Scanned sites / livingskintattoo.com

SEO report for livingskintattoo.com DR 0

The latest Site Spider scan of livingskintattoo.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/livingskintattoo-com/2026-09-12-1557.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-12 15:57:04 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 16:34:46 UTC

Site: https://livingskintattoo.com/?page-found-on=2&web-search-used=brave+web+search

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

84/ 100Good

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 9 pages and 169 assets of livingskintattoo.com, starting from https://livingskintattoo.com/?page-found-on=2&web-search-used=brave+web+search. It scored 84 out of 100, a good result. 5 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by sitemap coverage (6), heavy assets (7), thin content (2); 14 checks passed. Most of the points went to sitemap coverage (−6), heavy assets (−4.2), thin content (−3.2). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
9
Assets fetched
169
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
5 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

178 of 181 discovered URLs were fetched, 3 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 24 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tagsOK
    0 of 4 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Meta descriptionsOK
    0 of 4 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 4 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites29 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 14 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 24 destinations checked.
  • Redirects3 noted
    3 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses1 issue
    4 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 4 of them are pages, 1 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −2 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 5 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 75 image references have no alt attribute. 2 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets7 issues
    7 assets larger than 500 KB among 169 fetched assets.
    −4.2 points
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.8 points
  • Sitemap coverage6 issues
    2 sitemaps listing 10 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 3 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 3 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −6 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 5 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content2 issues
    2 of 4 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −3.2 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format3 noted
    3 of 9 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 5 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives5 noted
    5 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structureOK
    0 of 4 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length7 noted
    7 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 5 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 178 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 5 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 75 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

livingskintattoo.com scores 84%, higher than 65% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites84% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Some minor issues were found that can improve your site's SEO, including fixing redirects and addressing thin content. Implementing these changes will enhance user experience and search visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirects can lead to a poor user experience and loss of SEO value.

    How: Update the sitemap to remove or update the broken URLs and ensure direct links point to live content.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 404 errors and unnecessary redirects can hurt your SEO rankings.

    How: Update or remove the broken URL and ensure correct links are active in your sitemap.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Large assets can slow down your site, impacting user experience.

    How: Compress images to reduce their size and enhance load speed.

    Checks: heavy-assets

  4. 4

    Increase Internal Linking

    Why: Orphan pages might not be indexed by search engines.

    How: Add internal links to the orphan page from relevant pages on your site.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  5. 5

    Fix Sitemap URLs

    Why: Broken URLs in your sitemap can confuse crawlers, leading to indexing issues.

    How: Correct the URLs in your sitemap to point to live pages and remove any that redirect.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  6. 6

    Improve Thin Content

    Why: Thin content can negatively impact SEO and user engagement.

    How: Expand the content on the identified pages by providing more detailed information.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website livingskintattoo.com has several security weaknesses, including missing HTTP headers that protect against various types of attacks. Immediate action should be taken to implement these headers and address exposed API keys to enhance security.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    Why it matters: No HSTS header means visitors could access the site without HTTPS, risking interception.

    Fix: Add 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload' to response headers.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of CSP allows scripts and styles from any source, increasing risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';' to response headers.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of X-Frame-Options allows the site to be framed, making it vulnerable to clickjacking.

    Fix: Add 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' to response headers.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Exposed Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: A Google API key is visible in page source, posing a risk of misuse.

    Fix: Implement restrictions on the API key in the Google Cloud console to limit it based on HTTP referrer.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  5. 5

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Without the X-Content-Type-Options header, browsers may misinterpret file types, leading to security issues.

    Fix: Add 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' to response headers.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://livingskintattoo.com/?page-found-on=2&web-search-used=brave%20web%20search → no strict-transport-security
    • https://livingskintattoo.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://livingskintattoo.com/our-artists/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://livingskintattoo.com/studio-experience/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://livingskintattoo.com/contact-us/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 5 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://livingskintattoo.com/?page-found-on=2&web-search-used=brave%20web%20search → no content-security-policy
    • https://livingskintattoo.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://livingskintattoo.com/our-artists/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://livingskintattoo.com/studio-experience/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://livingskintattoo.com/contact-us/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://livingskintattoo.com/?page-found-on=2&web-search-used=brave%20web%20search → no x-frame-options
    • https://livingskintattoo.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://livingskintattoo.com/our-artists/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://livingskintattoo.com/studio-experience/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://livingskintattoo.com/contact-us/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://livingskintattoo.com/?page-found-on=2&web-search-used=brave%20web%20search → no x-content-type-options
    • https://livingskintattoo.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://livingskintattoo.com/our-artists/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://livingskintattoo.com/studio-experience/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://livingskintattoo.com/contact-us/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…t8 (39 chars) in https://livingskintattoo.com/?page-found-on=2&web-search-used=brave%20web%20sea…: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • img1.wsimg.com (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 5 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-login.php
    • Disallow: /wp-includes/
    • Disallow: /private/
    • Disallow: /cgi-bin/
6 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 5 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    1 form found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of livingskintattoo.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near livingskintattoo.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling livingskintattoo.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own livingskintattoo.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming livingskintattoo.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.