Scanned sites / myrecoverylab.ca / 2026-09-10-0848

myrecoverylab.ca scan from 2026-09-10 08:48:11 UTC DR 26

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-10-0848

Scanned 2026-09-10 08:48:11 UTC, finished 2026-09-10 14:30:06 UTC

Site: https://myrecoverylab.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

85/ 100Good

On September 10, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 138 pages and 277 assets of myrecoverylab.ca, starting from https://myrecoverylab.ca/. It scored 85 out of 100, a good result. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (9), meta descriptions (58), title tags (21); 11 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−5.4), meta descriptions (−4.3), title tags (−2). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
138
Assets fetched
277
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

415 of 415 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 245 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags21 issues
    21 of 81 pages have title issues. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2 points
  • Meta descriptions58 issues
    58 of 81 pages have meta description issues. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.3 points
  • Headings15 issues
    15 of 81 pages have heading issues. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.8 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites3 issues
    3 destinations answered with an error, 96 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 245 destinations checked.
    −1.1 points
  • Redirects30 issues
    30 redirecting URLs, 2 of them chained.
    −1.1 points
  • Non-200 responses1 issue
    197 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 31 of them are pages, 1 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 81 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 26 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 319 image references have no alt attribute. 14 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets9 issues
    9 assets larger than 500 KB among 277 fetched assets.
    −5.4 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage13 issues
    1 sitemap listing 70 URLs: 12 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.7 points
  • Internal link counts26 noted
    Internal link counts for 107 pages; 26 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 81 pages have fewer than 200 words. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format3 noted
    3 of 138 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 107 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives107 noted
    107 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure35 noted
    35 of 81 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length46 noted
    46 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies21 noted
    21 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 107 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 415 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 107 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 48 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2315 sites, median 79%, average 78%

myrecoverylab.ca scores 85%, higher than 74% of the 2315 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 34 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 98 sites84%: 108 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 62 sites90%: 35 sites91%: 44 sites92%: 37 sites93%: 23 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites85% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site shows good health but has several SEO issues needing attention. The most impactful fixes involve correcting redirects, improving title tags and meta descriptions, and addressing heading issues.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirects can degrade user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify and update the 30 redirecting URLs to their final destinations. For chained redirects, ensure that they directly point from the source to the final URL.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Fixing wrong status codes enhances crawl efficiency and user access.

    How: Audit the 197 URLs with non-200 responses and update them to return a proper 200 status or remove them.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: Well-optimized titles improve click-through rates in search results.

    How: Revise the 21 pages with title issues to ensure they are between 30-60 characters and uniquely describe their content.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions provide a summary in search results, affecting user decisions.

    How: Create unique meta descriptions for the 24 pages with issues, ensuring they are concise (around 150 characters).

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Fix Heading Issues

    Why: Correct heading structures improve content clarity and SEO.

    How: Adjust the 15 pages with heading issues to ensure that each page contains a single H1 heading and follows a logical hierarchy.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Update Sitemap Coverage

    Why: An accurate sitemap ensures search engines can find all important pages.

    How: Update the existing sitemap to include the 12 missing URLs and remove references to broken or redirecting URLs.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security concerns, including the absence of a Content Security Policy and usage of a vulnerable JavaScript library. Addressing these issues will strengthen your site's defenses against attacks.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: The site doesn't restrict where scripts and styles can load from, increasing risk of attacks like XSS.

    Fix: Add a Content-Security-Policy header to all HTML pages. e.g., `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';`

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Vulnerable JavaScript Library DetectedMedium

    Why it matters: jQuery 1.9.1 has known vulnerabilities that may be exploited depending on site usage.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to at least version 3.5.0 to mitigate these risks.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  3. 3

    Third-Party Scripts Lack Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Running third-party scripts without integrity checks increases risk if those scripts are compromised.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) for third-party scripts or use a Content Security Policy to limit sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  4. 4

    Sensitive Paths Listed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file reveals private paths, which could aid attackers in probing the site.

    Fix: Remove sensitive paths or ensure proper access controls are in place.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 107 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://myrecoverylab.ca/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://myrecoverylab.ca/service/massage-therapy/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://myrecoverylab.ca/service/physiotherapy/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://myrecoverylab.ca/service/manual-osteopathy/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://myrecoverylab.ca/service/fascial-stretch-therapy/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://myrecoverylab.ca/service/cryo-spa-cold-therapy/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://myrecoverylab.ca/service/normatec-compression/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://myrecoverylab.ca/service/infrared-sauna/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://myrecoverylab.ca/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://myrecoverylab.ca/our-team/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://myrecoverylab.ca/location/red-deer/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://myrecoverylab.ca/careers/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.9.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.9.1 in https://myrecoverylab.ca/wp-content/themes/understrap-child/js/child-theme.min.…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • data.staticfiles.io (40 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • cdnjs.cloudflare.com (120 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
9 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 107 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 107 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 107 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 107 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    24 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near myrecoverylab.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling myrecoverylab.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own myrecoverylab.ca?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming myrecoverylab.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.