Scanned sites / rockpapercoffee.com

SEO report for rockpapercoffee.com DR 6

The latest Site Spider scan of rockpapercoffee.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/rockpapercoffee-com/2026-09-12-1946.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-12 19:46:57 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 21:16:24 UTC. Found on page 5 of brave web search results

Site: https://rockpapercoffee.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

85/ 100Good

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 79 pages and 433 assets of rockpapercoffee.com, starting from https://rockpapercoffee.com/. It scored 85 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (41), meta descriptions (26), broken links (5); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−3.1), broken links (−1.5). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
79
Assets fetched
433
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

512 of 513 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 20 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags7 issues
    7 of 63 pages have title issues. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1 points
  • Meta descriptions26 issues
    26 of 63 pages have meta description issues. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.1 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 63 pages have heading issues. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.2 points
  • Broken links5 issues
    72 internal links point at 5 broken URLs.
    −1.5 points
  • Links to other sites2 issues
    2 destinations answered with an error, 3 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 20 destinations checked.
    −0.8 points
  • Redirects6 issues
    8 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses5 issues
    13 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 12 of them are pages, 5 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.7 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 63 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 4 pages noindex by design. 2 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −0.3 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 504 image references have no alt attribute. 20 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets41 issues
    41 assets larger than 500 KB among 433 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages2 issues
    2 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.1 points
  • Sitemap coverage8 issues
    7 sitemaps listing 62 URLs: 4 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.7 points
  • Internal link counts3 noted
    Internal link counts for 67 pages; 3 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 63 pages have fewer than 200 words. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 79 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals4 noted
    4 of 67 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives67 noted
    67 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text73 noted
    73 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure4 noted
    4 of 63 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length31 noted
    31 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 67 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 14 response headers recorded across 512 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 67 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 64 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

rockpapercoffee.com scores 85%, higher than 70% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites85% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

To improve site performance, address broken links, non-200 responses, and SEO issues with titles and meta descriptions, as well as orphan pages. These will enhance user experience and search visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links create 404 errors and negatively impact user experience.

    How: Update or remove 72 internal links pointing to broken URLs listed in the 'Broken links' report.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Non-200 responses hinder site navigation and indexing.

    How: Inspect and fix 13 URLs that don't return a 2xx status code from the 'Non-200 responses' report.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Enhance Title Tags

    Why: Improving titles can boost click-through rates and SEO performance.

    How: Revise 7 title tags as reported in 'Title tags' to ensure they are longer than 30 characters.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Add Missing Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions significantly influence search engine result placements.

    How: Create and implement meta descriptions for the 17 pages noted in 'Meta descriptions' that are missing these elements.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Link to Orphan Pages

    Why: Orphan pages are hard to discover, limiting traffic and SEO benefits.

    How: Add internal links pointing to the 2 orphan pages from relevant site locations.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  6. 6

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Heavy assets can slow down page loading times, affecting user experience.

    How: Compress or replace 41 assets larger than 500 KB as found in the 'Heavy assets' report.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site rockpapercoffee.com lacks important security headers that protect against various attacks. Implementing HTTP Strict Transport Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is essential to enhance visitor safety. Additionally, sensitive paths in the robots.txt file should be properly secured.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors typing the address without HTTPS can be intercepted.

    Fix: Add 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload' to the response headers.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, your pages can be embedded in frames on other sites, allowing clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' to the response headers.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may misinterpret a file's content type, leading to security issues.

    Fix: Add 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' to the response headers.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  4. 4

    Sensitive Paths Listed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The public list of paths can inform attackers about sensitive areas of the site.

    Fix: Restrict access to /wp-admin/ using real access controls rather than relying on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/shop/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/our-brand/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/my-account/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/product-category/whole-bean/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/product-category/ground/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/product-category/single-serve/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/subscription/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/wholesale/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/our-coffee/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/fundraising/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/contact/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    2 of 67 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/shop/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/our-brand/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/product-category/whole-bean/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/product-category/ground/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/product-category/single-serve/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/subscription/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/wholesale/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/our-coffee/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/fundraising/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/contact/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/product/sask-medium-roast-ground/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/shop/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/our-brand/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/my-account/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/product-category/whole-bean/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/product-category/ground/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/product-category/single-serve/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/subscription/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/wholesale/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/our-coffee/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/fundraising/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://rockpapercoffee.com/contact/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
9 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 67 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    161 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKThird-party scripts

    The sampled pages load no scripts from other domains.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of rockpapercoffee.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near rockpapercoffee.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling rockpapercoffee.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own rockpapercoffee.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming rockpapercoffee.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.