Scanned sites / parklandvet.ca / 2026-09-12-1126

parklandvet.ca scan from 2026-09-12 11:26:56 UTC DR 2

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-12-1126

Scanned 2026-09-12 11:26:56 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 15:29:03 UTC

Site: https://parklandvet.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

86/ 100Good

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 100 pages and 1023 assets of parklandvet.ca, starting from https://parklandvet.ca/. It scored 86 out of 100, a good result. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by sitemap coverage (59), indexability (22), links to other sites (6); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to sitemap coverage (−4.2), indexability (−2.6), links to other sites (−2.4). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
100
Assets fetched
1023
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

1,123 of 1,128 discovered URLs were fetched, 5 blocked by robots.txt, 9,561 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 103 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags12 issues
    12 of 61 pages have title issues. 24 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.4 points
  • Meta descriptions13 issues
    13 of 61 pages have meta description issues. 24 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.2 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 61 pages have heading issues. 24 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites6 issues
    6 destinations answered with an error, 45 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 101 destinations checked.
    −2.4 points
  • Redirects14 issues
    15 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.7 points
  • Non-200 responses15 noted
    15 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 15 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability22 issues
    22 of 63 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 22 pages noindex by design. 22 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −2.6 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 1933 image references have no alt attribute. 222 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 1023 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pages22 issues
    22 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −1 points
  • Sitemap coverage59 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 48 URLs: 36 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −4.2 points
  • Internal link counts13 noted
    Internal link counts for 85 pages; 13 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 61 pages have fewer than 200 words. 24 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format2 noted
    2 of 100 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals24 noted
    24 of 85 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives85 noted
    85 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text3 noted
    3 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure16 noted
    16 of 61 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 24 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length16 noted
    13 images over 100 KB; 3 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies12 noted
    12 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 85 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 1123 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 85 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 55 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2332 sites, median 79%, average 78%

parklandvet.ca scores 86%, higher than 77% of the 2332 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 7 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 86 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 75 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 65 sites90%: 33 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 11 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites86% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The website has a strong health score but requires attention to redirect issues, non-200 responses, title tags, meta descriptions, orphan pages, and sitemap coverage. Implementing these fixes will improve user experience and SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects and Non-200 Responses

    Why: Redirects can confuse search engines and impact SEO rankings.

    How: Remove unnecessary redirects to ensure pages load correctly. Use 301 redirects only where absolutely needed.

    Checks: redirects, status-codes

  2. 2

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Long title tags can hurt SEO visibility and click rates.

    How: Revise title tags to be within 50-60 characters for better readability and SEO.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Correct Meta Descriptions

    Why: Overlong meta descriptions can reduce click-through rates in search results.

    How: Edit meta descriptions to be within 150-160 characters, focusing on key terms.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Address Orphan Pages

    Why: Pages without internal links are harder to discover and rank.

    How: Create internal links to orphan pages from relevant existing content.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  5. 5

    Review Sitemap Coverage

    Why: Broken or incorrectly indexed URLs in the sitemap can confuse search engines.

    How: Ensure all URLs in the sitemap are valid and not noindexed, and fix the broken URL.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security weaknesses, including missing critical headers like HTTP Strict Transport Security and Content Security Policy. These issues expose users to potential security risks, such as data interception and attacks from malicious scripts. Immediate fixes are recommended to enhance your site's security.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted if they access your site without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of a CSP allows unrestricted loading of resources, increasing the risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Without X-Frame-Options, your site can be embedded in frames, making it vulnerable to clickjacking.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Leaked Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: The Google API key should not be exposed in the front-end code to avoid misuse.

    Fix: Restrict the key's usage by specifying the HTTP referrer and API settings in the Google Cloud console.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  5. 5

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Without X-Content-Type-Options, browsers might execute files as scripts based on content.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://parklandvet.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://parklandvet.ca/our-history/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://parklandvet.ca/our-veterinarians/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://parklandvet.ca/our-care-team/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://parklandvet.ca/hospital-tour/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://parklandvet.ca/photo-gallery/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://parklandvet.ca/reviews/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://parklandvet.ca/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://parklandvet.ca/employment-opportunities/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://parklandvet.ca/care-to-share/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://parklandvet.ca/community-outreach/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://parklandvet.ca/services/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 85 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://parklandvet.ca/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://parklandvet.ca/our-history/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://parklandvet.ca/our-veterinarians/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://parklandvet.ca/our-care-team/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://parklandvet.ca/hospital-tour/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://parklandvet.ca/photo-gallery/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://parklandvet.ca/reviews/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://parklandvet.ca/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://parklandvet.ca/employment-opportunities/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://parklandvet.ca/care-to-share/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://parklandvet.ca/community-outreach/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://parklandvet.ca/services/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://parklandvet.ca/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://parklandvet.ca/our-history/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://parklandvet.ca/our-veterinarians/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://parklandvet.ca/our-care-team/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://parklandvet.ca/hospital-tour/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://parklandvet.ca/photo-gallery/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://parklandvet.ca/reviews/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://parklandvet.ca/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://parklandvet.ca/employment-opportunities/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://parklandvet.ca/care-to-share/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://parklandvet.ca/community-outreach/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://parklandvet.ca/services/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://parklandvet.ca/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://parklandvet.ca/our-history/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://parklandvet.ca/our-veterinarians/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://parklandvet.ca/our-care-team/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://parklandvet.ca/hospital-tour/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://parklandvet.ca/photo-gallery/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://parklandvet.ca/reviews/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://parklandvet.ca/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://parklandvet.ca/employment-opportunities/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://parklandvet.ca/care-to-share/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://parklandvet.ca/community-outreach/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://parklandvet.ca/services/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…Yk (39 chars) in https://parklandvet.ca/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 4 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • fd.cleantalk.org (40 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • cdn.userway.org (40 script tags)
    • cdn.trustindex.io (16 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 85 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    9 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near parklandvet.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling parklandvet.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own parklandvet.ca?