Scanned sites / hisworkmanshiplabor.com

SEO report for hisworkmanshiplabor.com DR 9

The latest Site Spider scan of hisworkmanshiplabor.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/hisworkmanshiplabor-com/2026-09-12-1836.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-12 18:36:51 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 23:05:29 UTC. Found on page 5 of brave web search results

Not a full crawl. The scan was concluded early by the site operator with 3697 URLs left unfetched. This is not a full crawl: results cover only what was crawled before it stopped.

Site: https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

86/ 100GoodNot a full crawl

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 2301 pages and 2 assets of hisworkmanshiplabor.com, starting from https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/. It scored 86 out of 100, a good result. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by headings (2,080), title tags (1,014), sitemap coverage (1,097); 10 checks passed. Most of the points went to headings (−5.7), title tags (−4.6), sitemap coverage (−3). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium5 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
2301
Assets fetched
2
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

2,303 of 6,000 discovered URLs were fetched, 13,019 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget, 3,697 skipped when the crawl was cut short. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 566 link destinations on other sites were checked, 1791 left unchecked.

  • Title tags1,014 issues
    1014 of 2138 pages have title issues. 56 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.6 points
  • Meta descriptions15 issues
    15 of 2138 pages have meta description issues. 56 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Headings2,080 issues
    2080 of 2138 pages have heading issues. 56 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.7 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites31 issues
    31 destinations answered with an error, 85 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 1791 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.6 points
  • Redirects107 issues
    108 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses108 noted
    108 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 107 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 2189 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 5 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 19732 image references have no alt attribute. 15357 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 2 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pages23 issues
    23 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage1,097 issues
    No sitemap found. Tried: https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/sitemap.xml (301), https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/sitemap_index.xml (skipped). Add one at /sitemap.xml or list it in robots.txt.
    −3 points
  • Internal link counts274 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 274 worth a look.
  • Thin content3 issues
    3 of 2138 pages have fewer than 200 words. 56 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format144 noted
    144 of 2301 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals56 noted
    56 of 2194 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives2,194 noted
    2194 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text57 noted
    57 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure53 noted
    53 of 2138 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 56 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies13 noted
    13 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 2194 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 10 response headers recorded across 2303 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 2194 pages; 2092 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 73 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

hisworkmanshiplabor.com scores 86%, higher than 73% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites86% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has a high health score but needs attention for redirects, missing title tags, missing meta descriptions, heading issues, orphan pages, and a sitemap. Prioritizing these will improve SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Resolve 108 redirecting URLs to improve site navigation and user experience.

    How: Update links to point directly to the new locations instead of redirecting.

    Checks: redirects, status-codes

  2. 2

    Add Title Tags

    Why: 982 pages have title issues affecting search visibility and click-through rates.

    How: Create unique, keyword-rich title tags for pages, ensuring they are under 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Fix Missing Meta Descriptions

    Why: 15 pages lack meta descriptions, limiting their search engine visibility.

    How: Write unique, compelling meta descriptions for the affected pages, ideally between 50-160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Add Missing H1 Tags

    Why: 2080 pages lack H1 tags, impacting content structure and SEO.

    How: Include a clear H1 tag on each page that reflects the main topic.

    Checks: headings

  5. 5

    Link to Orphan Pages

    Why: 23 orphan pages have no internal links, making them hard to find by search engines.

    How: Add internal links to relevant content that directs users to these pages.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  6. 6

    Create a Sitemap

    Why: No sitemap found limits search engines' ability to index your pages properly.

    How: Generate a sitemap and add it at /sitemap.xml; list it in your robots.txt file.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several security vulnerabilities that need to be addressed to protect users and data. Key issues include missing security headers, an outdated JavaScript library, and a publicly exposed API key. These findings require immediate attention.

  • 0 high
  • 5 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users might be vulnerable to interception during initial connection.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Lack of Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of a CSP allows potentially malicious sources to run scripts or styles.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options (Clickjacking protection)Medium

    Why it matters: Without this header, the site can be embedded in frames, exposing it to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Outdated jQuery LibraryMedium

    Why it matters: The version in use is vulnerable to multiple security issues.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to at least version 3.5.0 to mitigate known vulnerabilities.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Exposed Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: The API key is publicly visible, which can lead to unauthorized usage.

    Fix: Restrict the API key usage in the Google Cloud console by HTTP referrer to limit access.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  6. 6

    Lack of X-Content-Type-Options (MIME sniffing protection)Low

    Why it matters: This omission can lead browsers to misinterpret files, risking execution of harmful scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/cities/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/apply/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/about/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/contact-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/terms-of-use/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/privacy-policy/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/services/landscaping/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/services/landscaping/weeding/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/services/landscaping/raking/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/services/landscaping/trimming/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 2194 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/cities/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/apply/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/about/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/contact-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/terms-of-use/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/privacy-policy/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/services/landscaping/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/services/landscaping/weeding/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/services/landscaping/raking/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/services/landscaping/trimming/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/cities/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/apply/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/about/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/contact-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/terms-of-use/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/privacy-policy/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/services/landscaping/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/services/landscaping/weeding/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/services/landscaping/raking/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/services/landscaping/trimming/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/cities/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/apply/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/about/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/contact-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/terms-of-use/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/privacy-policy/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/services/landscaping/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/services/landscaping/weeding/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/services/landscaping/raking/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/services/landscaping/trimming/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 2.10.5. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 2.10.5 in https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…gM (39 chars) in https://hisworkmanshiplabor.com/apply/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 2194 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    2 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKThird-party scripts

    The sampled pages load no scripts from other domains.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of hisworkmanshiplabor.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near hisworkmanshiplabor.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling hisworkmanshiplabor.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own hisworkmanshiplabor.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming hisworkmanshiplabor.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.