Scanned sites / studiolumen.ca

SEO report for studiolumen.ca DR 34

The latest Site Spider scan of studiolumen.ca, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/studiolumen-ca/2026-09-12-0137.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-12 01:37:25 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 10:29:59 UTC

Site: https://studiolumen.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

75/ 100Good

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 158 pages and 1840 assets of studiolumen.ca, starting from https://studiolumen.ca/. It scored 75 out of 100, a good result. 13 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (122), heavy assets (824), title tags (77); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6.5), heavy assets (−6), title tags (−5.1). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
158
Assets fetched
1840
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
13 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

1,998 of 2,031 discovered URLs were fetched, 5,293 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 80 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags77 issues
    77 of 138 pages have title issues. 12 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.1 points
  • Meta descriptions122 issues
    122 of 138 pages have meta description issues. 12 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.5 points
  • Headings33 issues
    33 of 138 pages have heading issues. 12 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.3 points
  • Broken links3 issues
    6 internal links point at 3 broken URLs.
    −0.4 points
  • Links to other sites4 issues
    4 destinations answered with an error, 8 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 34 destinations checked.
    −1.1 points
  • Redirects4 issues
    4 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses4 issues
    8 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 8 of them are pages, 4 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.3 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 140 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 10 pages noindex by design.
    −0.1 points
  • Image alt text150 issues
    150 of 2274 image references have no alt attribute. 1773 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.4 points
  • Heavy assets824 issues
    824 assets larger than 500 KB among 1840 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage95 issues
    2 sitemaps listing 54 URLs: 90 crawled pages missing, 4 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −3.8 points
  • Internal link counts13 noted
    Internal link counts for 150 pages; 13 worth a look.
  • Thin content3 issues
    3 of 138 pages have fewer than 200 words. 12 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.2 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 158 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • Canonicals3 noted
    3 of 150 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives150 noted
    150 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text61 noted
    61 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure87 noted
    87 of 138 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 12 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length84 noted
    84 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 150 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 1998 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 150 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 42 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2499 sites, median 80%, average 78%

studiolumen.ca scores 75%, higher than 31% of the 2499 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0591180%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 8 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 28 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 37 sites67%: 36 sites68%: 37 sites69%: 49 sites70%: 48 sites71%: 73 sites72%: 72 sites73%: 74 sites74%: 73 sites75%: 76 sites76%: 88 sites77%: 99 sites78%: 112 sites79%: 98 sites80%: 118 sites81%: 111 sites82%: 112 sites83%: 113 sites84%: 117 sites85%: 93 sites86%: 79 sites87%: 85 sites88%: 61 sites89%: 70 sites90%: 45 sites91%: 53 sites92%: 40 sites93%: 27 sites94%: 21 sites95%: 13 sites96%: 14 sites97%: 14 sites98%: 6 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites75% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site requires attention to improve links, indexes, and meta elements. Focus on fixing broken links, optimizing titles and meta descriptions, and addressing heading issues for better SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Improves user experience and search engine crawling.

    How: Identify the internal links pointing to broken URLs and update them to correct pages.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Address Redirects

    Why: Reduces confusion and improves page authority.

    How: Update or remove the unnecessary redirecting URLs identified in the crawl.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Ensures all pages are accessible to users and search engines.

    How: Correct or remove the URLs that return a non-200 status.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Enhances click-through rates and SEO ranking.

    How: Revise titles to be unique, descriptive, and under 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Increases search visibility and engagement.

    How: Create unique meta descriptions for all pages, ensuring they summarize content and stay within 155 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Fix Heading Structure

    Why: Improves content organization for users and search engines.

    How: Ensure each page has a single H1 tag and properly structured headings (H2s, H3s).

    Checks: headings

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site has several security vulnerabilities that need urgent attention. Key issues include the lack of HTTP Strict Transport Security, Content Security Policy, and protections against clickjacking. Addressing these problems will enhance overall security and reduce the risk of interception and malicious content injection.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted when accessing the site via HTTP.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: No CSP allows untrusted scripts, styles, and frames, increasing XSS risk.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of this header allows clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Vulnerable JavaScript LibrariesMedium

    Why it matters: jQuery version 0.9.6 contains known vulnerabilities that may be exploited.

    Fix: Upgrade to jQuery version 3.5.0 or higher.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Lack of this protection can lead browsers to incorrectly execute files.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  6. 6

    Mixed Content DetectedLow

    Why it matters: Loading resources over HTTP on HTTPS pages can expose them to man-in-the-middle attacks.

    Fix: Ensure all resources are loaded over HTTPS to prevent mixed content.

    Evidence: Mixed content

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://studiolumen.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studiolumen.ca/best-wedding-photographers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studiolumen.ca/calgary-wedding-videographer/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studiolumen.ca/calgary-wedding-videographer/life-events/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studiolumen.ca/services/engagements/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studiolumen.ca/services/weddings/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studiolumen.ca/services/families/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studiolumen.ca/services/maternity/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studiolumen.ca/services/newborn/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studiolumen.ca/calgary-wedding-videographer/corporate/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studiolumen.ca/services/headshots/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studiolumen.ca/services/brand-story-docs/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 150 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://studiolumen.ca/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studiolumen.ca/best-wedding-photographers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studiolumen.ca/calgary-wedding-videographer/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studiolumen.ca/calgary-wedding-videographer/life-events/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studiolumen.ca/services/engagements/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studiolumen.ca/services/weddings/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studiolumen.ca/services/families/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studiolumen.ca/services/maternity/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studiolumen.ca/services/newborn/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studiolumen.ca/calgary-wedding-videographer/corporate/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studiolumen.ca/services/headshots/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studiolumen.ca/services/brand-story-docs/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://studiolumen.ca/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studiolumen.ca/best-wedding-photographers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studiolumen.ca/calgary-wedding-videographer/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studiolumen.ca/calgary-wedding-videographer/life-events/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studiolumen.ca/services/engagements/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studiolumen.ca/services/weddings/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studiolumen.ca/services/families/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studiolumen.ca/services/maternity/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studiolumen.ca/services/newborn/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studiolumen.ca/calgary-wedding-videographer/corporate/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studiolumen.ca/services/headshots/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studiolumen.ca/services/brand-story-docs/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://studiolumen.ca/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studiolumen.ca/best-wedding-photographers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studiolumen.ca/calgary-wedding-videographer/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studiolumen.ca/calgary-wedding-videographer/life-events/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studiolumen.ca/services/engagements/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studiolumen.ca/services/weddings/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studiolumen.ca/services/families/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studiolumen.ca/services/maternity/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studiolumen.ca/services/newborn/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studiolumen.ca/calgary-wedding-videographer/corporate/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studiolumen.ca/services/headshots/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studiolumen.ca/services/brand-story-docs/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundMixed contentLow

    4 resources on HTTPS pages are loaded over plain HTTP.

    • https://studiolumen.ca/fusebox-spotlight-mitchell-catmo-media/ loads image http://studiolumen.ca.user.hoster912.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/5_20240226130741_1930…
    • https://studiolumen.ca/fusebox-spotlight-mitchell-catmo-media/ loads image http://studiolumen.ca.user.hoster912.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/5_20240226130548_1930…
    • https://studiolumen.ca/fusebox-spotlight-mitchell-catmo-media/ loads image http://studiolumen.ca.user.hoster912.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/5_20240226130741_1930…
    • https://studiolumen.ca/fusebox-spotlight-mitchell-catmo-media/ loads image http://studiolumen.ca.user.hoster912.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/5_20240226130548_1930…
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 0.9.6. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 0.9.6 in https://studiolumen.ca/wp-content/themes/uncode/library/js/plugins.js?ver=20187…: CVE-2012-6708 (selector XSS), CVE-2015-9251, CVE-2019-11358, CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023; fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • player.vimeo.com (13 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
5 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 150 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    31 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of studiolumen.ca

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near studiolumen.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling studiolumen.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own studiolumen.ca?