Scanned sites / moz.com / 2026-10-05-2212

moz.com scan from 10/5/2026, 10:12:46 PM

Scan 2026-10-05-2212

Scanned 10/5/2026, 10:12:46 PM, finished 10/6/2026, 1:20:11 AM. Found with 42backlinks.com tool directory

Site: https://moz.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

72/ 100Needs work

On October 5, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 4893 pages and 1067 assets of moz.com, starting from https://moz.com/. It scored 72 out of 100, a result that needs work. 14 of 22 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (118), meta descriptions (2,249), sitemap coverage (2,682); 0 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−5), sitemap coverage (−4.4). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 1 check was not run because the crawl fetched nothing for it. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: not available for this scan.

Pages crawled
4893
Assets fetched
1067
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
14 of 22
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

5,960 of 6,000 discovered URLs were fetched, 40 blocked by robots.txt, 44,811 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 14,260 link destinations on other sites have not been checked.

  • Title tags1,300 issues
    1300 of 2682 pages have title issues. 935 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.6 points
  • Meta descriptions2,249 issues
    2249 of 2682 pages have meta description issues. 935 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5 points
  • Headings1,237 issues
    1237 of 2682 pages have heading issues. 935 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.1 points
  • Broken links555 issues
    21436 internal links point at 555 broken URLs.
    −3.1 points
  • Links to other sitesNot checked
    Not checked: the crawl fetched nothing this check can look at.
  • Redirects723 issues
    733 redirecting URLs, 6 of them chained.
    −0.8 points
  • Non-200 responses556 issues
    1293 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 1275 of them are pages, 556 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −1.5 points
  • Rate limited1 issue
    1 URL (1 page) answered HTTP 429 on every try, so the crawler backed off and moved on without analysing them. A site that throttles crawlers this hard can throttle search engines too.
  • Indexability246 issues
    246 of 2855 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 762 pages noindex by design.
    −0.7 points
  • Image alt text8,123 issues
    8123 of 56150 image references have no alt attribute. 2761 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.9 points
  • Heavy assets118 issues
    118 assets larger than 500 KB among 1067 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages40 issues
    40 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage2,682 issues
    2 sitemaps listing 0 URLs: 2682 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −4.4 points
  • Internal link counts322 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 322 worth a look.
  • Thin content22 issues
    22 of 2682 pages have fewer than 200 words. 935 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content2 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format598 noted
    598 of 4893 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals596 noted
    596 of 3617 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives2,862 noted
    2862 pages carry a robots directive; 755 carry none.
  • Anchor text1,998 noted
    1998 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure1,952 noted
    1952 of 2682 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 935 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length1,138 noted
    251 images over 100 KB; 887 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies17 noted
    17 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2087 sites, median 79%, average 78%

moz.com scores 72%, higher than 23% of the 2087 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0541070%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 0 sites15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 1 site28%: 0 sites29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 2 sites41%: 1 site42%: 0 sites43%: 2 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 4 sites47%: 4 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 4 sites50%: 4 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 9 sites53%: 7 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 8 sites56%: 7 sites57%: 11 sites58%: 16 sites59%: 6 sites60%: 13 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 23 sites64%: 16 sites65%: 37 sites66%: 28 sites67%: 32 sites68%: 33 sites69%: 36 sites70%: 40 sites71%: 65 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 63 sites74%: 57 sites75%: 73 sites76%: 77 sites77%: 89 sites78%: 95 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 95 sites81%: 100 sites82%: 107 sites83%: 89 sites84%: 97 sites85%: 69 sites86%: 63 sites87%: 61 sites88%: 61 sites89%: 49 sites90%: 32 sites91%: 41 sites92%: 25 sites93%: 20 sites94%: 12 sites95%: 7 sites96%: 5 sites97%: 11 sites98%: 2 sites99%: 1 site100%: 57 sites72% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Sites scoring near moz.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling moz.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own moz.com?

moz.com scan 2026-10-05-2212 | DIY SEO Hub