Scanned sites / lethbridgechamber.com / 2026-09-12-0256
lethbridgechamber.com scan from 2026-09-12 02:56:52 UTC DR 48
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
Scan 2026-09-12-0256
Scanned 2026-09-12 02:56:52 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 03:17:50 UTC
Site: https://lethbridgechamber.com/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 16 pages and 44 assets of lethbridgechamber.com, starting from https://lethbridgechamber.com/. It scored 84 out of 100, a good result. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (15), thin content (6), links to other sites (7); 13 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−7.5), thin content (−3), links to other sites (−2.8). 6 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium3 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 16
- Assets fetched
- 44
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 8 of 27
60 of 60 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 32 link destinations on other sites were checked.
- Title tags1 issue1 of 15 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.−0.6 points
- Meta descriptions15 issues15 of 15 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.−7.5 points
- Headings1 issue1 of 15 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.−0.4 points
- Broken linksOK0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
- Links to other sites7 issues7 destinations answered with an error, 8 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 32 destinations checked.−2.8 points
- Redirects1 issue2 redirecting URLs, 1 of them chained.−0.3 points
- Non-200 responses2 noted2 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 0 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- IndexabilityOK0 of 15 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design.
- Image alt textOK0 of 29 image references have no alt attribute.
- Heavy assetsOK0 assets larger than 500 KB among 44 fetched assets.
- Orphan pages3 issues3 pages have no internal links pointing at them.−0.8 points
- Sitemap coverage3 issues4 sitemaps listing 15 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 3 reachable only via the sitemap.−1.1 points
- Internal link counts1 notedInternal link counts for 16 pages; 1 worth a look.
- Thin content6 issues6 of 15 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.−3 points
- Duplicate contentOK0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
- URL formatOKAll 16 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
- Canonicals1 noted1 of 16 pages have a canonical worth checking.
- Robots directives16 noted16 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
- Anchor text1 noted1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
- Title and heading structureOK0 of 15 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
- Image weight and alt lengthOKNo image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
- Response anomaliesOKNo redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
- HTML and head validationNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- hreflangNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Structured dataNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Near duplicatesNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Soft 404sOKNone of 16 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
- AccessibilityNot checkedNot checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
- Link positionsNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
- PaginationNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Headers and cookiesOK0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 60 URLs.
- Orphans in searchNot checkedNot checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
- Link ScoreOKLink Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 16 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
- JavaScript renderingNot checkedNot checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
- PageSpeed Insights5 notedMobile performance 65 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
- SpellingNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
Where this scan sits among all scanned sites
2872 sites, median 80%, average 79%
lethbridgechamber.com scores 84%, higher than 65% of the 2872 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsWritten from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.
Your site's health score is good, but there are critical issues to address, including redirects, missing titles, and meta descriptions. Focus on these to improve SEO performance.
- 1
Fix Redirect Chains
Why: Chains can confuse search engines and waste link equity.
How: Update the redirects to point directly to the final URL. Ensure sitemap points directly to https://lethbridgechamber.com/sitemap_index.xml.
Checks: redirects
- 2
Update Non-200 Responses
Why: Non-200 responses can hinder access to your site.
How: Correct the URLs to return a 200 status code. Verify that https://lethbridgechamber.com/sitemap.xml returns the correct response.
Checks: status-codes
- 3
Add Missing Title Tags
Why: Title tags are crucial for SEO; only 1 out of 15 pages has a title.
How: Create unique title tags for all pages, keeping them under 60 characters.
Checks: titles
- 4
Address Missing Meta Descriptions
Why: Meta descriptions impact click-through rates significantly.
How: Define concise meta descriptions for all pages, ideally between 50-160 characters.
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 5
Add H1 Headings Where Missing
Why: H1 headings are essential for content organization and SEO.
How: Ensure each page has a unique H1 heading that reflects the main topic.
Checks: headings
- 6
Link to Orphan Pages
Why: Orphan pages are less likely to be indexed.
How: Create internal links to the 3 orphan pages from relevant content on your site.
Checks: orphan-pages
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlYour website has several security issues that need attention, including missing protections against clickjacking and XSS vulnerabilities due to outdated JavaScript libraries. Implementing these recommendations can help safeguard your site and its users.
- 0 high
- 3 medium
- 2 low
- 0 info
- 1
Missing Content Security PolicyMedium
Why it matters: Without a CSP, browsers can load content from any source, increasing the risk of attacks.
Fix: Add a Content-Security-Policy header in your HTTP responses, e.g., "Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';".
Evidence: Content Security Policy
- 2
Missing Clickjacking ProtectionMedium
Why it matters: Without X-Frame-Options, the site can be embedded in iframes, making it vulnerable to clickjacking.
Fix: Add an X-Frame-Options header to your responses, e.g., "X-Frame-Options: DENY;".
Evidence: Clickjacking protection
- 3
Vulnerable JavaScript Library DetectedMedium
Why it matters: jQuery 1.9.1 has known vulnerabilities that could be exploited depending on usage.
Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later to mitigate these vulnerabilities.
Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries
- 4
Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow
Why it matters: Without X-Content-Type-Options, browsers may execute files as scripts based on content rather than type.
Fix: Add an X-Content-Type-Options header, e.g., "X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff;".
Evidence: MIME sniffing protection
- 5
Lack of Subresource Integrity on Third-party ScriptsLow
Why it matters: Scripts from external domains without Subresource Integrity can be altered, posing risks to your site.
Fix: Consider implementing a Content-Security-Policy that includes whitelisted third-party hosts or use SRI for external scripts.
Evidence: Third-party scripts
What the checks found
- FoundContent Security PolicyMedium
None of the 16 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/ → no content-security-policy
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/who-we-are/ → no content-security-policy
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/board-of-directors/ → no content-security-policy
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/about-membership/ → no content-security-policy
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/acc-benefits/ → no content-security-policy
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/chamber-travel/ → no content-security-policy
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/chambers-plan-group-benefits/ → no content-security-policy
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/2024/12/26/example-post-3/ → no content-security-policy
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/2024/12/26/example-post-2/ → no content-security-policy
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/2024/12/26/example-post-1/ → no content-security-policy
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/staff/ → no content-security-policy
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/growthzone-template/ → no content-security-policy
- FoundClickjacking protectionMedium
No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/ → no x-frame-options
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/who-we-are/ → no x-frame-options
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/board-of-directors/ → no x-frame-options
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/about-membership/ → no x-frame-options
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/acc-benefits/ → no x-frame-options
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/chamber-travel/ → no x-frame-options
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/chambers-plan-group-benefits/ → no x-frame-options
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/2024/12/26/example-post-3/ → no x-frame-options
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/2024/12/26/example-post-2/ → no x-frame-options
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/2024/12/26/example-post-1/ → no x-frame-options
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/staff/ → no x-frame-options
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/growthzone-template/ → no x-frame-options
- FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow
No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/who-we-are/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/board-of-directors/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/about-membership/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/acc-benefits/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/chamber-travel/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/chambers-plan-group-benefits/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/2024/12/26/example-post-3/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/2024/12/26/example-post-2/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/2024/12/26/example-post-1/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/staff/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://lethbridgechamber.com/growthzone-template/ → no x-content-type-options
- FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium
1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.9.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.
- jQuery 1.9.1 in https://lethbridgechamber.com/wp-content/themes/bb-theme/js/bootstrap-4.min.js?…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- growthzonecms.com (16 script tags)
- www.googletagmanager.com (16 script tags)
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
- OKHTTPS
All 16 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKHTTP Strict Transport Security
strict-transport-security is set on all 16 HTML pages.
- OKSoftware version disclosure
No Server or X-Powered-By header is sent.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKForms over HTTPS
16 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
- OKSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.
- Not applicableReferrer policy
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
- Not applicablePermissions policy
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
- Not applicableCookie flags
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
Sites scoring near lethbridgechamber.com
Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.
- redriverelectric.comDR 384/100 · rank 872 · 18 pages
- familyplumbing.caDR 1484/100 · rank 872 · 149 pages
- sundropwellnessclinic.comDR 184/100 · rank 872 · 32 pages
- backandneckclinics.comDR 084/100 · rank 872 · 31 pages
- lethbridgephysiotherapy.comDR 284/100 · rank 872 · 26 pages
- bozemancommunityauto.comDR 284/100 · rank 872 · 8 pages
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling lethbridgechamber.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.
Own lethbridgechamber.com?
- Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
- Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming lethbridgechamber.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.