Scanned sites / latahcreekah.com

SEO report for latahcreekah.com DR 17

The latest Site Spider scan of latahcreekah.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/latahcreekah-com/2026-09-11-1442.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-11 14:42:15 UTC, finished 2026-09-11 15:01:27 UTC

Site: https://latahcreekah.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

75/ 100Good

On September 11, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 134 pages and 405 assets of latahcreekah.com, starting from https://latahcreekah.com/. It scored 75 out of 100, a good result. 10 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (17), meta descriptions (70), title tags (49); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−4.7), title tags (−4.1). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
134
Assets fetched
405
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
10 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

539 of 541 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 48 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags49 issues
    49 of 117 pages have title issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.1 points
  • Meta descriptions70 issues
    70 of 117 pages have meta description issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.7 points
  • Headings43 issues
    43 of 117 pages have heading issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.2 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites3 issues
    3 destinations answered with an error, 11 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 48 destinations checked.
    −1 points
  • Redirects14 issues
    15 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.5 points
  • Non-200 responses27 noted
    27 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 14 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 120 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.2 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 236 image references have no alt attribute. 236 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets17 issues
    17 assets larger than 500 KB among 405 fetched assets. 9 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages50 issues
    50 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −1.7 points
  • Sitemap coverage54 issues
    3 sitemaps listing 113 URLs: 4 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 50 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2.7 points
  • Internal link counts17 noted
    Internal link counts for 120 pages; 17 worth a look.
  • Thin content22 issues
    22 of 117 pages have fewer than 200 words. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.5 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format4 noted
    4 of 134 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals3 noted
    3 of 120 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives120 noted
    120 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text32 noted
    32 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure72 noted
    72 of 117 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length1 noted
    1 image over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 120 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 539 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 120 pages; 76 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 25 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2488 sites, median 80%, average 78%

latahcreekah.com scores 75%, higher than 31% of the 2488 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0591180%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 8 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 28 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 36 sites68%: 36 sites69%: 49 sites70%: 48 sites71%: 73 sites72%: 72 sites73%: 73 sites74%: 72 sites75%: 75 sites76%: 88 sites77%: 99 sites78%: 112 sites79%: 97 sites80%: 118 sites81%: 111 sites82%: 112 sites83%: 112 sites84%: 115 sites85%: 94 sites86%: 77 sites87%: 84 sites88%: 60 sites89%: 70 sites90%: 45 sites91%: 52 sites92%: 40 sites93%: 27 sites94%: 21 sites95%: 13 sites96%: 14 sites97%: 14 sites98%: 6 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites75% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has a good health score, but there are several areas to improve. Focus on title tags, meta descriptions, heading issues, and redirects as priorities to enhance visibility and performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Title Tag Issues

    Why: 49 pages have long title tags, impacting SEO.

    How: Shorten title tags to under 60 characters. Use concise terms relevant to content.

    Checks: titles

  2. 2

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 54 pages with issues; many are duplicates or too long.

    How: Revise meta descriptions to be unique and around 150 characters, describing page content accurately.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  3. 3

    Resolve Redirects and Non-200 Responses

    Why: 27 URLs returning non-200 responses, which can harm user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify and fix or remove non-functional URLs, replacing them with correct links.

    Checks: redirects, status-codes

  4. 4

    Consolidate Headings

    Why: 43 pages have multiple H1s, confusing search engines and users.

    How: Revise headings to have a single H1 per page, using secondary headings (H2, H3) as needed.

    Checks: headings

  5. 5

    Link Orphan Pages

    Why: 50 orphan pages limit visibility and user access.

    How: Add internal links to orphan pages from relevant high-traffic pages.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  6. 6

    Enhance Sitemap Coverage

    Why: 4 crawled pages are missing from the sitemap, affecting indexing.

    How: Update the sitemap to include all pages and ensure no important pages are excluded.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website lacks a Content Security Policy, which can expose it to security risks like cross-site scripting attacks. There are also third-party scripts running without safeguards, and your robots.txt file discloses potentially sensitive paths. Here are the findings to prioritize for improved security.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Without a Content Security Policy, your site is vulnerable to various attacks including XSS.

    Fix: Implement a Content Security Policy header by adding 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';'.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Third-party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Using third-party scripts without integrity checks poses a security risk if they are compromised.

    Fix: Consider deploying a Content Security Policy that restricts the sources of these scripts. Alternatively, use Subresource Integrity where possible.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  3. 3

    Sensitive Path in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file exposes the /wp-admin/ path, potentially aiding malicious users.

    Fix: Restrict access to sensitive paths using appropriate server-side access controls, not solely relying on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 120 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://latahcreekah.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://latahcreekah.com/spokane-veterinarians/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://latahcreekah.com/fear-free-vet-spokane/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://latahcreekah.com/cat-friendly/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://latahcreekah.com/aaha-accredited/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://latahcreekah.com/spokane-wa-veterinary-careers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://latahcreekah.com/benefits-perks/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://latahcreekah.com/cat-doc-megan/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://latahcreekah.com/veterinary-services-in-spokane-wa/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://latahcreekah.com/how-we-differ/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://latahcreekah.com/spokane-wa-veterinary-payment-options/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://latahcreekah.com/after-hours/ → no content-security-policy
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • book.getweave.com (40 script tags)
    • www.instagram.com (2 script tags)
    • www.google.com (12 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
10 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 120 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 120 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 120 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 120 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    13 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of latahcreekah.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near latahcreekah.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling latahcreekah.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own latahcreekah.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming latahcreekah.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.