Scanned sites / itres.fusenv.com

SEO report for itres.fusenv.com DR 42

The latest Site Spider scan of itres.fusenv.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/itres-fusenv-com/2026-09-11-1704.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-11 17:04:00 UTC, finished 2026-09-11 18:05:16 UTC

Site: https://itres.fusenv.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

74/ 100Needs work

On September 11, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 162 pages and 1019 assets of itres.fusenv.com, starting from https://itres.fusenv.com/. It scored 74 out of 100, a result that needs work. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (141), heavy assets (31), sitemap coverage (141); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−7.1), heavy assets (−6), sitemap coverage (−5.4). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium5 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
162
Assets fetched
1019
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

1,181 of 1,181 discovered URLs were fetched, 1,157 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 29 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags49 issues
    49 of 141 pages have title issues. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.1 points
  • Meta descriptions141 issues
    141 of 141 pages have meta description issues. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −7.1 points
  • Headings112 issues
    112 of 141 pages have heading issues. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.3 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites1 issue
    1 destination answered with an error, 2 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 29 destinations checked.
    −0.3 points
  • Redirects3 issues
    3 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses1 issue
    4 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 4 of them are pages, 1 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 142 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 16 pages noindex by design.
    −0.1 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 1939 image references have no alt attribute. 426 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets31 issues
    31 assets larger than 500 KB among 1019 fetched assets. 17 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage141 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 141 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −5.4 points
  • Internal link counts16 noted
    Internal link counts for 158 pages; 16 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 141 pages have fewer than 200 words. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format90 noted
    90 of 162 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals17 noted
    17 of 158 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives158 noted
    158 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text116 noted
    116 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure1 noted
    1 of 141 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length92 noted
    92 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies2 noted
    2 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 158 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 9 response headers recorded across 1181 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 158 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 58 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2333 sites, median 79%, average 78%

itres.fusenv.com scores 74%, higher than 29% of the 2333 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 7 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 108 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 86 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 65 sites90%: 33 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 11 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites74% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website has several key issues affecting SEO performance, including title, meta description, and heading problems. Prioritize fixing these to improve visibility and user experience.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Three URLs are redirecting unnecessarily, complicating access.

    How: Update links or remove redirects for affected URLs: /2011/08/tabi-1800-on-discovery-channel/, /contact, and /service-desk.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Four URLs are returning errors, which can harm user experience.

    How: Check URLs that return errors: /service-desk and the redirects above. Ensure they return a 200 response or fix links.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Update Title Tags

    Why: 45 pages have title issues, affecting SEO rankings.

    How: Revise titles to be under 60 characters or relevant, ensuring each page has a unique title.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 141 pages have meta description issues, hurting click-through rates.

    How: Write unique meta descriptions for each page, ideally between 150-160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Fix Heading Structure

    Why: Many pages lack proper heading structure, important for SEO.

    How: Ensure each page has a single H1 tag and appropriate H2/H3 tags for sections. Review all affected pages.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Add Pages to Sitemap

    Why: Several important pages are missing from the sitemap, hindering indexing.

    How: Update the sitemap to include all crawled pages, especially those listed as missing.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site has several security issues that could compromise user privacy and integrity, including missing key HTTP headers for protection against various attacks, using a vulnerable JavaScript library, and exposing a Google API key. Immediate remediation is recommended to enhance security.

  • 0 high
  • 5 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: No HTML page sends the HSTS header, making initial connections vulnerable to interception.

    Fix: Add the header 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains' to your server configuration.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Without a CSP, there are no restrictions on the sources of scripts, styles, and frames, increasing risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Include a CSP header like 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';' to your server configuration.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of this header allows your site to be embedded in frames, exposing it to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' to your HTTP response headers.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Vulnerable JavaScript Library DetectedMedium

    Why it matters: Using jQuery 2.0.2 exposes the site to known vulnerabilities which could be exploited.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to at least version 3.5.0 to fix potential security issues.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Leaked Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: An exposed API key can allow malicious users to access Google services at your expense.

    Fix: Restrict the API key by referrer and adjust settings in the Google Cloud console to enhance security.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  6. 6

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Absence of this header can allow browsers to execute files as scripts based on their contents.

    Fix: Set the header 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' in the server configuration.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://itres.fusenv.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/sensor-line-1-high-fidelity-hyperspectral-sensor-system/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/sensor-line-2-micro-imagers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/sensor-line-3-sensors-for-space/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/airborne-surveys/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/supporting-products/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/applications/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/why-itres/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/quality-management/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/our-history/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/itres-in-the-world/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/legal/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 158 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://itres.fusenv.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/sensor-line-1-high-fidelity-hyperspectral-sensor-system/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/sensor-line-2-micro-imagers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/sensor-line-3-sensors-for-space/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/airborne-surveys/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/supporting-products/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/applications/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/why-itres/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/quality-management/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/our-history/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/itres-in-the-world/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/legal/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://itres.fusenv.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/sensor-line-1-high-fidelity-hyperspectral-sensor-system/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/sensor-line-2-micro-imagers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/sensor-line-3-sensors-for-space/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/airborne-surveys/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/supporting-products/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/applications/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/why-itres/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/quality-management/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/our-history/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/itres-in-the-world/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/legal/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://itres.fusenv.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/sensor-line-1-high-fidelity-hyperspectral-sensor-system/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/sensor-line-2-micro-imagers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/sensor-line-3-sensors-for-space/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/airborne-surveys/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/supporting-products/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/applications/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/why-itres/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/quality-management/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/our-history/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/itres-in-the-world/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://itres.fusenv.com/legal/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 2.0.2. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 2.0.2 in https://itres.fusenv.com/wp-content/themes/fluid/assets/js/modules/plugins/jque…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…Ic (39 chars) in https://itres.fusenv.com/contact/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • maps.google.com (1 script tag)
6 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 158 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    9 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of itres.fusenv.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near itres.fusenv.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling itres.fusenv.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own itres.fusenv.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming itres.fusenv.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.