Scanned sites / www.so-good.at

SEO report for www.so-good.at DR 26

The latest Site Spider scan of www.so-good.at, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/www-so--good-at/2026-10-21-1253.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-10-21 12:53:01 UTC, finished 2026-10-21 13:35:11 UTC

Site: https://www.so-good.at/info/hochzeitsband-kaernten/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

74/ 100Needs work

On October 21, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 427 pages and 1767 assets of www.so-good.at, starting from https://www.so-good.at/info/hochzeitsband-kaernten/. It scored 74 out of 100, a result that needs work. 12 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (353), heavy assets (163), sitemap coverage (353); 11 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6.8), heavy assets (−6), sitemap coverage (−5.1). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 3 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
427
Assets fetched
1767
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 33
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

2,194 of 2,195 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 failed, 3,360 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 193 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags195 issues
    195 of 353 pages have title issues. 65 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.7 points
  • Meta descriptions353 issues
    353 of 353 pages have meta description issues. 65 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.8 points
  • Headings8 issues
    8 of 353 pages have heading issues. 65 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken links4 issues
    8 internal links point at 4 broken URLs.
    −0.2 points
  • Links to other sites22 issues
    22 destinations answered with an error, 41 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 193 destinations checked.
    −2.1 points
  • Redirects6 issues
    7 redirecting URLs, 1 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses4 issues
    11 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 10 of them are pages, 4 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability7 issues
    7 of 359 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 59 pages noindex by design.
    −0.2 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 4763 image references have no alt attribute. 2818 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets163 issues
    163 assets larger than 500 KB among 1767 fetched assets. 2 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage353 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 353 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −5.1 points
  • Internal link counts193 noted
    Internal link counts for 418 pages; 193 worth a look.
  • Thin content47 issues
    47 of 353 pages have fewer than 200 words. 65 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.9 points
  • Duplicate content3 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.1 points
  • URL format9 noted
    9 of 427 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals66 noted
    66 of 418 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives59 noted
    59 pages carry a robots directive; 359 carry none.
  • Anchor text289 noted
    289 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure269 noted
    269 of 353 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 65 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length643 noted
    642 images over 100 KB; 1 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validation418 noted
    418 of 418 pages have HTML problems: 418 with head tags outside <head>, 0 over 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured dataOK
    418 of 353 indexable pages carry structured data: WebPage (418), WPHeader (418), SiteNavigationElement (418), WPFooter (418), ImageObject (388). 0 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 353 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 418 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions3 noted
    3 of 353 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    No page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 2194 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 418 pages; 324 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingOK
    No unfamiliar lower-case words on 353 pages (English pages only).

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2305 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.so-good.at scores 74%, higher than 29% of the 2305 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581160%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 16 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 34 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 43 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 68 sites74%: 69 sites75%: 71 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 91 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 106 sites82%: 116 sites83%: 97 sites84%: 108 sites85%: 86 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 62 sites90%: 33 sites91%: 45 sites92%: 36 sites93%: 20 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 11 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites74% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The site has several critical issues to address, including broken links, a missing sitemap, and problems with titles and meta descriptions. Prioritizing these fixes will help improve user experience and SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links negatively impact user experience and SEO.

    How: Repair or remove the internal links pointing to broken URLs.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 3

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: Issues with titles can harm click-through rates and SEO.

    How: Revise the titles of the 195 affected pages to ensure they are appropriately sized and descriptive.

    Checks: titles

  3. 4

    Add Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions are crucial for search visibility.

    How: Craft and apply meta descriptions for all 353 pages where missing.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 5

    Address Redirects

    Why: Chained redirects can slow down page load times and dilute link equity.

    How: Eliminate unnecessary redirects and ensure they point directly to the final URL.

    Checks: redirects

  5. 6

    Reduce Heavy Assets

    Why: Large assets can slow down page loading speeds, affecting user experience.

    How: Optimize images and documents exceeding 500 KB to improve performance.

    Evidence: 700 KB of image, loaded by 17 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    17 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several critical security headers missing, which exposes it to interception, clickjacking, and script injection attacks. Implementing the recommended headers can significantly enhance security and protect users' data.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 3 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors may be intercepted on initial HTTP requests.

    Fix: Add the header 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains' to the server response.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of CSP allows loading resources from any source, increasing risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add a header 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';' to limit resource loading.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of this header allows potential clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' to prevent framing.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Not having this header allows browsers to interpret files as scripts based on content.

    Fix: Add the header 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' to improve security.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Missing Referrer-Policy HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this policy, full URLs are passed to third-party sites when navigating.

    Fix: Add the header 'Referrer-Policy: no-referrer-when-downgrade' to protect user privacy.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  6. 6

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Revealing server software versions increases the risk of targeted attacks based on known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Consider configuring the server to not disclose version details in headers.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  7. 7

    Missing Permissions-Policy HeaderInfo

    Why it matters: This header controls access to browser features, mitigating risks of unauthorized script actions.

    Fix: Add the header 'Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(), microphone=(), camera=()' to restrict features.

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.so-good.at/info/hochzeitsband-kaernten/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.so-good.at/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.so-good.at/blog/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/repertoire/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/referenzen/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/demosongs/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/anlaesse/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.so-good.at/besetzung/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.so-good.at/kontakt/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.so-good.at/info/hochzeitsband-oberoesterreich/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.so-good.at/info/tanzmusik-hochzeit/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 418 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.so-good.at/info/hochzeitsband-kaernten/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/repertoire/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/referenzen/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/demosongs/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/anlaesse/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/besetzung/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/kontakt/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/info/hochzeitsband-oberoesterreich/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/info/tanzmusik-hochzeit/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.so-good.at/info/hochzeitsband-kaernten/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.so-good.at/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.so-good.at/blog/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/repertoire/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/referenzen/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/demosongs/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/anlaesse/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.so-good.at/besetzung/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.so-good.at/kontakt/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.so-good.at/info/hochzeitsband-oberoesterreich/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.so-good.at/info/tanzmusik-hochzeit/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.so-good.at/info/hochzeitsband-kaernten/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.so-good.at/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.so-good.at/blog/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/repertoire/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/referenzen/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/demosongs/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/anlaesse/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.so-good.at/besetzung/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.so-good.at/kontakt/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.so-good.at/info/hochzeitsband-oberoesterreich/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.so-good.at/info/tanzmusik-hochzeit/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.so-good.at/info/hochzeitsband-kaernten/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/blog/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/repertoire/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/referenzen/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/demosongs/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/anlaesse/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/besetzung/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/kontakt/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/info/hochzeitsband-oberoesterreich/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/info/tanzmusik-hochzeit/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.so-good.at/info/hochzeitsband-kaernten/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/blog/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/repertoire/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/referenzen/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/demosongs/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/details/anlaesse/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/besetzung/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/kontakt/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/info/hochzeitsband-oberoesterreich/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.so-good.at/info/tanzmusik-hochzeit/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: Apache (2194 responses)
    • x-powered-by: PHP/8.3.33 (430 responses)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 418 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    12 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKThird-party scripts

    The sampled pages load no scripts from other domains.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of www.so-good.at

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near www.so-good.at

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.so-good.at from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.so-good.at?