Scanned sites / instamek.com / 2026-09-13-0447

instamek.com scan from 2026-09-13 04:47:26 UTC DR 29

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-13-0447

Scanned 2026-09-13 04:47:26 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 05:03:17 UTC. Found on page 2 of brave web search results

Site: https://instamek.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

81/ 100Good

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 62 pages and 140 assets of instamek.com, starting from https://instamek.com/. It scored 81 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (34), heavy assets (8), title tags (19); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−5.3), heavy assets (−4.8), title tags (−3.7). 6 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
62
Assets fetched
140
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 26
CoverageComplete crawl

202 of 202 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 79 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags19 issues
    19 of 46 pages have title issues. 5 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.7 points
  • Meta descriptions34 issues
    34 of 46 pages have meta description issues. 5 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.3 points
  • Headings5 issues
    5 of 46 pages have heading issues. 5 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.6 points
  • Broken links2 issues
    94 internal links point at 2 broken URLs.
    −0.8 points
  • Links to other sites4 issues
    4 destinations answered with an error, 35 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 79 destinations checked.
    −1.6 points
  • Redirects5 issues
    9 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses2 issues
    14 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 11 of them are pages, 2 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.4 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 46 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 5 pages noindex by design.
    −0.2 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 0 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assets8 issues
    8 assets larger than 500 KB among 140 fetched assets.
    −4.8 points
  • Orphan pages2 issues
    2 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.2 points
  • Sitemap coverage7 issues
    4 sitemaps listing 50 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 5 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 2 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.8 points
  • Internal link counts7 noted
    Internal link counts for 51 pages; 7 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 46 pages have fewer than 200 words. 5 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format3 noted
    3 of 62 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals4 noted
    4 of 51 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives51 noted
    51 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text4 noted
    4 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure14 noted
    14 of 46 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 5 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 51 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 14 response headers recorded across 202 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 51 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2342 sites, median 79%, average 78%

instamek.com scores 81%, higher than 55% of the 2342 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581160%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 108 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 116 sites83%: 100 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 87 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 65 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites81% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has several SEO issues to address, including broken links and title/meta description problems. Focusing on these areas will enhance user experience and improve rankings. Here’s a prioritized fix plan.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links negatively impact user experience and SEO.

    How: Update or remove the internal links pointing to broken URLs, specifically 'https://instamek.com/cheap-clomid-free-shipping/'.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: URLs returning errors affect accessibility and SEO.

    How: Redirect or fix the 14 URLs that do not return a 2xx response.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Title tags are crucial for SEO; many are too long.

    How: Shorten the 19 title tags exceeding 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Effective meta descriptions improve click-through rates.

    How: Create or shorten the 20 meta descriptions that are either missing or too long.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add Missing H1 Tags

    Why: H1 tags are essential for content structure and SEO.

    How: Add appropriate H1 tags to the 5 pages missing them.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Fix Sitemap Coverage Issues

    Why: Broken or redirecting URLs in the sitemap affect indexing.

    How: Update the sitemap to remove broken URLs and ensure correct URLs are listed.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lacks important security headers including HSTS and X-Frame-Options, exposing it to potential interception and clickjacking attacks. Additionally, third-party scripts are used without integrity checks, increasing vulnerability to script manipulation.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Lack of HSTSMedium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users typing the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    Fix: Implement the HSTS header by adding 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload' to your server's response headers.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of this header allows clickjacking attacks by rendering your site in frames on malicious sites.

    Fix: Add the X-Frame-Options header with the value 'DENY' or 'SAMEORIGIN' to your server's response headers.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Third-Party Scripts Without Integrity ChecksLow

    Why it matters: Using scripts from external domains without Subresource Integrity makes the site vulnerable to manipulation if those domains are compromised.

    Fix: Consider using Subresource Integrity for any third-party scripts or implement a Content Security Policy that restricts the domains from which scripts can be loaded.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://instamek.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://instamek.com/concierge/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://instamek.com/how-it-works/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://instamek.com/services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://instamek.com/services/car-maintenance/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://instamek.com/services/pre-purchase-inspection/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://instamek.com/services/car-battery-replacement/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://instamek.com/services/brake-service/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://instamek.com/cities/mechanic-calgary/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://instamek.com/cities/mechanic-edmonton/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://instamek.com/cities/mechanic-vancouver/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://instamek.com/cities/mechanic-kelowna/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://instamek.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://instamek.com/concierge/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://instamek.com/how-it-works/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://instamek.com/services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://instamek.com/services/car-maintenance/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://instamek.com/services/pre-purchase-inspection/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://instamek.com/services/car-battery-replacement/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://instamek.com/services/brake-service/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://instamek.com/cities/mechanic-calgary/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://instamek.com/cities/mechanic-edmonton/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://instamek.com/cities/mechanic-vancouver/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://instamek.com/cities/mechanic-kelowna/ → no x-frame-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • cdn.tailwindcss.com (40 script tags)
    • cdn.trustindex.io (17 script tags)
10 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 51 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 4 of 51 pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 51 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    1 form found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near instamek.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling instamek.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own instamek.com?