Scanned sites / e-accounting.biz

SEO report for e-accounting.biz DR 1

The latest Site Spider scan of e-accounting.biz, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/e--accounting-biz/2026-09-10-0512.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-10 05:12:55 UTC, finished 2026-09-10 07:30:26 UTC

Site: https://e-accounting.biz/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

75/ 100Good

On September 10, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 63 pages and 448 assets of e-accounting.biz, starting from https://e-accounting.biz/. It scored 75 out of 100, a good result. 13 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (15), meta descriptions (33), title tags (16); 6 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−5.4), title tags (−3.3). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
63
Assets fetched
448
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
13 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

511 of 511 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 21 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags16 issues
    16 of 38 pages have title issues. 11 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.3 points
  • Meta descriptions33 issues
    33 of 38 pages have meta description issues. 11 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.4 points
  • Headings13 issues
    13 of 38 pages have heading issues. 11 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.6 points
  • Broken links7 issues
    57 internal links point at 7 broken URLs.
    −2.9 points
  • Links to other sites2 issues
    2 destinations answered with an error, 9 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 21 destinations checked.
    −0.8 points
  • Redirects7 issues
    7 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.6 points
  • Non-200 responses7 issues
    30 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 14 of them are pages, 7 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −1.4 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability3 issues
    3 of 38 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 11 pages noindex by design. 3 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −0.6 points
  • Image alt text2 issues
    2 of 292 image references have no alt attribute. 183 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets15 issues
    15 assets larger than 500 KB among 448 fetched assets. 1 document over that size is listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages7 issues
    7 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.6 points
  • Sitemap coverage7 issues
    3 sitemaps listing 41 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 4 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.9 points
  • Internal link counts8 noted
    Internal link counts for 49 pages; 8 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 38 pages have fewer than 200 words. 11 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content6 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −1 points
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 63 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 49 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives49 noted
    49 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text16 noted
    16 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure9 noted
    9 of 38 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 11 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length25 noted
    24 images over 100 KB; 1 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies6 noted
    6 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 49 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 511 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 49 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 43 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2479 sites, median 80%, average 78%

e-accounting.biz scores 75%, higher than 31% of the 2479 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0591170%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 6 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 7 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 28 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 36 sites68%: 36 sites69%: 49 sites70%: 47 sites71%: 73 sites72%: 72 sites73%: 73 sites74%: 72 sites75%: 75 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 98 sites78%: 112 sites79%: 97 sites80%: 117 sites81%: 110 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 112 sites84%: 114 sites85%: 94 sites86%: 76 sites87%: 82 sites88%: 60 sites89%: 70 sites90%: 44 sites91%: 52 sites92%: 39 sites93%: 27 sites94%: 21 sites95%: 13 sites96%: 14 sites97%: 14 sites98%: 6 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites75% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Addressing broken links, non-200 responses, and title/description issues will significantly enhance user experience and SEO. Fix high-impact problems first for optimal results.

  1. 1

    Repair Broken Links

    Why: 57 internal links pointing to 7 dead URLs can harm user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify the pages with broken links and update or remove them.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: 30 URLs returning errors negatively impact site accessibility.

    How: Review URLs with non-200 responses and correct or remove them.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Revise Title Tags

    Why: 15 pages have title issues affecting visibility in search results.

    How: Shorten titles longer than 60 characters and ensure all pages have unique titles.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 26 pages have description issues, missing vital information for users and search engines.

    How: Add or revise meta descriptions, ensuring each is within 150-160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Fix Heading Issues

    Why: 13 pages have heading issues, which may confuse search engines and users.

    How: Ensure each page has a single H1 and proper hierarchy of headings.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Create Internal Links for Orphan Pages

    Why: 7 orphan pages lack visibility and are not linked internally.

    How: Add links to these pages from other relevant content to enhance accessibility.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website e-accounting.biz lacks essential security headers, which may expose it to risks like clickjacking and script attacks. Additionally, it uses an outdated jQuery library with known vulnerabilities. Implementing recommended security headers and updating libraries will improve the site's security posture.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users who access the site without HTTPS may be vulnerable to interception.

    Fix: Add the Strict-Transport-Security header with a value of 'max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains'.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: The absence of CSP allows scripts to execute from any source, increasing the risk of attacks.

    Fix: Add a Content-Security-Policy header with an appropriate policy (e.g., 'default-src 'self'; script-src 'self''); ensure it fits your site requirements.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of clickjacking protection can enable malicious framing of your pages.

    Fix: Add the X-Frame-Options header with a value of 'DENY' or 'SAMEORIGIN'.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Using Vulnerable jQuery LibraryMedium

    Why it matters: The outdated jQuery 3.1.1 has known vulnerabilities that could be exploited depending on usage.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later to address known vulnerabilities.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, the browser may incorrectly execute content as a script based on its MIME type.

    Fix: Add the X-Content-Type-Options header with a value of 'nosniff'.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://e-accounting.biz/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://e-accounting.biz/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://e-accounting.biz/blog-case-studies/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://e-accounting.biz/services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://e-accounting.biz/outsourced-accounting-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://e-accounting.biz/outsourced-bookkeeping-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://e-accounting.biz/controller-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://e-accounting.biz/outsourced-cfo-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://e-accounting.biz/accounting-for-msps-it-companies/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://e-accounting.biz/outsourced-accounting-for-senior-living-centers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://e-accounting.biz/outsourced-accounting-for-trucking-industry/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://e-accounting.biz/careers/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 49 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://e-accounting.biz/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://e-accounting.biz/about-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://e-accounting.biz/blog-case-studies/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://e-accounting.biz/services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://e-accounting.biz/outsourced-accounting-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://e-accounting.biz/outsourced-bookkeeping-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://e-accounting.biz/controller-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://e-accounting.biz/outsourced-cfo-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://e-accounting.biz/accounting-for-msps-it-companies/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://e-accounting.biz/outsourced-accounting-for-senior-living-centers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://e-accounting.biz/outsourced-accounting-for-trucking-industry/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://e-accounting.biz/careers/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://e-accounting.biz/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://e-accounting.biz/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://e-accounting.biz/blog-case-studies/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://e-accounting.biz/services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://e-accounting.biz/outsourced-accounting-services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://e-accounting.biz/outsourced-bookkeeping-services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://e-accounting.biz/controller-services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://e-accounting.biz/outsourced-cfo-services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://e-accounting.biz/accounting-for-msps-it-companies/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://e-accounting.biz/outsourced-accounting-for-senior-living-centers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://e-accounting.biz/outsourced-accounting-for-trucking-industry/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://e-accounting.biz/careers/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://e-accounting.biz/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://e-accounting.biz/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://e-accounting.biz/blog-case-studies/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://e-accounting.biz/services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://e-accounting.biz/outsourced-accounting-services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://e-accounting.biz/outsourced-bookkeeping-services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://e-accounting.biz/controller-services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://e-accounting.biz/outsourced-cfo-services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://e-accounting.biz/accounting-for-msps-it-companies/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://e-accounting.biz/outsourced-accounting-for-senior-living-centers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://e-accounting.biz/outsourced-accounting-for-trucking-industry/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://e-accounting.biz/careers/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 3.1.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 3.1.1 in https://e-accounting.biz/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jquery…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (80 script tags)
    • www.google.com (44 script tags)
    • e-accounting.activehosted.com (13 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 49 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    6 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of e-accounting.biz

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near e-accounting.biz

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling e-accounting.biz from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own e-accounting.biz?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming e-accounting.biz. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.