Scanned sites / dspotdessert.com

SEO report for dspotdessert.com DR 41

The latest Site Spider scan of dspotdessert.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/dspotdessert-com/2026-09-10-1137.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-10 11:37:45 UTC, finished 2026-09-10 19:08:14 UTC

Site: https://dspotdessert.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

74/ 100Needs work

On September 10, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 43 pages and 1234 assets of dspotdessert.com, starting from https://dspotdessert.com/. It scored 74 out of 100, a result that needs work. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (106), sitemap coverage (24), meta descriptions (11); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), sitemap coverage (−5.8), meta descriptions (−3.5). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
43
Assets fetched
1234
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

1,277 of 1,277 discovered URLs were fetched, 2,530 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 60 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags6 issues
    6 of 24 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −2.4 points
  • Meta descriptions11 issues
    11 of 24 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −3.5 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 24 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −0.5 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites2 issues
    2 destinations answered with an error, 15 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 60 destinations checked.
    −0.8 points
  • Redirects18 issues
    19 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −2.9 points
  • Non-200 responses19 noted
    19 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 18 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 25 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 253 image references have no alt attribute. 180 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets106 issues
    106 assets larger than 500 KB among 1234 fetched assets. 1 document over that size is listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages13 issues
    13 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −2.1 points
  • Sitemap coverage24 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 24 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −5.8 points
  • Internal link counts3 noted
    Internal link counts for 25 pages; 3 worth a look.
  • Thin content5 issues
    5 of 24 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −1.6 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 43 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 25 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives25 noted
    25 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure14 noted
    14 of 24 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length85 noted
    85 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies17 noted
    17 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 25 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 1277 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 25 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 46 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2316 sites, median 79%, average 78%

dspotdessert.com scores 74%, higher than 29% of the 2316 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 34 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 105 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 61 sites90%: 35 sites91%: 44 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites74% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

To enhance your site's performance, address key issues including non-200 responses and missing sitemap entries. Improving title tags, meta descriptions, and heading usage will also boost SEO. Focus on achievable fixes for maximum impact.

  1. 1

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: Resolve URLs that do not return a 200 status to improve user experience.

    How: Set up 301 redirects from the old URLs to their new counterparts: about-us, accessibility, colouring-pages, community, and contact.

    Checks: status-codes

  2. 2

    Update Sitemap Coverage

    Why: Ensure search engines can discover all pages by listing them in the sitemap.

    How: Add the crawled pages (including newly redirected URLs) to your sitemap and resubmit it to Google Search Console.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  3. 3

    Enhance Title Tags

    Why: Improper title tags can affect click-through rate and rankings.

    How: Revise title tags for 6 pages to be more descriptive and over 30 characters.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Absence of meta descriptions can lead to reduced visibility in search results.

    How: Create unique meta descriptions for 5 pages that are concise yet informative.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Address Heading Issues

    Why: Proper heading structure improves readability and SEO.

    How: Add an H1 to the 'Back to School' page and ensure only one H1 is on the 'Locations' page.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Eliminate Orphan Pages

    Why: Linking to all pages improves internal navigation and SEO strength.

    How: Add internal links to the 13 orphan pages from relevant other pages.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several critical security headers missing, which could expose it to risks like data interception and clickjacking. Additionally, a Google API key is exposed in the code, posing a potential security threat. Implementing the recommended measures will enhance the site's security posture significantly.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors can be intercepted on the initial request if they type the address without https://.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: A CSP controls where scripts and resources can load from, preventing risks like XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' cdn.popt.in; object-src 'none'

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header or a CSP frame-ancestors directive, the site can be embedded in a frame, potentially allowing clickjacking.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Exposed Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: An exposed API key can lead to unauthorized use of services, potentially leading to significant costs or data breaches.

    Fix: Restrict the API key in the Google Cloud console to specific HTTP referrers.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, a browser might execute files based on their content type rather than declared type, risking security.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  6. 6

    Third-party Scripts without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Using scripts from other domains without SRI could allow a compromised domain to run malicious code on your site.

    Fix: Consider implementing Subresource Integrity for scripts or a strong CSP that limits trusted sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://dspotdessert.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://dspotdessert.com/dspot-menu/full-concept-menu/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://dspotdessert.com/dspot-menu/mid-concept-menu/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://dspotdessert.com/dspot-menu/dessert-only-menu/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://dspotdessert.com/dspot-menu/vegan-menu/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://dspotdessert.com/locations/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://dspotdessert.com/rewards/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://dspotdessert.com/franchise/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://dspotdessert.com/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://dspotdessert.com/gallery/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://dspotdessert.com/the-scoop/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://dspotdessert.com/back-to-school/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 25 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://dspotdessert.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dspotdessert.com/dspot-menu/full-concept-menu/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dspotdessert.com/dspot-menu/mid-concept-menu/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dspotdessert.com/dspot-menu/dessert-only-menu/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dspotdessert.com/dspot-menu/vegan-menu/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dspotdessert.com/locations/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dspotdessert.com/rewards/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dspotdessert.com/franchise/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dspotdessert.com/about-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dspotdessert.com/gallery/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dspotdessert.com/the-scoop/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dspotdessert.com/back-to-school/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://dspotdessert.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://dspotdessert.com/dspot-menu/full-concept-menu/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://dspotdessert.com/dspot-menu/mid-concept-menu/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://dspotdessert.com/dspot-menu/dessert-only-menu/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://dspotdessert.com/dspot-menu/vegan-menu/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://dspotdessert.com/locations/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://dspotdessert.com/rewards/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://dspotdessert.com/franchise/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://dspotdessert.com/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://dspotdessert.com/gallery/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://dspotdessert.com/the-scoop/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://dspotdessert.com/back-to-school/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://dspotdessert.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://dspotdessert.com/dspot-menu/full-concept-menu/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://dspotdessert.com/dspot-menu/mid-concept-menu/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://dspotdessert.com/dspot-menu/dessert-only-menu/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://dspotdessert.com/dspot-menu/vegan-menu/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://dspotdessert.com/locations/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://dspotdessert.com/rewards/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://dspotdessert.com/franchise/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://dspotdessert.com/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://dspotdessert.com/gallery/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://dspotdessert.com/the-scoop/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://dspotdessert.com/back-to-school/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…sE (39 chars) in https://dspotdessert.com/store-locator/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 4 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • cdn.popt.in (25 script tags)
    • player.vimeo.com (2 script tags)
    • www.google.com (4 script tags)
    • maps.google.com (1 script tag)
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 25 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    6 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of dspotdessert.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near dspotdessert.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling dspotdessert.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own dspotdessert.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming dspotdessert.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.