Scanned sites / kahanelaw.com

SEO report for kahanelaw.com DR 38

The latest Site Spider scan of kahanelaw.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/kahanelaw-com/2026-09-10-1148.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-10 11:48:07 UTC, finished 2026-09-10 20:39:22 UTC

Site: https://kahanelaw.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

78/ 100Good

On September 10, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 1295 pages and 1733 assets of kahanelaw.com, starting from https://kahanelaw.com/. It scored 78 out of 100, a good result. 12 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (11), sitemap coverage (1,088), title tags (527); 6 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), sitemap coverage (−5.6), title tags (−4.5). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
1295
Assets fetched
1733
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

3,028 of 3,070 discovered URLs were fetched, 42 blocked by robots.txt, 5,700 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 307 link destinations on other sites were checked, 3503 left unchecked.

  • Title tags527 issues
    527 of 1088 pages have title issues. 73 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.5 points
  • Meta descriptions478 issues
    478 of 1088 pages have meta description issues. 73 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.3 points
  • Headings325 issues
    325 of 1088 pages have heading issues. 73 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.7 points
  • Broken links11 issues
    1146 internal links point at 11 broken URLs.
    −0.2 points
  • Links to other sites13 issues
    13 destinations answered with an error, 184 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 3503 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.4 points
  • Redirects124 issues
    125 redirecting URLs, 5 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses11 issues
    137 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 134 of them are pages, 11 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 1090 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 71 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt text6 issues
    6 of 1625 image references have no alt attribute. 36 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets11 issues
    11 assets larger than 500 KB among 1733 fetched assets. 2 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages13 issues
    13 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage1,088 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 1088 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −5.6 points
  • Internal link counts500 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 500 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 1088 pages have fewer than 200 words. 73 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format71 noted
    71 of 1295 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals73 noted
    73 of 1161 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives1,161 noted
    1161 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text31 noted
    31 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure582 noted
    582 of 1088 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 73 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length255 noted
    1 image over 100 KB; 254 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies3 noted
    3 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 1161 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 3028 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 1161 pages; 965 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 71 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2865 sites, median 80%, average 79%

kahanelaw.com scores 78%, higher than 39% of the 2865 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751490%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 42 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 79 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 108 sites78%: 131 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 124 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 121 sites84%: 131 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 94 sites87%: 94 sites88%: 81 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 58 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 149 sites78% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has several critical issues, including broken links and title tag problems. Addressing these will enhance user experience and SEO performance. A few meta descriptions and heading adjustments will also improve visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 1146 broken links negatively impact user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify and update or remove links pointing to broken URLs.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Reduce Redirects

    Why: 125 redirects, especially chained ones, slow down site performance.

    How: Streamline by eliminating unnecessary hops and ensuring direct links.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: 137 URLs with non-200 responses harm site credibility.

    How: Fix or remove URLs that do not return a 2xx response.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: 517 pages have title issues, affecting search visibility.

    How: Shorten title tags to be under 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 310 missing or problematic meta descriptions can hurt click-through rates.

    How: Create relevant meta descriptions for impacted pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Fix Heading Issues

    Why: 325 pages have heading problems that affect content hierarchy.

    How: Ensure each page has a single H1 tag and proper H2 tags.

    Checks: headings

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has multiple security weaknesses that could expose it to various attacks. It lacks critical security headers such as HSTS, Content Security Policy, and X-Frame-Options, which increases the risk of interception and clickjacking. Additionally, an outdated JavaScript library contains known vulnerabilities, which could lead to exploitation. Promptly addressing these issues is essential to enhance security.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HSTS HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of HSTS makes the site vulnerable to interception when accessed without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows scripts and styles to load from any source, raising XSS risk.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: No protection against clickjacking, allowing possible overlay with malicious content.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY or X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Vulnerable jQuery LibraryMedium

    Why it matters: Using jQuery 2.2.4 exposes the site to several known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Third-Party Scripts Without SRILow

    Why it matters: Scripts running from another domain without Subresource Integrity can be compromised.

    Fix: Implement a Content-Security-Policy that specifies allowed script sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://kahanelaw.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/family-law/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/family-law/common-law-separation-lawyers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/family-law/alternate-dispute-resolution-calgary-lawyers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/family-law/divorce-lawyers-calgary/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/family-law/child-custody-and-support-calgary/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/family-law/divorce-lawyers-calgary/spouse-support-works-alimony-calgary-alberta/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/real-estate-law/real-estate-professionals-legal-resourses-page/dower-rights-apply-e-… → no strict-transport-security
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/family-law/family-law-agreement-lawyers-calgary/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/family-law/divorce-lawyers-calgary/property-division-divorce/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/family-law/private-adoption-lawyers-calgary/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 1161 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://kahanelaw.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/family-law/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/family-law/common-law-separation-lawyers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/family-law/alternate-dispute-resolution-calgary-lawyers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/family-law/divorce-lawyers-calgary/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/family-law/child-custody-and-support-calgary/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/family-law/divorce-lawyers-calgary/spouse-support-works-alimony-calgary-alberta/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/real-estate-law/real-estate-professionals-legal-resourses-page/dower-rights-apply-e-… → no content-security-policy
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/family-law/family-law-agreement-lawyers-calgary/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/family-law/divorce-lawyers-calgary/property-division-divorce/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/family-law/private-adoption-lawyers-calgary/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://kahanelaw.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/family-law/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/family-law/common-law-separation-lawyers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/family-law/alternate-dispute-resolution-calgary-lawyers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/family-law/divorce-lawyers-calgary/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/family-law/child-custody-and-support-calgary/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/family-law/divorce-lawyers-calgary/spouse-support-works-alimony-calgary-alberta/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/real-estate-law/real-estate-professionals-legal-resourses-page/dower-rights-apply-e-… → no x-frame-options
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/family-law/family-law-agreement-lawyers-calgary/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/family-law/divorce-lawyers-calgary/property-division-divorce/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://kahanelaw.com/areas-of-law/family-law/private-adoption-lawyers-calgary/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 2.2.4. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 2.2.4 in https://kahanelaw.com/wp-content/cache/min/1/jquery-2.2.4.min.js?ver=1785870494: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (80 script tags)
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 1161 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 1161 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    80 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of kahanelaw.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near kahanelaw.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling kahanelaw.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own kahanelaw.com?