Scanned sites / jhmckenzie.com

SEO report for jhmckenzie.com DR 1

The latest Site Spider scan of jhmckenzie.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/jhmckenzie-com/2026-09-13-0547.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-13 05:47:20 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 06:53:23 UTC. Found on page 4 of brave web search results

Site: https://jhmckenzie.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

89/ 100Good

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 11 pages and 328 assets of jhmckenzie.com, starting from https://jhmckenzie.com/. It scored 89 out of 100, a good result. 7 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (6), meta descriptions (4), title tags (2); 11 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−3.6), meta descriptions (−2.9), title tags (−1.8). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Low1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
11
Assets fetched
328
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
7 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

339 of 339 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 3 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags2 issues
    2 of 9 pages have title issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.8 points
  • Meta descriptions4 issues
    4 of 9 pages have meta description issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.9 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 9 pages have heading issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.5 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sitesOK
    0 destinations answered with an error, of 1 destination checked.
  • Redirects1 noted
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses1 noted
    1 URL did not return a 2xx response. 0 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 9 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 2 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 99 image references have no alt attribute. 39 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets6 issues
    6 assets larger than 500 KB among 328 fetched assets.
    −3.6 points
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.4 points
  • Sitemap coverage1 issue
    2 sitemaps listing 9 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.5 points
  • Internal link counts2 noted
    Internal link counts for 11 pages; 2 worth a look.
  • Thin content2 issues
    2 of 9 pages have fewer than 200 words. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.5 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 11 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • Canonicals2 noted
    2 of 11 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives11 noted
    11 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure1 noted
    1 of 9 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length16 noted
    16 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 11 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 339 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 11 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 42 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2505 sites, median 80%, average 78%

jhmckenzie.com scores 89%, higher than 85% of the 2505 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0601190%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 8 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 28 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 37 sites67%: 36 sites68%: 37 sites69%: 49 sites70%: 48 sites71%: 73 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 74 sites74%: 73 sites75%: 77 sites76%: 88 sites77%: 100 sites78%: 113 sites79%: 98 sites80%: 119 sites81%: 111 sites82%: 113 sites83%: 113 sites84%: 117 sites85%: 94 sites86%: 79 sites87%: 85 sites88%: 61 sites89%: 70 sites90%: 46 sites91%: 53 sites92%: 40 sites93%: 27 sites94%: 21 sites95%: 13 sites96%: 14 sites97%: 14 sites98%: 6 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites89% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has an excellent score but requires some improvements. Focus on fixing redirects, non-200 responses, title tags, meta descriptions, headings, and optimizing heavy assets for better performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirects can harm user experience and SEO.

    How: Update the sitemap link to point directly to the correct URL for efficient access.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Response

    Why: URLs returning non-200 responses can hinder accessibility.

    How: Ensure the URL returns a valid 2xx status code; evaluate if the URL needs to be active.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Shorten Title Tags

    Why: Long title tags can be truncated in search results.

    How: Edit titles for https://jhmckenzie.com/electrical-maintenance-service/ and https://jhmckenzie.com/staff-notices-and-safety/ to be under 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Fix Meta Description Issues

    Why: Meta descriptions over 160 characters or too short can affect click-through rates.

    How: Revise meta descriptions for https://jhmckenzie.com/electrical-maintenance-service/ and https://jhmckenzie.com/staff-notices-and-safety/ to meet character limits.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add Missing Headings

    Why: Missing headings can impact SEO and user navigation.

    How: Add an H1 tag to https://jhmckenzie.com/staff-notices-and-safety/ for improved structure.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Large assets can slow down page loading times.

    How: Compress images or use WebP format for the heavy assets listed.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website jhmckenzie.com has notable security practices, particularly with HTTPS and strict security headers in place. However, there are critical concerns regarding third-party scripts that could lead to vulnerabilities and sensitive paths exposed in the robots.txt file that should be addressed.

  • 0 high
  • 0 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Third-party scripts lack Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains without SRI may introduce risks if those sources are compromised.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) for external scripts or use a Content-Security-Policy to specify trusted sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  2. 2

    Sensitive paths listed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The visibility of the Disallow directive exposes private paths, which may lead to targeted probing.

    Fix: Remove or restrict access to /wp-admin/ through proper access control measures instead of relying only on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (11 script tags)
    • www.google.com (11 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
11 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 11 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 11 HTML pages.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 11 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 11 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    4 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of jhmckenzie.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near jhmckenzie.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling jhmckenzie.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own jhmckenzie.com?