policy is set on all 175 HTML pages.

  • OKPermissions policy

    permissions-policy is set on all 175 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    11 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKThird-party scripts

    The sampled pages load no scripts from other domains.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near seonix.ai

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling seonix.ai from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own seonix.ai?