Scanned sites / outlookoptometry.com / 2026-09-10-0822

outlookoptometry.com scan from 2026-09-10 08:22:44 UTC DR 3

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-10-0822

Scanned 2026-09-10 08:22:44 UTC, finished 2026-09-10 11:47:04 UTC

Site: https://outlookoptometry.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

92/ 100Excellent

On September 10, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 13 pages and 82 assets of outlookoptometry.com, starting from https://outlookoptometry.com/. It scored 92 out of 100, an excellent result. 3 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (11), heavy assets (1), headings (1); 16 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6.8), heavy assets (−0.6), headings (−0.5). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
13
Assets fetched
82
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
3 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

95 of 95 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 7 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tagsOK
    0 of 13 pages have title issues.
  • Meta descriptions11 issues
    11 of 13 pages have meta description issues.
    −6.8 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 13 pages have heading issues.
    −0.5 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites40 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 4 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 6 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 noted
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses16 noted
    16 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 0 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 13 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 31 image references have no alt attribute. 1 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets1 issue
    1 asset larger than 500 KB among 82 fetched assets.
    −0.6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverageOK
    2 sitemaps listing 13 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 13 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 13 pages have fewer than 200 words.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 13 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 13 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives13 noted
    13 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure10 noted
    10 of 13 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length6 noted
    6 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 13 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 95 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 13 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 63 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2316 sites, median 79%, average 78%

outlookoptometry.com scores 92%, higher than 92% of the 2316 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 105 sites81%: 103 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 108 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 61 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites92% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has some SEO issues that need fixing, including missing meta descriptions and 404 errors. Addressing these can improve your site’s performance. Here’s a focused plan to enhance your SEO.

  1. 1

    Fix 404 Errors

    Why: 404 errors prevent users and search engines from accessing content.

    How: Identify and remove broken URLs like the font files and sitemap.xml or replace with correct files.

    Checks: status-codes

  2. 2

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions influence click-through rates from search results.

    How: Revise the 11 problematic meta descriptions to ensure they are between 70-160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  3. 3

    Add Missing H1 Tag

    Why: An H1 tag helps search engines understand page content better.

    How: Add a relevant H1 tag to the homepage to enhance content structure.

    Checks: headings

  4. 4

    Redirect Old Sitemap URL

    Why: The wrong sitemap URL can confuse search engines when indexing your site.

    How: Ensure https://outlookoptometry.com/sitemap.xml correctly redirects to https://outlookoptometry.com/sitemap_index.xml.

    Checks: redirects

  5. 5

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Large assets can slow down page loading times, affecting user experience.

    How: Consider compressing or replacing the 8.1 MB video file with a lighter version.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lacks critical security headers and is using a vulnerable JavaScript library, exposing it to potential attacks. Implementing strong security measures is essential to protect user data and maintain site integrity.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of CSP allows arbitrary resources to load, risking XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add a Content-Security-Policy header with directives like "default-src 'self'".

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of this header can lead to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Include an X-Frame-Options header set to "DENY" or "SAMEORIGIN".

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Outdated JavaScript LibraryMedium

    Why it matters: Using jQuery 1.12.4 exposes vulnerabilities, risking XSS and other attacks.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may incorrectly interpret file types.

    Fix: Add an X-Content-Type-Options header with value "nosniff".

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 13 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://outlookoptometry.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/about/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/meet-our-doctor/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/new-patients/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/online-forms/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/payment-options/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/sitemap/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/accessibility/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/cookie-policy/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/appointments/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://outlookoptometry.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/about/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/meet-our-doctor/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/new-patients/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/online-forms/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/payment-options/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/contact/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/sitemap/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/accessibility/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/cookie-policy/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/appointments/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://outlookoptometry.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/about/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/meet-our-doctor/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/new-patients/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/online-forms/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/payment-options/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/contact/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/sitemap/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/accessibility/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/cookie-policy/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://outlookoptometry.com/appointments/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.12.4. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.12.4 in https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.12.4/jquery.min.js?ver=1.12.4: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • ajax.googleapis.com (13 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (13 script tags)
    • html5shim.googlecode.com (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 13 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 13 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    14 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near outlookoptometry.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling outlookoptometry.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own outlookoptometry.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming outlookoptometry.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.