Scanned sites / evergreenveterinaryclinic.net

SEO report for evergreenveterinaryclinic.net DR 7

The latest Site Spider scan of evergreenveterinaryclinic.net, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/evergreenveterinaryclinic-net/2026-09-10-0852.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-10 08:52:40 UTC, finished 2026-09-10 14:02:46 UTC

Site: https://evergreenveterinaryclinic.net/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

84/ 100Good

On September 10, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 19 pages and 236 assets of evergreenveterinaryclinic.net, starting from https://evergreenveterinaryclinic.net/. It scored 84 out of 100, a good result. 6 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (12), title tags (9), sitemap coverage (7); 13 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), title tags (−4.7), sitemap coverage (−2.2). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
19
Assets fetched
236
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
6 of 26
CoverageComplete crawl

255 of 257 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 7 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags9 issues
    9 of 19 pages have title issues.
    −4.7 points
  • Meta descriptions1 issue
    1 of 19 pages have meta description issues.
    −0.4 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 19 pages have heading issues.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites75 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 4 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 7 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 noted
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses3 noted
    3 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 0 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 19 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 31 image references have no alt attribute. 2 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets12 issues
    12 assets larger than 500 KB among 236 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages7 issues
    7 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −1.5 points
  • Sitemap coverage7 issues
    2 sitemaps listing 19 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 7 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2.2 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 19 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content3 issues
    3 of 19 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −1.3 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 19 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 19 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives19 noted
    19 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure2 noted
    2 of 19 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length6 noted
    6 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 19 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 255 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 19 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2315 sites, median 79%, average 78%

evergreenveterinaryclinic.net scores 84%, higher than 69% of the 2315 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 34 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 98 sites84%: 108 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 62 sites90%: 35 sites91%: 44 sites92%: 37 sites93%: 23 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites84% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The site has a good health score of 84/100, but some issues need attention. Prioritized fixes involve correcting redirects, status codes, optimizing titles and meta descriptions, and addressing thin content and orphan pages.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: One redirecting URL can affect user experience and SEO.

    How: Change URL to avoid redirecting. Update internal links to point directly to the final destination.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Three URLs not returning a 2xx response can hurt site accessibility.

    How: Identify why they do not respond correctly and fix broken links or update the status where necessary.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Nine pages with title issues can hinder search engine visibility.

    How: Shorten title tags to under 60 characters while retaining key information.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Enhance Meta Description

    Why: A short meta description can reduce click-through rates.

    How: Rewrite the meta description to be at least 70 characters long, describing the content effectively.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Improve Thin Content

    Why: Three pages have thin content, impacting search engine rankings.

    How: Expand content to have at least 200 words, providing detailed information relevant to the topic.

    Checks: thin-content

  6. 6

    Link Orphan Pages Internally

    Why: Seven pages lack internal links, making them harder to find.

    How: Add links in relevant content to these pages, ensuring they can be discovered and indexed.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lacks a Content Security Policy, making it vulnerable to certain types of attacks. Additionally, third-party scripts are used without integrity checks, increasing security risks. Sensitive directory paths are revealed in robots.txt, which could aid attackers in probing efforts.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: The absence of a Content Security Policy allows any script to load, increasing the risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Implement a Content-Security-Policy header with appropriate directives, e.g., "Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';".

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Lack of Subresource Integrity on Third-party ScriptsLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains can be compromised, leading to riskier operations on your site.

    Fix: Add Subresource Integrity (SRI) attributes to the script tags for scripts from www.googletagmanager.com and www.google.com.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  3. 3

    Sensitive Paths Revealed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file reveals sensitive paths that could assist malicious users in targeting the site.

    Fix: Update the robots.txt file to remove sensitive paths or implement proper access controls on those directories.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 19 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://evergreenveterinaryclinic.net/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://evergreenveterinaryclinic.net/about-evergreen-veterinary-clinic/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://evergreenveterinaryclinic.net/veterinarian-saskatoon-sk/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://evergreenveterinaryclinic.net/evergreen-veterinary-clinic-gallery/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://evergreenveterinaryclinic.net/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://evergreenveterinaryclinic.net/faqs/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://evergreenveterinaryclinic.net/saskatoon-sk-veterinary-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://evergreenveterinaryclinic.net/surgical-consent-form/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://evergreenveterinaryclinic.net/new-client-form/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://evergreenveterinaryclinic.net/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://evergreenveterinaryclinic.net/privacy-policy/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://evergreenveterinaryclinic.net/accessibility-statement/ → no content-security-policy
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (19 script tags)
    • www.google.com (3 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
10 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 19 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 19 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 19 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 19 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    3 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of evergreenveterinaryclinic.net

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near evergreenveterinaryclinic.net

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling evergreenveterinaryclinic.net from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own evergreenveterinaryclinic.net?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming evergreenveterinaryclinic.net. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.