Scanned sites / explorewashingtonstate.com

SEO report for explorewashingtonstate.com DR 49

The latest Site Spider scan of explorewashingtonstate.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/explorewashingtonstate-com/2026-09-10-0508.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-10 05:08:30 UTC, finished 2026-09-10 19:20:01 UTC

Site: https://explorewashingtonstate.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

85/ 100Good

On September 10, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 2844 pages and 1018 assets of explorewashingtonstate.com, starting from https://explorewashingtonstate.com/. It scored 85 out of 100, a good result. 13 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (29), sitemap coverage (1,665), title tags (617); 5 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), sitemap coverage (−3.8), title tags (−2.4). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Info1 info finding. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
2844
Assets fetched
1018
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
13 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

3,862 of 3,865 discovered URLs were fetched, 3 blocked by robots.txt, 52,647 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 5938 left unchecked.

  • Title tags617 issues
    617 of 1665 pages have title issues. 931 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.4 points
  • Meta descriptions700 issues
    700 of 1665 pages have meta description issues. 931 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.2 points
  • Headings3 issues
    3 of 1665 pages have heading issues. 931 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken links16 issues
    138 internal links point at 16 broken URLs.
    −0.1 points
  • Links to other sites2 issues
    2 destinations answered with an error, 83 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 5938 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
  • Redirects233 issues
    233 redirecting URLs, 4 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses16 issues
    285 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 248 of them are pages, 16 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability14 issues
    14 of 1684 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 912 pages noindex by design.
    −0.1 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 20243 image references have no alt attribute. 2120 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets29 issues
    29 assets larger than 500 KB among 1018 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages8 issues
    8 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage1,665 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 1665 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −3.8 points
  • Internal link counts139 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 139 worth a look.
  • Thin content18 issues
    18 of 1665 pages have fewer than 200 words. 931 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Duplicate content3 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format60 noted
    60 of 2844 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals929 noted
    929 of 2596 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives2,589 noted
    2589 pages carry a robots directive; 7 carry none.
  • Anchor text709 noted
    709 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure298 noted
    298 of 1665 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 931 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length183 noted
    148 images over 100 KB; 35 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies58 noted
    58 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 2596 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 16 response headers recorded across 3862 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 2596 pages; 2526 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 70 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

explorewashingtonstate.com scores 85%, higher than 70% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 42 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 81 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites85% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has a high health score of 90, but there are critical issues that need addressing, particularly with links and titles. Addressing these will enhance user experience and SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links damage user experience and SEO rankings.

    How: Identify and update or remove broken links to ensure all internal links direct correctly.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirects

    Why: Excessive redirects can slow down site speed and harm user experience.

    How: Update chaining redirects to make them direct to the final URLs without multiple hops.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: URLs with non-200 responses can negatively impact SEO and user access.

    How: Check the URLs returning errors and ensure they serve the correct pages.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Improper title tags can hurt SEO visibility.

    How: Shorten or refine titles exceeding 60 characters to enhance relevance.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions are essential for click-through rates in search results.

    How: Enhance short and duplicate meta descriptions to provide unique and keyword-rich summaries.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Update Sitemap

    Why: Sitemaps aren't listing all indexable pages, which can hinder discoverability.

    How: Generate a new sitemap including all crawled pages and submit it to search engines.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has a public robots.txt that lists a path which may be private. This could reveal sensitive areas of the site to potential malicious actors. Implementing proper access control is advised.

  • 0 high
  • 0 medium
  • 0 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Sensitive Path in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file publicly discloses the path '/wp-admin/', which could be targeted for unauthorized access.

    Fix: Restrict access to sensitive directories through proper authentication mechanisms instead of relying on the robots.txt file.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
12 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 2596 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 2596 HTML pages.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 2596 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 2596 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    55 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKThird-party scripts

    Scripts from 1 other domain all carry Subresource Integrity hashes.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of explorewashingtonstate.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near explorewashingtonstate.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling explorewashingtonstate.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own explorewashingtonstate.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming explorewashingtonstate.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.