Scanned sites / evergreenlandscape.ca

SEO report for evergreenlandscape.ca DR 3

The latest Site Spider scan of evergreenlandscape.ca, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/evergreenlandscape-ca/2026-09-14-0317.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-14 03:17:44 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 03:54:42 UTC. Found on page 5 of brave web search results

Site: https://evergreenlandscape.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

82/ 100Good

On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 17 pages and 1165 assets of evergreenlandscape.ca, starting from https://evergreenlandscape.ca/. It scored 82 out of 100, a good result. 7 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (591), meta descriptions (10), thin content (4); 10 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−5.3), thin content (−2.1). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
17
Assets fetched
1165
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
7 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

1,182 of 1,191 discovered URLs were fetched, 8 blocked by robots.txt, 162 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 9 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags3 issues
    3 of 14 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −2 points
  • Meta descriptions10 issues
    10 of 14 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −5.3 points
  • Headings3 issues
    3 of 14 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −1.2 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites34 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 5 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 9 destinations checked.
  • Redirects3 noted
    3 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses3 noted
    3 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 2 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 14 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 133 image references have no alt attribute. 44 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets591 issues
    591 assets larger than 500 KB among 1165 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.3 points
  • Sitemap coverage4 issues
    6 sitemaps listing 17 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 3 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.6 points
  • Internal link counts2 noted
    Internal link counts for 15 pages; 2 worth a look.
  • Thin content4 issues
    4 of 14 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −2.1 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 17 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 15 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives15 noted
    15 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text4 noted
    4 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure4 noted
    4 of 14 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length24 noted
    24 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 15 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 14 response headers recorded across 1182 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 15 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 69 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

evergreenlandscape.ca scores 82%, higher than 56% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites82% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Several issues detected on your site need fixing to improve SEO performance. Prioritize resolving redirects, non-200 responses, and optimizing title tags, meta descriptions, and headings.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirects can hinder user experience and SEO.

    How: Remove unnecessary redirects to improve direct access to pages.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Non-200 responses can negatively impact site accessibility.

    How: Ensure the listed URLs return a 2xx response instead of 301.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Long title tags can limit visibility in search results.

    How: Shorten titles to within 60 characters for key pages.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Address Meta Description Issues

    Why: Missing or lengthy meta descriptions can reduce click-through rates.

    How: Add meta descriptions, keeping them under 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add Missing Headings

    Why: Missing H1 tags can affect content structure and SEO.

    How: Include a relevant H1 heading on pages lacking one.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Enhance Thin Content

    Why: Pages with low word counts may rank poorly.

    How: Increase content to at least 200 words on thin content pages.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security weaknesses, including missing headers and outdated libraries. Implementing HTTP Strict Transport Security and a Content Security Policy are important to protect users. Upgrading jQuery and addressing robots.txt exposures can also strengthen your site significantly.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, initial connections can be intercepted.

    Fix: Add 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload' to headers.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of CSP allows potential cross-site scripting and data injection vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Include 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';' in headers.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Outdated jQuery LibraryMedium

    Why it matters: Using jQuery 1.12.4 has known vulnerabilities that might be exploitable.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  4. 4

    Third-Party Scripts without Subresource Integrity (SRI)Low

    Why it matters: Third-party scripts can change without warning, compromising site security.

    Fix: Use Subresource Integrity for third-party scripts or implement a CSP that restricts script sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The listed paths may expose sensitive areas of your site.

    Fix: Ensure proper access controls for /wp-admin/, /wp-login.php, and /wp-includes/.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://evergreenlandscape.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://evergreenlandscape.ca/about/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://evergreenlandscape.ca/awards-recognition/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://evergreenlandscape.ca/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://evergreenlandscape.ca/services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://evergreenlandscape.ca/portfolio/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://evergreenlandscape.ca/contact/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://evergreenlandscape.ca/blogs/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://evergreenlandscape.ca/privacy-policy/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://evergreenlandscape.ca/terms-of-service/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://evergreenlandscape.ca/hardscapes-that-transform-your-yard-patios-walkways-retaining-walls/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://evergreenlandscape.ca/seasonal-landscaping-guide-what-to-do-every-quarter/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 15 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://evergreenlandscape.ca/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://evergreenlandscape.ca/about/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://evergreenlandscape.ca/awards-recognition/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://evergreenlandscape.ca/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://evergreenlandscape.ca/services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://evergreenlandscape.ca/portfolio/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://evergreenlandscape.ca/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://evergreenlandscape.ca/blogs/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://evergreenlandscape.ca/privacy-policy/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://evergreenlandscape.ca/terms-of-service/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://evergreenlandscape.ca/hardscapes-that-transform-your-yard-patios-walkways-retaining-walls/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://evergreenlandscape.ca/seasonal-landscaping-guide-what-to-do-every-quarter/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.12.4. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.12.4 in https://evergreenlandscape.ca/wp-content/plugins/dethemekit-for-elementor/asset…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.google.com (3 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 3 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-login.php
    • Disallow: /wp-includes/
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 15 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 15 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 15 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    3 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of evergreenlandscape.ca

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near evergreenlandscape.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling evergreenlandscape.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own evergreenlandscape.ca?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming evergreenlandscape.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.