Scanned sites / roofcatroofing.ca

SEO report for roofcatroofing.ca DR 1

The latest Site Spider scan of roofcatroofing.ca, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/roofcatroofing-ca/2026-09-10-0747.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-10 07:47:45 UTC, finished 2026-09-10 10:47:26 UTC

Site: https://roofcatroofing.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

78/ 100Good

On September 10, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 36 pages and 94 assets of roofcatroofing.ca, starting from https://roofcatroofing.ca/. It scored 78 out of 100, a good result. 12 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (17), links to other sites (7), sitemap coverage (11); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−4.7), links to other sites (−2.8), sitemap coverage (−2.3). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
36
Assets fetched
94
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

130 of 130 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 47 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags6 issues
    6 of 29 pages have title issues.
    −2.1 points
  • Meta descriptions17 issues
    17 of 29 pages have meta description issues.
    −4.7 points
  • Headings10 issues
    10 of 29 pages have heading issues.
    −2.1 points
  • Broken links3 issues
    3 internal links point at 3 broken URLs.
    −2.1 points
  • Links to other sites7 issues
    7 destinations answered with an error, 16 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 47 destinations checked.
    −2.8 points
  • Redirects4 issues
    5 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.6 points
  • Non-200 responses3 issues
    8 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 7 of them are pages, 3 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 29 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 80 image references have no alt attribute. 9 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets3 issues
    3 assets larger than 500 KB among 94 fetched assets.
    −1.8 points
  • Orphan pages11 issues
    11 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −1.5 points
  • Sitemap coverage11 issues
    4 sitemaps listing 29 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 11 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2.3 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 29 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content2 issues
    2 of 29 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −0.6 points
  • Duplicate content3 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.8 points
  • URL format3 noted
    3 of 36 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 29 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives29 noted
    29 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text3 noted
    3 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure6 noted
    6 of 29 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length6 noted
    6 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 29 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 130 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 29 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 59 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2315 sites, median 79%, average 78%

roofcatroofing.ca scores 78%, higher than 42% of the 2315 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 34 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 98 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 62 sites90%: 35 sites91%: 44 sites92%: 37 sites93%: 23 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites78% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Several issues were identified that can improve your site's SEO. Focus first on fixing broken links and meta descriptions, as these have the most impact. Implementing these changes will enhance user experience and search visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links damage user experience and SEO rankings.

    How: Update or remove the internal links pointing to broken URLs.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Fix Title Tags

    Why: Short or long title tags can affect search visibility.

    How: Ensure all titles are between 30-60 characters and include relevant keywords.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Update Meta Descriptions

    Why: Missing meta descriptions lead to unoptimized search results.

    How: Add descriptive meta tags between 50-160 characters for all missing entries.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Improve Headings Structure

    Why: Proper heading structure aids SEO and user navigation.

    How: Ensure each page has one H1 and appropriate H2s. Adjust pages with multiple H1s or missing H1s.

    Checks: headings

  5. 5

    Address Heavy Assets

    Why: Large assets slow down page load times, impacting SEO.

    How: Optimize images over 500 KB using compression tools.

    Checks: heavy-assets

  6. 6

    Link to Orphan Pages

    Why: Orphan pages are not linked internally and may be ignored by search engines.

    How: Add internal links to the orphan pages from relevant content.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security issues that need urgent attention to protect user data and prevent potential attacks. Implementing the recommended HTTP response headers and policies will enhance the overall security posture of your site.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users typing your site address without 'https://' are vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks.

    Fix: Add the header 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains'.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of a CSP allows unwanted scripts and resources to be loaded, increasing risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add the header 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' www.googletagmanager.com www.google.com;'.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: Without X-Frame-Options, your site can be embedded in a frame, risking clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header 'X-Frame-Options: DENY'.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Without this option, browsers may incorrectly interpret files, leading to security issues.

    Fix: Add the header 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff'.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Scripts from Third-party Domains without SRILow

    Why it matters: Using scripts from other domains without Subresource Integrity increases vulnerability if those domains are compromised.

    Fix: Implement a Content-Security-Policy that specifies the trusted sources. For example, include 'script-src' directive with your domains.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Your robots.txt file reveals potentially sensitive paths that anyone can see, suggesting a lack of access control.

    Fix: Consider restricting access to sensitive paths with appropriate server-side permission controls.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/roofing-companies-offering-financing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/residential-roofers-in-regina/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/contact-regina-roofing-companies/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/need-new-shingles/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/regina-roofing-contractors/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/regina-roofing-companies/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/new-roofing-construction/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/regina-roof-repair-companies/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/new-roof-shingles/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/best-roofing-companies-in-regina/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/homeowners-guide-to-re-roofing/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 29 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/roofing-companies-offering-financing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/residential-roofers-in-regina/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/contact-regina-roofing-companies/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/need-new-shingles/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/regina-roofing-contractors/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/regina-roofing-companies/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/new-roofing-construction/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/regina-roof-repair-companies/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/new-roof-shingles/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/best-roofing-companies-in-regina/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/homeowners-guide-to-re-roofing/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/roofing-companies-offering-financing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/residential-roofers-in-regina/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/contact-regina-roofing-companies/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/need-new-shingles/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/regina-roofing-contractors/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/regina-roofing-companies/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/new-roofing-construction/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/regina-roof-repair-companies/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/new-roof-shingles/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/best-roofing-companies-in-regina/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/homeowners-guide-to-re-roofing/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/roofing-companies-offering-financing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/residential-roofers-in-regina/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/contact-regina-roofing-companies/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/need-new-shingles/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/regina-roofing-contractors/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/regina-roofing-companies/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/new-roofing-construction/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/regina-roof-repair-companies/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/new-roof-shingles/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/best-roofing-companies-in-regina/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://roofcatroofing.ca/homeowners-guide-to-re-roofing/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (29 script tags)
    • www.google.com (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 29 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    3 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of roofcatroofing.ca

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near roofcatroofing.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling roofcatroofing.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own roofcatroofing.ca?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming roofcatroofing.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.