Scanned sites / lidea-seeds.hu / 2026-10-26-1010

lidea-seeds.hu scan from 2026-10-26 10:10:55 UTC DR 19

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for lidea-seeds.hu.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-10-26-1010

Scanned 2026-10-26 10:10:55 UTC, finished 2026-10-26 10:12:25 UTC

Site: https://lidea-seeds.hu/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

87/ 100Good

On October 26, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 98 pages and 33 assets of lidea-seeds.hu, starting from https://lidea-seeds.hu/. It scored 87 out of 100, a good result. 7 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by sitemap coverage (78), thin content (22), meta descriptions (16); 19 checks passed. Most of the points went to sitemap coverage (−6), thin content (−2.3), meta descriptions (−1.6). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 4 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
98
Assets fetched
33
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
7 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

131 of 131 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 7 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags8 issues
    8 of 78 pages have title issues.
    −1 points
  • Meta descriptions16 issues
    16 of 78 pages have meta description issues.
    −1.6 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 78 pages have heading issues.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites79 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 2 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 7 destinations checked.
  • Redirects20 issues
    20 redirecting URLs, 1 of them chained.
    −1 points
  • Non-200 responses20 noted
    20 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 20 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 78 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.3 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 326 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 33 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pages10 issues
    10 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.5 points
  • Sitemap coverage78 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 78 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −6 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 78 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content22 issues
    22 of 78 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −2.3 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format2 noted
    2 of 98 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals2 noted
    2 of 78 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directivesOK
    No page carries a robots directive; all 78 pages are open to search engines.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure15 noted
    15 of 78 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 78 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured dataOK
    No page carries structured data (78 indexable pages checked).
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 78 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 78 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions2 noted
    2 of 68 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    No page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 10 response headers recorded across 131 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 78 pages; 40 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingOK
    No unfamiliar lower-case words on 78 pages (English pages only).

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2319 sites, median 79%, average 78%

lidea-seeds.hu scores 87%, higher than 80% of the 2319 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 104 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 75 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 61 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 46 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites87% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The website has several areas for improvement, including fixing redirects, optimizing titles and meta descriptions, and enhancing sitemap coverage. These adjustments will enhance user experience and search visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Clear up redirect chains to improve user experience and crawl efficiency.

    How: Update the redirects to direct users to the final URL without intermediate hops.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Ensure all URLs return a proper 200 response to prevent user and search engine issues.

    How: Check each URL for issues, and fix or remove any returning non-200 statuses.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Update Title Tags

    Why: Improve SEO and click-through rates with accurate and descriptive titles.

    How: Revise the 8 pages’ title tags to reflect content accurately and fit recommended lengths.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Add Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions enhance search visibility and engagement on search results.

    How: Create unique meta descriptions for the 7 pages that currently lack them.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Fix Sitemap Coverage

    Why: Ensure all indexed pages are listed in the sitemap for better discoverability.

    How: Update the sitemap to include all 78 crawled pages.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  6. 6

    Resolve Indexability Issues

    Why: Canonical tags help search engines understand the preferred version of pages.

    How: Add canonical tags for the 2 flagged pages after confirming their cause.

    Checks: indexability

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security headers missing, which can expose it to risks such as clickjacking and data exposure. Recommended actions include adding security headers to improve protection against common web vulnerabilities.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 4 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users not using HTTPS may be vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP) HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: The absence of a CSP allows malicious scripts to run potentially compromising your site.

    Fix: Add a header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: No protection against clickjacking, allowing your pages to be embedded in malicious sites.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, the browser can misinterpret file types, leading to potential attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Missing Referrer-Policy HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Lack of referrer policy may expose full URLs of user navigation to external sites.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer-when-downgrade.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  6. 6

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Revealing specific server versions can aid attackers in targeting known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Consider configuring the server to hide version details or upgrade if vulnerable.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  7. 7

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Compromised third-party scripts can change site behavior or introduce vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Implement a CSP that specifies allowed sources or consider using Subresource Integrity where possible.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  8. 8

    Missing Permissions-Policy HeaderInfo

    Why it matters: No restrictions on browser features that could be exploited by injected scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(), microphone=(), camera=().

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/crops → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/csapatunk → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/lidea-1 → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/karrier → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/contact-us → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/lidea → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/kukorica → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/napraforgo → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/repce → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/cirok → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 78 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/crops → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/csapatunk → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/lidea-1 → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/karrier → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/contact-us → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/lidea → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/kukorica → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/napraforgo → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/repce → no content-security-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/cirok → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/crops → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/csapatunk → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/lidea-1 → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/karrier → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/contact-us → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/lidea → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/kukorica → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/napraforgo → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/repce → no x-frame-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/cirok → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/crops → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/csapatunk → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/lidea-1 → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/karrier → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/contact-us → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/lidea → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/kukorica → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/napraforgo → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/repce → no x-content-type-options
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/cirok → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/crops → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/csapatunk → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/lidea-1 → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/karrier → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/contact-us → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/lidea → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/kukorica → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/napraforgo → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/repce → no referrer-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/cirok → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/crops → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/csapatunk → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/lidea-1 → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/karrier → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/contact-us → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/lidea → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/kukorica → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/napraforgo → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/repce → no permissions-policy
    • https://lidea-seeds.hu/news/cirok → no permissions-policy
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: nginx/1.18.0 (Ubuntu) (131 responses)
    • x-powered-by: Next.js (78 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • lideaseedsfr.matomo.cloud (40 script tags)
6 checks passed, 2 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 78 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    1 form found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near lidea-seeds.hu

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling lidea-seeds.hu from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own lidea-seeds.hu?