Scanned sites / royaltattooyyc.com

SEO report for royaltattooyyc.com DR 4

The latest Site Spider scan of royaltattooyyc.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/royaltattooyyc-com/2026-09-12-0432.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-12 04:32:49 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 06:12:35 UTC

Site: https://royaltattooyyc.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

85/ 100Good

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 47 pages and 329 assets of royaltattooyyc.com, starting from https://royaltattooyyc.com/. It scored 85 out of 100, a good result. 7 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (24), title tags (9), thin content (9); 12 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6.2), title tags (−2.9), thin content (−2.3). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
47
Assets fetched
329
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
7 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

376 of 376 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 9 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags9 issues
    9 of 31 pages have title issues.
    −2.9 points
  • Meta descriptions24 issues
    24 of 31 pages have meta description issues.
    −6.2 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 31 pages have heading issues.
    −0.4 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites60 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 4 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 7 destinations checked.
  • Redirects16 issues
    16 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −2.1 points
  • Non-200 responses83 noted
    83 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 16 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 31 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 126 image references have no alt attribute. 8 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 329 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pages4 issues
    4 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.5 points
  • Sitemap coverage4 issues
    7 sitemaps listing 30 URLs: 1 crawled page missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 3 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.8 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 31 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content9 issues
    9 of 31 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −2.3 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 47 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 31 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives31 noted
    31 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text16 noted
    16 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure11 noted
    11 of 31 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies16 noted
    16 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 31 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 376 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 31 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 52 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

royaltattooyyc.com scores 85%, higher than 70% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites85% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has a good health score, but several technical SEO issues need addressing, especially with redirects, titles, and meta descriptions. Focus on fixing the most impactful changes first.

  1. 1

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: 83 URLs returned errors, affecting user experience and SEO.

    How: Review all 83 problematic URLs and ensure they return 200 responses. Redirects should point to existing pages properly.

    Checks: status-codes

  2. 2

    Update Title Tags

    Why: 9 pages have title problems, impacting search visibility.

    How: Revise titles to be unique and descriptive, ideally under 60 characters, ensuring no duplicates.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Add or Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 11 pages are missing or have poor meta descriptions; this may lower click-through rates.

    How: Craft unique meta descriptions for all affected pages, keeping them under 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Resolve Redirect Issues

    Why: 16 URLs are redirecting, which can slow down site performance.

    How: Confirm that redirects are necessary and streamline where possible. Avoid irrelevant redirect chains.

    Checks: redirects

  5. 5

    Fix Multiple H1 Headings

    Why: 2 pages have multiple H1s, which is a violation of HTML standards.

    How: Ensure each page only has one H1 tag while organizing additional headings hierarchically.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Link Orphan Pages Internally

    Why: 4 pages have no internal links, limiting discoverability.

    How: Add internal links to these orphan pages from relevant pages to improve their visibility.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lacks critical security headers, making it vulnerable to various attacks such as interception and clickjacking. Immediate implementation of HTTP Strict Transport Security, Content Security Policy, and X-Frame-Options is essential to enhance security.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users entering the site via HTTP can be intercepted on their first request.

    Fix: Implement HSTS by adding the header 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includesubdomains; preload'.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows unrestricted loading of potentially malicious scripts and styles.

    Fix: Add a Content Security Policy header, e.g., 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google.com;'.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, pages can be embedded in malicious iframes, leading to clickjacking risks.

    Fix: Add 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' or 'X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN' to your responses.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains can be modified by attackers, impacting site security.

    Fix: Consider using Subresource Integrity or restrict origins in the CSP to mitigate risks from third-party scripts.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file exposes sensitive URLs, potentially aiding attackers.

    Fix: Ensure real access control for sensitive paths like /wp-admin/ instead of relying on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/tattoo-artists/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/alex-colour-realism-tattoos/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/arhat-realism-tattoos/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/brandon-dark-art-tattoos/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/cam-american-traditional-tattoos/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/cassidy-neotraditional-tattoos/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/jesse-illustrative-tattoos/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/kat-watercolour-tattoos/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/kaylie-fineline-tattoos/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/mariia-realism-tattoos/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/ryan-black-and-grey-realism/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 31 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/tattoo-artists/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/alex-colour-realism-tattoos/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/arhat-realism-tattoos/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/brandon-dark-art-tattoos/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/cam-american-traditional-tattoos/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/cassidy-neotraditional-tattoos/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/jesse-illustrative-tattoos/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/kat-watercolour-tattoos/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/kaylie-fineline-tattoos/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/mariia-realism-tattoos/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/ryan-black-and-grey-realism/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/tattoo-artists/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/alex-colour-realism-tattoos/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/arhat-realism-tattoos/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/brandon-dark-art-tattoos/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/cam-american-traditional-tattoos/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/cassidy-neotraditional-tattoos/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/jesse-illustrative-tattoos/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/kat-watercolour-tattoos/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/kaylie-fineline-tattoos/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/mariia-realism-tattoos/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://royaltattooyyc.com/ryan-black-and-grey-realism/ → no x-frame-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (62 script tags)
    • www.google.com (2 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 31 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 31 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    7 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of royaltattooyyc.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near royaltattooyyc.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling royaltattooyyc.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own royaltattooyyc.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming royaltattooyyc.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.