Scanned sites / lidea-seeds.hu / 2026-10-26-1032

lidea-seeds.hu scan from 2026-10-26 10:32:16 UTC DR 19

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-10-26-1032

Scanned 2026-10-26 10:32:16 UTC, finished 2026-10-26 10:33:46 UTC

Site: https://lidea-seeds.hu/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

88/ 100Good

On October 26, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 98 pages and 33 assets of lidea-seeds.hu, starting from https://lidea-seeds.hu/. It scored 88 out of 100, a good result. 7 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by sitemap coverage (78), thin content (22), meta descriptions (15); 19 checks passed. Most of the points went to sitemap coverage (−6), thin content (−2.3), meta descriptions (−1.5). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 3 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
98
Assets fetched
33
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
7 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

131 of 131 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 7 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags3 issues
    3 of 78 pages have title issues.
    −0.4 points
  • Meta descriptions15 issues
    15 of 78 pages have meta description issues.
    −1.5 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 78 pages have heading issues.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites79 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 2 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 7 destinations checked.
  • Redirects20 issues
    20 redirecting URLs, 1 of them chained.
    −1 points
  • Non-200 responses20 noted
    20 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 20 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 78 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.3 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 326 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 33 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pages10 issues
    10 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.5 points
  • Sitemap coverage78 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 78 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −6 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 78 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content22 issues
    22 of 78 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −2.3 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format2 noted
    2 of 98 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals2 noted
    2 of 78 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directivesOK
    No page carries a robots directive; all 78 pages are open to search engines.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure15 noted
    15 of 78 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 78 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured dataOK
    No page carries structured data (78 indexable pages checked).
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 78 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 78 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions2 noted
    2 of 68 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    No page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 10 response headers recorded across 131 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 78 pages; 40 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingOK
    No unfamiliar lower-case words on 78 pages (English pages only).

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2319 sites, median 79%, average 78%

lidea-seeds.hu scores 88%, higher than 83% of the 2319 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 104 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 75 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 61 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 46 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites88% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The site has a good health score, but several issues need addressing to improve SEO. Key priorities include fixing redirects, adding meta descriptions, and updating the sitemap.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Chained and excessive redirects can affect crawl efficiency and page loading speed.

    How: Update the URLs to point directly to their final destinations without chaining.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Non-200 responses can prevent pages from being indexed by search engines.

    How: Investigate and resolve the 20 pages that do not return 2xx status codes.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Add Meta Descriptions

    Why: Missing meta descriptions can impact click-through rates from search results.

    How: Write unique meta descriptions for the 7 identified pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Fix Title Tag Issues

    Why: Short title tags may not effectively communicate page content, impacting visibility.

    How: Update the 3 title tags to ensure they are descriptive and longer than 30 characters.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Update Sitemap Coverage

    Why: Pages not included in the sitemap might not be discovered by search engines.

    How: Add the 78 pages to the sitemap to ensure complete coverage.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  6. 6

    Resolve Indexability Warnings

    Why: Pages with indexability warnings may not rank well in search results.

    How: Check the 2 pages flagged for 'No canonical' and implement appropriate canonical tags.

    Evidence: 2 pages flagged: No canonical.

    2 pages affected

    Depends on: Confirm the pages really share a cause before changing them together.

    Checks: indexability

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lacks several important security headers, increasing the risk of various attacks such as content injection and clickjacking. Implementing the recommended headers will substantially improve your site's security posture.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 3 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users may be vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks when accessing the site without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains'.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows loading resources from any origin, increasing the risk of script injection attacks.

    Fix: Implement a Content Security Policy header, e.g., 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';'.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, the site is vulnerable to clickjacking attacks where another site can embed it in a frame.

    Fix: Add 'X-Frame-Options: DENY'.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: This can allow browsers to interpret files in unintended ways, potentially leading to security issues.

    Fix: Add the header 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff'.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Missing Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Without this policy, sensitive information such as query strings may be exposed when users navigate away.

    Fix: Add 'Referrer-Policy: no-referrer'.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  6. 6

    Exposing Server Version InformationLow

    Why it matters: Revealing server details can help attackers identify known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Configure the server to hide version information. For Nginx, use 'server_tokens off;'.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  7. 7

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: Not limiting features like camera and microphone can let malicious scripts access them.

    Fix: Add 'Permissions-Policy: no-*'.

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/crops → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/csapatunk → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/lidea-1 → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/karrier → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/contact-us → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/lidea → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/kukorica → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/napraforgo → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/repce → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/cirok → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 78 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/crops → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/csapatunk → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/lidea-1 → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/karrier → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/contact-us → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/lidea → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/kukorica → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/napraforgo → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/repce → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/cirok → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/crops → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/csapatunk → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/lidea-1 → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/karrier → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/contact-us → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/lidea → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/kukorica → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/napraforgo → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/repce → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/cirok → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/crops → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/csapatunk → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/lidea-1 → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/karrier → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/contact-us → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/lidea → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/kukorica → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/napraforgo → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/repce → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/cirok → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/crops → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/csapatunk → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/lidea-1 → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/karrier → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/contact-us → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/lidea → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/kukorica → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/napraforgo → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/repce → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/cirok → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/crops → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/csapatunk → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/lidea-1 → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/karrier → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/contact-us → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/lidea → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/kukorica → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/napraforgo → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/repce → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/cirok → no permissions-policy
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: nginx/1.18.0 (Ubuntu) (131 responses)
    • x-powered-by: Next.js (78 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • lideaseedsfr.matomo.cloud (40 script tags)
6 checks passed, 2 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 78 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    1 form found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near lidea-seeds.hu

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling lidea-seeds.hu from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own lidea-seeds.hu?