Scanned sites / studio-white.ca

SEO report for studio-white.ca DR 9

The latest Site Spider scan of studio-white.ca, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/studio--white-ca/2026-09-13-0227.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-13 02:27:26 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 04:46:54 UTC. Found on page 2 of brave web search results

Site: https://studio-white.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

85/ 100Good

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 188 pages and 2835 assets of studio-white.ca, starting from https://studio-white.ca/. It scored 85 out of 100, a good result. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (2,033), links to other sites (86), meta descriptions (51); 10 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), links to other sites (−4), meta descriptions (−2.3). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium5 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
188
Assets fetched
2835
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

3,023 of 3,023 discovered URLs were fetched, 3,644 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 273 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags4 issues
    4 of 55 pages have title issues. 126 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.2 points
  • Meta descriptions51 issues
    51 of 55 pages have meta description issues. 126 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.3 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 55 pages have heading issues. 126 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites86 issues
    86 destinations answered with an error, 86 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 273 destinations checked.
    −4 points
  • Redirects7 issues
    8 redirecting URLs, 1 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses8 noted
    8 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 7 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 137 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 44 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 6653 image references have no alt attribute. 4941 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets2,033 issues
    2033 assets larger than 500 KB among 2835 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage55 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 55 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.8 points
  • Internal link counts128 noted
    Internal link counts for 181 pages; 128 worth a look.
  • Thin content5 issues
    5 of 55 pages have fewer than 200 words. 126 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.2 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format82 noted
    82 of 188 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals126 noted
    126 of 181 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives181 noted
    181 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text44 noted
    44 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structureOK
    0 of 55 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 126 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length93 noted
    92 images over 100 KB; 1 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 181 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 3023 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 181 pages; 166 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 63 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

studio-white.ca scores 85%, higher than 70% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites85% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The site has good health but needs attention to redirects, status codes, title tags, and meta descriptions. These areas can significantly enhance user experience and SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Eliminating redirect chains improves load times and user experience.

    How: Remove the chained redirect from the URLs listed in the findings.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Fixing the non-200 responses will ensure all pages are accessible.

    How: Change the affected URLs to return a 200 status instead of redirects.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Update Title Tags

    Why: Improving title tags helps with search rankings and user engagement.

    How: Revise short (<30) and long (>60) title tags to be between 30-60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Add Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions improve click-through rates from search results.

    How: Create unique meta descriptions for pages missing them.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add Missing H1 Tag

    Why: An H1 tag improves content structure and SEO.

    How: Insert an appropriate H1 tag on the page with the missing H1.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Enhance Thin Content

    Why: Increasing word count on thin content improves content quality and SEO.

    How: Add relevant information to pages with fewer than 200 words.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security issues that need addressing, including missing crucial headers like HSTS, Content Security Policy, and X-Frame-Options. These vulnerabilities could allow man-in-the-middle attacks, clickjacking, and content injection. It’s also using an outdated jQuery library with known vulnerabilities. Address these issues to enhance your site's security.

  • 0 high
  • 5 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors could be intercepted on their first request by a malicious actor.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lacking a CSP allows scripts and styles from any origin, increasing the risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: The absence of X-Frame-Options allows clickjacking attacks by permitting your pages to be framed.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Use of Vulnerable JavaScript LibraryMedium

    Why it matters: jQuery 1.3.2 has known vulnerabilities that could be exploited.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Leaked Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: A publicly accessible API key poses a risk of unauthorized use.

    Fix: Restrict the API key by referrer and set appropriate restrictions in the Google Cloud console.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  6. 6

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may accidentally interpret files as scripts based on their content.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  7. 7

    Mixed Content IssuesLow

    Why it matters: Resources loaded over HTTP can expose users to attacks on HTTPS pages.

    Fix: Change all resources to load over HTTPS instead of HTTP.

    Evidence: Mixed content

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://studio-white.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studio-white.ca/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studio-white.ca/calgary-wedding-photographer/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studio-white.ca/photography/maternity-and-newborn/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studio-white.ca/photography/calgary-family-photographer/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studio-white.ca/photography/calgary-family-photographer/family-portraits/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studio-white.ca/photography/calgary-family-photographer/corporate/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studio-white.ca/photography/mystical-creations/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studio-white.ca/portrait-pricing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studio-white.ca/a-year-to-remember-pricing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studio-white.ca/mystical-creations-pricing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studio-white.ca/wedding-pricing/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 181 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://studio-white.ca/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studio-white.ca/about-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studio-white.ca/calgary-wedding-photographer/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studio-white.ca/photography/maternity-and-newborn/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studio-white.ca/photography/calgary-family-photographer/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studio-white.ca/photography/calgary-family-photographer/family-portraits/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studio-white.ca/photography/calgary-family-photographer/corporate/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studio-white.ca/photography/mystical-creations/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studio-white.ca/portrait-pricing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studio-white.ca/a-year-to-remember-pricing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studio-white.ca/mystical-creations-pricing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studio-white.ca/wedding-pricing/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://studio-white.ca/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studio-white.ca/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studio-white.ca/calgary-wedding-photographer/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studio-white.ca/photography/maternity-and-newborn/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studio-white.ca/photography/calgary-family-photographer/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studio-white.ca/photography/calgary-family-photographer/family-portraits/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studio-white.ca/photography/calgary-family-photographer/corporate/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studio-white.ca/photography/mystical-creations/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studio-white.ca/portrait-pricing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studio-white.ca/a-year-to-remember-pricing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studio-white.ca/mystical-creations-pricing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studio-white.ca/wedding-pricing/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://studio-white.ca/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studio-white.ca/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studio-white.ca/calgary-wedding-photographer/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studio-white.ca/photography/maternity-and-newborn/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studio-white.ca/photography/calgary-family-photographer/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studio-white.ca/photography/calgary-family-photographer/family-portraits/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studio-white.ca/photography/calgary-family-photographer/corporate/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studio-white.ca/photography/mystical-creations/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studio-white.ca/portrait-pricing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studio-white.ca/a-year-to-remember-pricing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studio-white.ca/mystical-creations-pricing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studio-white.ca/wedding-pricing/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundMixed contentLow

    724 resources on HTTPS pages are loaded over plain HTTP.

    • https://studio-white.ca/ loads image http://themes.themegoods.com/photography/demo2/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/logo@2x_white.p…
    • https://studio-white.ca/about-us/ loads image http://themes.themegoods.com/photography/demo2/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/logo@2x_white.p…
    • https://studio-white.ca/calgary-wedding-photographer/ loads image http://themes.themegoods.com/photography/demo2/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/logo@2x_white.p…
    • https://studio-white.ca/photography/maternity-and-newborn/ loads image http://themes.themegoods.com/photography/demo2/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/logo@2x_white.p…
    • https://studio-white.ca/photography/calgary-family-photographer/ loads image http://themes.themegoods.com/photography/demo2/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/logo@2x_white.p…
    • https://studio-white.ca/photography/calgary-family-photographer/famil… loads image http://themes.themegoods.com/photography/demo2/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/logo@2x_white.p…
    • https://studio-white.ca/photography/calgary-family-photographer/corpo… loads image http://themes.themegoods.com/photography/demo2/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/logo@2x_white.p…
    • https://studio-white.ca/photography/mystical-creations/ loads image http://themes.themegoods.com/photography/demo2/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/logo@2x_white.p…
    • https://studio-white.ca/portrait-pricing/ loads image http://themes.themegoods.com/photography/demo2/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/logo@2x_white.p…
    • https://studio-white.ca/a-year-to-remember-pricing/ loads image http://themes.themegoods.com/photography/demo2/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/logo@2x_white.p…
    • https://studio-white.ca/mystical-creations-pricing/ loads image http://themes.themegoods.com/photography/demo2/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/logo@2x_white.p…
    • https://studio-white.ca/wedding-pricing/ loads image http://themes.themegoods.com/photography/demo2/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/logo@2x_white.p…
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.3.2. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.3.2 in https://studio-white.ca/wp-content/themes/photography/js/jquery.cycle2.min.js: CVE-2012-6708 (selector XSS), CVE-2015-9251, CVE-2019-11358, CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023; fixed in 3.5.0
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…V0 (39 chars) in https://studio-white.ca/contact-us/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • platform-api.sharethis.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (40 script tags)
    • maps.googleapis.com (1 script tag)
5 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 181 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    2 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of studio-white.ca

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near studio-white.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling studio-white.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own studio-white.ca?