Scanned sites / redriverelectric.com

SEO report for redriverelectric.com DR 3

The latest Site Spider scan of redriverelectric.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/redriverelectric-com/2026-09-12-1116.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-12 11:16:41 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 12:21:11 UTC

Site: https://redriverelectric.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

84/ 100Good

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 18 pages and 172 assets of redriverelectric.com, starting from https://redriverelectric.com/. It scored 84 out of 100, a good result. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (16), title tags (10), headings (2); 11 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−7.5), title tags (−5.9), headings (−0.7). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
18
Assets fetched
172
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

190 of 193 discovered URLs were fetched, 3 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 7 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags10 issues
    10 of 17 pages have title issues.
    −5.9 points
  • Meta descriptions16 issues
    16 of 17 pages have meta description issues.
    −7.5 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 17 pages have heading issues.
    −0.7 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites52 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 4 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 5 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 issue
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses7 noted
    7 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 17 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 84 image references have no alt attribute. 29 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets1 issue
    1 asset larger than 500 KB among 172 fetched assets.
    −0.6 points
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.2 points
  • Sitemap coverage1 issue
    5 sitemaps listing 17 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.4 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 17 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 17 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −0.5 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 18 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 17 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives17 noted
    17 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure9 noted
    9 of 17 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length8 noted
    8 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 17 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 190 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 17 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 51 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

redriverelectric.com scores 84%, higher than 65% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites84% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Improvements are needed in titles, meta descriptions, heading tags, and resolving 404 errors. Addressing these issues will enhance SEO performance significantly.

  1. 1

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: 7 URLs return errors, affecting accessibility and user experience.

    How: Redirect or resolve the 404 errors for listed assets.

    Checks: status-codes

  2. 2

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: 10 pages have title issues, affecting click-through rate.

    How: Shorten long titles and update short ones to meet character count standards.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 12 pages have meta description issues, affecting search visibility.

    How: Revise lengthy and missing meta descriptions to improve engagement.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Add Missing Headings

    Why: 2 pages lack H1 tags, impacting readability and SEO.

    How: Insert appropriate H1 tags on the identified pages.

    Checks: headings

  5. 5

    Address Orphan Page

    Why: 1 orphan page has no internal links, limiting discoverability.

    How: Create internal links to the orphaned Careers page from relevant content.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  6. 6

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: 1 asset exceeds 500 KB, affecting page load time.

    How: Compress or resize the image to reduce its file size.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security issues that need addressing, particularly related to HTTP headers for improved security. Ensuring proper headers are set can prevent various attacks and vulnerabilities.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users may be vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks on initial requests.

    Fix: Add the header: `Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload`.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of CSP allows any script or resource to be loaded, increasing the risk of cross-site scripting attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';` to control resource loading.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options for Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Without this protection, your site can be framed and possibly exploited.

    Fix: Add the header: `X-Frame-Options: DENY` to prevent framing.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Revealing server details can help attackers exploit known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Hide server information by configuring the server to not disclose version details.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  5. 5

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from third-party domains may be compromised, changing site behavior.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) for third-party scripts or establish a CSP that specifies trusted origins.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://redriverelectric.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://redriverelectric.com/contact-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://redriverelectric.com/electrical-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://redriverelectric.com/electrician-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://redriverelectric.com/residential-electrician/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://redriverelectric.com/commercial-electrician/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://redriverelectric.com/industrial-electrician/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://redriverelectric.com/electrical-design-build/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://redriverelectric.com/agricultural-electrician/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://redriverelectric.com/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://redriverelectric.com/about-us/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://redriverelectric.com/careers/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 17 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://redriverelectric.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://redriverelectric.com/contact-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://redriverelectric.com/electrical-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://redriverelectric.com/electrician-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://redriverelectric.com/residential-electrician/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://redriverelectric.com/commercial-electrician/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://redriverelectric.com/industrial-electrician/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://redriverelectric.com/electrical-design-build/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://redriverelectric.com/agricultural-electrician/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://redriverelectric.com/about-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://redriverelectric.com/about-us/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://redriverelectric.com/careers/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://redriverelectric.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://redriverelectric.com/contact-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://redriverelectric.com/electrical-services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://redriverelectric.com/electrician-services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://redriverelectric.com/residential-electrician/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://redriverelectric.com/commercial-electrician/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://redriverelectric.com/industrial-electrician/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://redriverelectric.com/electrical-design-build/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://redriverelectric.com/agricultural-electrician/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://redriverelectric.com/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://redriverelectric.com/about-us/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://redriverelectric.com/careers/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: Flywheel/5.1.0 (190 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.google.com (17 script tags)
    • www.powr.io (2 script tags)
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 17 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 17 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    9 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of redriverelectric.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near redriverelectric.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling redriverelectric.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own redriverelectric.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming redriverelectric.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.