Scanned sites / nldentalfargo.com / 2026-09-13-0432

nldentalfargo.com scan from 2026-09-13 04:32:05 UTC DR 2

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-13-0432

Scanned 2026-09-13 04:32:05 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 04:48:53 UTC. Found on page 2 of brave web search results

Site: https://nldentalfargo.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

85/ 100Good

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 32 pages and 171 assets of nldentalfargo.com, starting from https://nldentalfargo.com/. It scored 85 out of 100, a good result. 10 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (14), heavy assets (4), headings (8); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−4.1), heavy assets (−2.4), headings (−1.8). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
32
Assets fetched
171
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
10 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

203 of 203 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 19 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags2 issues
    2 of 14 pages have title issues. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.7 points
  • Meta descriptions14 issues
    14 of 14 pages have meta description issues. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.1 points
  • Headings8 issues
    8 of 14 pages have heading issues. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.8 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites2 issues
    2 destinations answered with an error, 6 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 17 destinations checked.
    −0.8 points
  • Redirects5 issues
    8 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.7 points
  • Non-200 responses8 noted
    8 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 5 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability4 issues
    4 of 14 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 13 pages noindex by design. 4 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −1.5 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 153 image references have no alt attribute. 101 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets4 issues
    4 assets larger than 500 KB among 171 fetched assets. 1 document over that size is listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −2.4 points
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.1 points
  • Sitemap coverage5 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 18 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.1 points
  • Internal link counts13 noted
    Internal link counts for 27 pages; 13 worth a look.
  • Thin content5 issues
    5 of 14 pages have fewer than 200 words. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.5 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format7 noted
    7 of 32 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals13 noted
    13 of 27 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives13 noted
    13 pages carry a robots directive; 14 carry none.
  • Anchor text10 noted
    10 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure7 noted
    7 of 14 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length29 noted
    29 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 27 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 203 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 27 pages; 9 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 49 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

nldentalfargo.com scores 85%, higher than 70% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 131 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 94 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites85% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The site has several SEO issues that need addressing, including redirecting URLs and missing meta descriptions. Prioritize fixes with the highest impact first.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirects can slow down user experience and affect SEO ranking.

    How: Update the URLs to remove unnecessary redirects. Use the final URLs directly.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Non-200 responses can lead to a poor user experience and harm rankings.

    How: Check the listed URLs and ensure they return a 200 response by correcting or removing issues.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Add Missing Title Tags

    Why: Title tags are critical for SEO and click-through rate.

    How: Create concise titles under 60 characters for the affected pages.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Implement Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions drive clicks from search results.

    How: Add unique, descriptive meta descriptions for each page, ideally under 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Correct Heading Structure

    Why: Headings enhance content structure and SEO.

    How: Ensure each page has one H1 tag and appropriate H2 tags where necessary.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Improve Thin Content

    Why: Thin content can negatively affect rankings and user engagement.

    How: Enhance content on identified pages to meet or exceed the 200-word threshold.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site lacks essential security headers, exposing it to attacks like clickjacking and code injection. Additionally, a Google API key is exposed, which could lead to unauthorized use. Implementing security headers and restricting API key usage is crucial to enhancing the site's security posture.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Without a CSP, the site is vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) and data injection attacks.

    Fix: Implement a Content-Security-Policy header: `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';`

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Missing Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of X-Frame-Options allows the site to be embedded in a frame, exposing users to clickjacking.

    Fix: Add X-Frame-Options header: `X-Frame-Options: DENY`.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Exposed Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: The API key can be used without restrictions, risking unauthorized access and charges to your Google account.

    Fix: Restrict the API key to specific referrers in the Google Cloud console.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  4. 4

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Without X-Content-Type-Options, browsers may incorrectly interpret files, leading to potential vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Add X-Content-Type-Options header: `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff`.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-Party Scripts Lack Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: The site runs scripts from external domains without validation, making it susceptible to compromise.

    Fix: Implement a CSP that lists trusted sources or use Subresource Integrity for each script tag.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The public robots.txt file exposes the /wp-admin/ path, which could facilitate targeted attacks.

    Fix: Implement proper access controls for sensitive directories instead of relying on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 27 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://nldentalfargo.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/virtual-tour/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/patient-forms/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/2020/04/17/your-childs-dental-health-the-early-years-by-a-dentist-and-a-mental-health-profess… → no content-security-policy
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/2020/03/02/star-discount-plan-for-patients-without-dental-insurance/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/2018/12/18/some-of-our-favorite-cases/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/page/2/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/page/3/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/2020/03/19/covid-19-closure/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/2018/11/01/community-matters/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/2018/10/22/featured-dental-equipment/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/2018/09/20/the-patient-experience/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://nldentalfargo.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/virtual-tour/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/patient-forms/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/2020/04/17/your-childs-dental-health-the-early-years-by-a-dentist-and-a-mental-health-profess… → no x-frame-options
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/2020/03/02/star-discount-plan-for-patients-without-dental-insurance/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/2018/12/18/some-of-our-favorite-cases/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/page/2/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/page/3/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/2020/03/19/covid-19-closure/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/2018/11/01/community-matters/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/2018/10/22/featured-dental-equipment/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/2018/09/20/the-patient-experience/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://nldentalfargo.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/virtual-tour/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/patient-forms/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/2020/04/17/your-childs-dental-health-the-early-years-by-a-dentist-and-a-mental-health-profess… → no x-content-type-options
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/2020/03/02/star-discount-plan-for-patients-without-dental-insurance/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/2018/12/18/some-of-our-favorite-cases/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/page/2/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/page/3/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/2020/03/19/covid-19-closure/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/2018/11/01/community-matters/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/2018/10/22/featured-dental-equipment/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://nldentalfargo.com/2018/09/20/the-patient-experience/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…bY (39 chars) in https://nldentalfargo.com/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.google.com (3 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (54 script tags)
    • tag.simpli.fi (27 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 27 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 27 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    3 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near nldentalfargo.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling nldentalfargo.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own nldentalfargo.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming nldentalfargo.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.