Scanned sites / fargomom.com

SEO report for fargomom.com DR 27

The latest Site Spider scan of fargomom.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/fargomom-com/2026-09-12-1327.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-12 13:27:09 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 23:03:39 UTC

Not a full crawl. The scan was concluded early by the site operator with 2148 URLs left unfetched. This is not a full crawl: results cover only what was crawled before it stopped.

Site: https://fargomom.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

89/ 100GoodNot a full crawl

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 3103 pages and 221 assets of fargomom.com, starting from https://fargomom.com/. It scored 89 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (911), sitemap coverage (1,470), meta descriptions (927); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−3.1), sitemap coverage (−3), meta descriptions (−2.5). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
3103
Assets fetched
221
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

3,324 of 6,206 discovered URLs were fetched, 733 blocked by robots.txt, 126,392 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget, 2,148 skipped when the crawl was cut short. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 1,303 link destinations on other sites were checked, 12572 left unchecked.

  • Title tags911 issues
    911 of 1764 pages have title issues. 1176 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.1 points
  • Meta descriptions927 issues
    927 of 1764 pages have meta description issues. 1176 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.5 points
  • Headings10 issues
    10 of 1764 pages have heading issues. 1176 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken links12 issues
    100 internal links point at 12 broken URLs.
    −0.1 points
  • Links to other sites3 issues
    3 destinations answered with an error, 129 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 12572 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
  • Redirects155 issues
    152 redirecting URLs, 6 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses12 issues
    164 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 163 of them are pages, 12 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability7 issues
    7 of 2184 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 756 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt text16,102 issues
    16102 of 53313 image references have no alt attribute. 7050 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −1.8 points
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 221 fetched assets. 7 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
  • Orphan pages3 issues
    3 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage1,470 issues
    No sitemap found. Tried: https://fargomom.com/sitemap.xml (301), https://fargomom.com/sitemap_index.xml (skipped). Add one at /sitemap.xml or list it in robots.txt.
    −3 points
  • Internal link counts500 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 500 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 1764 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1176 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format579 noted
    579 of 3103 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals1,177 noted
    1177 of 2940 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives2,940 noted
    2940 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text2,145 noted
    2145 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure1,550 noted
    1550 of 1764 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1176 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length1 noted
    0 images over 100 KB; 1 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies18 noted
    18 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 2940 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 3324 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 2940 pages; 2713 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 35 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2505 sites, median 80%, average 78%

fargomom.com scores 89%, higher than 85% of the 2505 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0601190%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 8 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 28 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 37 sites67%: 36 sites68%: 37 sites69%: 49 sites70%: 48 sites71%: 73 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 74 sites74%: 73 sites75%: 77 sites76%: 88 sites77%: 100 sites78%: 113 sites79%: 98 sites80%: 119 sites81%: 111 sites82%: 113 sites83%: 113 sites84%: 117 sites85%: 94 sites86%: 79 sites87%: 85 sites88%: 61 sites89%: 70 sites90%: 46 sites91%: 53 sites92%: 40 sites93%: 27 sites94%: 21 sites95%: 13 sites96%: 14 sites97%: 14 sites98%: 6 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites89% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has a solid health score, but there are notable areas to improve including broken links and redirects that can impact user experience and SEO. Here's a concise plan for high-impact fixes.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Improves user experience and SEO by ensuring all internal links work.

    How: Identify and update or remove 100 broken links throughout the site.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirects

    Why: Reduces load time and improves user experience by minimizing unnecessary redirects.

    How: Update 152 redirecting URLs and eliminate chained redirects.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: Fixes accessibility issues and enhances site performance by ensuring all pages return 2xx responses.

    How: Investigate and correct the 164 URLs not returning a 2xx response.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: Enhances SEO by ensuring all pages have optimized title tags for better visibility.

    How: Rewrite or add title tags for 909 pages with issues to meet length and relevance criteria.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Boosts click-through rates from search results by providing descriptive summaries for each page.

    How: Create unique meta descriptions for 897 pages with issues.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Create a Sitemap

    Why: Helps search engines index your site effectively, improving visibility.

    How: Generate and implement a sitemap at /sitemap.xml or list one in robots.txt.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several critical security vulnerabilities. Most notably, it lacks essential security headers like Content Security Policy and X-Frame-Options, which protect against various attacks. Additionally, you are using an outdated version of jQuery with known vulnerabilities. Immediate action is needed to enhance your site's security.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Without a Content Security Policy, you're vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) and data injection attacks.

    Fix: Add the header `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';` to restrict script sources.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: The absence of this header allows clickjacking attacks where your pages can be embedded on malicious sites.

    Fix: Include the header `X-Frame-Options: DENY` to prevent framing of your content.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Outdated jQuery LibraryMedium

    Why it matters: Using jQuery 3.1.1 leaves you exposed to security vulnerabilities that could be exploited.

    Fix: Upgrade to at least jQuery 3.5.0 to mitigate these risks.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Not specifying this header may lead browsers to interpret files inaccurately, increasing XSS risk.

    Fix: Add the header `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff` to enhance security.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 2940 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://fargomom.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://fargomom.com/category/in-around-fargo/guide-to-fargo/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://fargomom.com/youth-sports-activities-fargo-moorhead/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://fargomom.com/fargo-pediatricians-childrens-therapy/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://fargomom.com/special-needs-fargo/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://fargomom.com/preschools-schools-in-fargo-moorhead/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://fargomom.com/swimming-lessons-fargo-open-swim/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://fargomom.com/photographers-in-fargo/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://fargomom.com/birthday-parties-fargo/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://fargomom.com/gyms-in-fargo-moorhead/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://fargomom.com/womens-health-fargo/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://fargomom.com/spas-in-fargo-moorhead/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://fargomom.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://fargomom.com/category/in-around-fargo/guide-to-fargo/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://fargomom.com/youth-sports-activities-fargo-moorhead/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://fargomom.com/fargo-pediatricians-childrens-therapy/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://fargomom.com/special-needs-fargo/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://fargomom.com/preschools-schools-in-fargo-moorhead/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://fargomom.com/swimming-lessons-fargo-open-swim/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://fargomom.com/photographers-in-fargo/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://fargomom.com/birthday-parties-fargo/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://fargomom.com/gyms-in-fargo-moorhead/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://fargomom.com/womens-health-fargo/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://fargomom.com/spas-in-fargo-moorhead/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://fargomom.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://fargomom.com/category/in-around-fargo/guide-to-fargo/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://fargomom.com/youth-sports-activities-fargo-moorhead/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://fargomom.com/fargo-pediatricians-childrens-therapy/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://fargomom.com/special-needs-fargo/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://fargomom.com/preschools-schools-in-fargo-moorhead/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://fargomom.com/swimming-lessons-fargo-open-swim/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://fargomom.com/photographers-in-fargo/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://fargomom.com/birthday-parties-fargo/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://fargomom.com/gyms-in-fargo-moorhead/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://fargomom.com/womens-health-fargo/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://fargomom.com/spas-in-fargo-moorhead/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 3.1.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 3.1.1 in https://fargomom.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jquery.min…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • ads.blogherads.com (160 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 2 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-login.php
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 2940 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 2940 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    162 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of fargomom.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near fargomom.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling fargomom.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own fargomom.com?