Scanned sites / saskatoonsmilesgroup.com / 2026-09-14-0859

saskatoonsmilesgroup.com scan from 2026-09-14 08:59:25 UTC DR 8

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-14-0859

Scanned 2026-09-14 08:59:25 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 09:21:45 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

82/ 100Good

On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 153 pages and 1000 assets of saskatoonsmilesgroup.com, starting from https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/. It scored 82 out of 100, a good result. 6 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (12), sitemap coverage (127), title tags (43); 10 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), sitemap coverage (−5.6), title tags (−3.1). 11 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
153
Assets fetched
1000
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
6 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

1,153 of 1,153 discovered URLs were fetched, 128 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 21 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags43 issues
    43 of 127 pages have title issues. 10 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.1 points
  • Meta descriptions34 issues
    34 of 127 pages have meta description issues. 10 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 127 pages have heading issues. 10 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites551 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 7 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 20 destinations checked.
  • Redirects16 issues
    17 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.5 points
  • Non-200 responses17 noted
    17 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 16 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability10 issues
    10 of 137 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.7 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 2015 image references have no alt attribute. 1084 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets12 issues
    12 assets larger than 500 KB among 1000 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage127 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 127 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −5.6 points
  • Internal link counts24 noted
    Internal link counts for 137 pages; 24 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 127 pages have fewer than 200 words. 10 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 153 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals10 noted
    10 of 137 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives137 noted
    137 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text99 noted
    99 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure30 noted
    30 of 127 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 10 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length49 noted
    49 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 137 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 1153 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 137 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 62 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

saskatoonsmilesgroup.com scores 82%, higher than 56% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites82% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The site has some significant SEO issues, particularly with redirects, title tags, and sitemap coverage. Addressing these will enhance user experience and improve search engine visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects and Non-200 Responses

    Why: Redirects and non-200 responses can confuse search engines and users, impacting SEO negatively.

    How: Update or remove the problematic URLs to ensure they return a 200 status code.

    Checks: redirects, status-codes

  2. 2

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Overly long titles hinder search visibility and user engagement.

    How: Shorten titles to under 60 characters for all affected pages.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Long or missing meta descriptions can reduce click-through rates from search results.

    How: Revise meta descriptions to be under 160 characters and ensure all pages have one.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Update Sitemap to Include All Pages

    Why: A complete sitemap ensures all indexable pages are recognized by search engines.

    How: Include all crawled pages in the sitemap and submit it to search engines.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  5. 5

    Address Indexability Warnings

    Why: Indexability issues can prevent important content from being indexed.

    How: Ensure canonical tags correctly point to the intended pages, especially for paginated content.

    Checks: indexability

  6. 6

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Heavy assets can slow down page loading times, affecting user experience.

    How: Compress images and reduce their sizes while maintaining quality.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several security vulnerabilities that could expose it to various attacks. Immediate attention is needed to implement HTTP Strict Transport Security, Content Security Policy, and Clickjacking protection. Additionally, an upgrade of the Bootstrap library is necessary to mitigate known vulnerabilities. Addressing these issues will significantly strengthen the site's security posture.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors can be intercepted on initial requests not using HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of a CSP allows unrestricted loading of scripts, styles, and frames.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: No X-Frame-Options means pages can be embedded in frames, risking overlay attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Outdated Bootstrap LibraryMedium

    Why it matters: Bootstrap 3.3.7 has known vulnerabilities that could be exploitable depending on site usage.

    Fix: Upgrade Bootstrap to version 3.4.1 or later.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Without this protection, browsers may incorrectly execute files based on their content.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  6. 6

    Missing Subresource Integrity on Third-party ScriptsLow

    Why it matters: Third-party scripts from external domains pose a risk if compromised.

    Fix: Consider adding SRI attributes or implementing a CSP that allows only known safe sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/dental-services-saskatoon/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/dental-cleanings-exams/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/endodontics/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/invisalign/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/laser-dentistry/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/mouth-guards/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/oral-surgery/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/teeth-whitening/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/tooth-extractions/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/botox-dysport/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/braces/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 137 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/dental-services-saskatoon/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/dental-cleanings-exams/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/endodontics/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/invisalign/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/laser-dentistry/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/mouth-guards/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/oral-surgery/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/teeth-whitening/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/tooth-extractions/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/botox-dysport/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/braces/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/dental-services-saskatoon/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/dental-cleanings-exams/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/endodontics/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/invisalign/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/laser-dentistry/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/mouth-guards/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/oral-surgery/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/teeth-whitening/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/tooth-extractions/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/botox-dysport/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/braces/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/dental-services-saskatoon/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/dental-cleanings-exams/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/endodontics/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/invisalign/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/laser-dentistry/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/mouth-guards/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/oral-surgery/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/teeth-whitening/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/tooth-extractions/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/botox-dysport/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/service/braces/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: Bootstrap 3.3.7. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • Bootstrap 3.3.7 in https://saskatoonsmilesgroup.com/wp-content/themes/dental-care/js/bootstrap.min…: CVE-2016-10735, CVE-2018-14040, CVE-2018-14041, CVE-2018-14042, CVE-2019-8331 (XSS through data attributes in tooltip, popover, collapse and scrollspy); fixed in 3.4.1
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.google.com (40 script tags)
    • cdn.trustindex.io (1 script tag)
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 137 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    81 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near saskatoonsmilesgroup.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling saskatoonsmilesgroup.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own saskatoonsmilesgroup.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming saskatoonsmilesgroup.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.