Scanned sites / secondcup.com

SEO report for secondcup.com DR 53

The latest Site Spider scan of secondcup.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/secondcup-com/2026-09-11-1301.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-11 13:01:41 UTC, finished 2026-09-11 13:30:06 UTC

Site: https://secondcup.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

84/ 100Good

On September 11, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 633 pages and 1016 assets of secondcup.com, starting from https://secondcup.com/. It scored 84 out of 100, a good result. 10 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (21), meta descriptions (396), title tags (176); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−5.6), title tags (−3.1). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
633
Assets fetched
1016
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
10 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

1,649 of 1,650 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt, 175 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 55 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags176 issues
    176 of 562 pages have title issues.
    −3.1 points
  • Meta descriptions396 issues
    396 of 562 pages have meta description issues.
    −5.6 points
  • Headings7 issues
    7 of 562 pages have heading issues.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken links11 issues
    304 internal links point at 11 broken URLs.
    −0.4 points
  • Links to other sites2,360 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 9 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 55 destinations checked.
  • Redirects50 issues
    52 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses20 issues
    73 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 71 of them are pages, 20 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.4 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 562 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt text41 issues
    41 of 9548 image references have no alt attribute. 3107 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets21 issues
    21 assets larger than 500 KB among 1016 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages16 issues
    16 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.1 points
  • Sitemap coverage30 issues
    6 sitemaps listing 570 URLs: 3 crawled pages missing, 10 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 17 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.3 points
  • Internal link counts14 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 14 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 562 pages have fewer than 200 words.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 633 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 562 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives562 noted
    562 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text368 noted
    368 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure330 noted
    330 of 562 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length8 noted
    8 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies7 noted
    7 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 562 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 1649 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 562 pages; 408 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 21 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

secondcup.com scores 84%, higher than 65% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites84% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Several issues need addressing to improve site performance, including broken links and title tag problems. Prioritize fixes for the most impactful areas.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Eliminating broken links improves user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify broken links from the crawl report and update or remove these links.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: Fixing URLs that do not return 2xx responses ensures better accessibility and SEO score.

    How: Check the URLs reported and redirect or correct them to ensure they return a 200 status.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Correct title issues to improve click-through rates and search visibility.

    How: Revise titles to meet length requirements (30-60 characters) and ensure they are unique.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Optimized meta descriptions enhance search engine results and can increase click rates.

    How: Rewrite meta descriptions to be within 70 characters and accurately reflect page content.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add Headings

    Why: Proper heading structure is crucial for SEO and usability.

    How: Ensure each page has a single H1 heading that summarizes the content.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Sitemap Coverage Issues

    Why: Fixing the sitemap ensures all pages are indexed correctly.

    How: Update sitemaps to remove broken URLs and add any missing pages.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website secondcup.com has several critical security deficiencies that need attention. Key issues include the absence of HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), Content Security Policy (CSP), Clickjacking protection, and MIME sniffing protection headers. These vulnerabilities expose users to interception, script injection, and clickjacking attacks. Immediate implementation of recommended security headers is necessary to enhance website security.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users may be intercepted on initial requests typed without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload to all HTML responses.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of CSP allows scripts from any source, increasing risk of cross-site scripting (XSS).

    Fix: Include a Content-Security-Policy header, e.g., Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' https://www.google.com; to restrict sources.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this, pages can be embedded in frames, risking clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN to prevent embedding on other sites.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Lack of this header risks executing files as scripts based on content rather than declared type.

    Fix: Add X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff to all HTML responses.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-party Scripts without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains can alter site behavior without integrity checks.

    Fix: Implement a Content-Security-Policy that restricts script sources and includes hosts like interfaces.zapier.com and www.google.com.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Sensitive paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Listing private paths in robots.txt could provide a map for attackers.

    Fix: Ensure access control on sensitive paths like /wp-admin/ rather than relying on robots.txt to obscure them.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://secondcup.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://secondcup.com/club-cafe/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/boissons/lattes-et-espressos/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/boissons/sur-glace/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/boissons/melanges-glaces/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/boissons/infusions-a-froid/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/boissons/cafe-et-the-infuses/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/boissons/thes-lattes/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/boissons/chocolat-chaud/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/smoothies/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/produits-alimentaires/boulangerie/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/produits-alimentaires/dejeuner/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 562 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://secondcup.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://secondcup.com/club-cafe/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/boissons/lattes-et-espressos/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/boissons/sur-glace/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/boissons/melanges-glaces/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/boissons/infusions-a-froid/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/boissons/cafe-et-the-infuses/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/boissons/thes-lattes/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/boissons/chocolat-chaud/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/smoothies/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/produits-alimentaires/boulangerie/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/produits-alimentaires/dejeuner/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://secondcup.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://secondcup.com/club-cafe/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/boissons/lattes-et-espressos/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/boissons/sur-glace/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/boissons/melanges-glaces/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/boissons/infusions-a-froid/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/boissons/cafe-et-the-infuses/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/boissons/thes-lattes/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/boissons/chocolat-chaud/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/smoothies/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/produits-alimentaires/boulangerie/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/produits-alimentaires/dejeuner/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://secondcup.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://secondcup.com/club-cafe/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/boissons/lattes-et-espressos/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/boissons/sur-glace/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/boissons/melanges-glaces/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/boissons/infusions-a-froid/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/boissons/cafe-et-the-infuses/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/boissons/thes-lattes/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/boissons/chocolat-chaud/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/smoothies/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/produits-alimentaires/boulangerie/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://secondcup.com/menu-complet/produits-alimentaires/dejeuner/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • interfaces.zapier.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (39 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 562 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    3 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of secondcup.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near secondcup.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling secondcup.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own secondcup.com?