Scanned sites / macct.cpa / 2026-09-13-0302

macct.cpa scan from 2026-09-13 03:02:20 UTC DR 0

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-13-0302

Scanned 2026-09-13 03:02:20 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 03:05:22 UTC. Found on page 5 of brave web search results

Site: https://macct.cpa/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

75/ 100Good

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 1 page and 36 assets of macct.cpa, starting from https://macct.cpa/. It scored 75 out of 100, a good result. 5 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (1), meta descriptions (1), sitemap coverage (1); 16 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−10), meta descriptions (−8), sitemap coverage (−6). 6 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
1
Assets fetched
36
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
5 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

37 of 37 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 2 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags1 issue
    1 of 1 page have title issues.
    −10 points
  • Meta descriptions1 issue
    1 of 1 page have meta description issues.
    −8 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 1 page have heading issues.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites1 issue
    1 destination answered with an error, of 2 destinations checked.
    −0.4 points
  • RedirectsOK
    0 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses2 noted
    2 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 0 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 1 indexable page have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 4 image references have no alt attribute. 2 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets1 issue
    1 asset larger than 500 KB among 36 fetched assets.
    −0.6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage1 issue
    No sitemap found. Tried: https://macct.cpa/sitemap.xml (404), https://macct.cpa/wp-sitemap.xml (404). Add one at /sitemap.xml or list it in robots.txt.
    −6 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 1 page; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 1 page have fewer than 200 words.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 1 page URL are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 1 page have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives1 noted
    1 page carries a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure1 noted
    1 of 1 page could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length1 noted
    1 image over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 1 page answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 7 response headers recorded across 37 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 1 page; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights1 noted
    Mobile performance 81 on average across 1 page; 1 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2507 sites, median 80%, average 78%

macct.cpa scores 75%, higher than 30% of the 2507 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0601190%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 8 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 28 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 37 sites67%: 36 sites68%: 38 sites69%: 49 sites70%: 48 sites71%: 73 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 73 sites74%: 73 sites75%: 76 sites76%: 89 sites77%: 101 sites78%: 113 sites79%: 99 sites80%: 119 sites81%: 111 sites82%: 113 sites83%: 113 sites84%: 117 sites85%: 94 sites86%: 79 sites87%: 85 sites88%: 61 sites89%: 70 sites90%: 46 sites91%: 53 sites92%: 40 sites93%: 27 sites94%: 21 sites95%: 13 sites96%: 14 sites97%: 14 sites98%: 6 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites75% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The site has several important SEO issues to address, including non-200 responses, missing sitemap, and poor title and meta description. Prioritize these fixes for better SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: Non-200 responses can hinder search engine crawling and indexing.

    How: Ensure the sitemap file is created and accessible at https://macct.cpa/sitemap.xml.

    Checks: status-codes

  2. 2

    Add Sitemap

    Why: A sitemap helps search engines discover and index your pages effectively.

    How: Generate a sitemap and upload it to your site's root directory as sitemap.xml or include it in robots.txt.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  3. 3

    Improve Title Tag

    Why: Short title tags can affect your SEO ranking and appearance in search results.

    How: Update the title tag from 'M Accounting PC' to something more descriptive, ideally over 30 characters.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Add Meta Description

    Why: Missing meta descriptions can reduce click-through rates from search results.

    How: Create a compelling meta description for the homepage, ideally between 50-160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Large assets can slow down site loading times, impacting SEO and user experience.

    How: Consider compressing the large image (523 KB) to reduce its size without losing quality.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The security review of macct.cpa identifies several critical headers missing from the website, leaving it vulnerable to attacks such as clickjacking and script loading from unauthorized origins. Immediate implementation of security headers is recommended to enhance protection.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users typing the address without HTTPS are vulnerable to interception on their first request.

    Fix: Implement the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of a CSP allows loading scripts, styles, and frames from any source, increasing risk of attacks such as XSS.

    Fix: Implement a CSP header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self'.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, your site can be embedded in frames by attackers, facilitating clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers might interpret files incorrectly, leading to potential script execution vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file exposes sensitive paths, which need genuine access controls.

    Fix: Consider restricting access to sensitive paths via authentication instead of relying on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://macct.cpa/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 1 HTML page send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://macct.cpa/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://macct.cpa/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://macct.cpa/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 1 crawled page were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKThird-party scripts

    The sampled pages load no scripts from other domains.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near macct.cpa

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling macct.cpa from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own macct.cpa?