Scanned sites / periocentral.com

SEO report for periocentral.com DR 2

The latest Site Spider scan of periocentral.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/periocentral-com/2026-09-13-1507.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-13 15:07:25 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 15:46:39 UTC. Found on page 4 of brave web search results

Site: https://periocentral.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

81/ 100Good

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 42 pages and 408 assets of periocentral.com, starting from https://periocentral.com/. It scored 81 out of 100, a good result. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (20), indexability (16), heavy assets (7); 10 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−4.2), indexability (−4.2), heavy assets (−4.2). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
42
Assets fetched
408
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

450 of 450 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 11 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags3 issues
    3 of 21 pages have title issues. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.8 points
  • Meta descriptions20 issues
    20 of 21 pages have meta description issues. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.2 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 21 pages have heading issues. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites2 issues
    2 destinations answered with an error, 3 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 7 destinations checked.
    −0.8 points
  • Redirects4 issues
    5 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses5 noted
    5 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 4 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability16 issues
    16 of 21 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 17 pages noindex by design. 16 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −4.2 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 189 image references have no alt attribute. 179 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets7 issues
    7 assets larger than 500 KB among 408 fetched assets.
    −4.2 points
  • Orphan pages7 issues
    7 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.7 points
  • Sitemap coverage24 issues
    4 sitemaps listing 36 URLs: 1 crawled page missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 7 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −3.8 points
  • Internal link counts18 noted
    Internal link counts for 38 pages; 18 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 21 pages have fewer than 200 words. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format7 noted
    7 of 42 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 38 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives38 noted
    38 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text3 noted
    3 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure16 noted
    16 of 21 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length7 noted
    7 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 38 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 450 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 38 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 50 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2342 sites, median 79%, average 78%

periocentral.com scores 81%, higher than 55% of the 2342 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581160%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 108 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 116 sites83%: 100 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 87 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 65 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites81% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Several issues were found that can improve site performance and SEO. Prioritize fixing redirects, non-200 responses, and address title and meta description issues for better visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Eliminating unnecessary redirects can improve page load speed and user experience.

    How: Update or remove the five redirecting URLs to point directly to the intended final URLs.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Ensuring all URLs return a 2xx response is vital for indexing and user accessibility.

    How: Check the five non-200 URLs and ensure they are available without redirects or errors.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Improving title tags enhances click-through rates and visibility in search results.

    How: Revise the three pages with title issues to ensure they meet length guidelines and are descriptive.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Including unique and compelling meta descriptions can boost search visibility and CTR.

    How: Add or improve meta descriptions for the 20 pages with issues to align with SEO best practices.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Reduce Heavy Assets

    Why: Lowering the size of heavy assets can improve loading speed and overall site performance.

    How: Optimize the seven assets larger than 500 KB by compressing images and minifying CSS.

    Checks: heavy-assets

  6. 6

    Link Orphan Pages

    Why: Connecting orphan pages will enhance user navigation and improve SEO value.

    How: Add internal links from relevant pages to the seven orphan pages.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has some important security gaps, mainly the lack of HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) headers, which could make users vulnerable to attacks. Additionally, integrating third-party scripts without adequate safeguards poses a risk. Implementing the recommended fixes will help enhance your site's security.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users entering the site via HTTP may be vulnerable to interception on their first request.

    Fix: Implement the HSTS header by adding 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload' to your web server configuration.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Third-party Scripts Without Subresource Integrity (SRI)Low

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains can alter your site if those domains are compromised, as they lack integrity checks.

    Fix: Use Subresource Integrity for the scripts or implement a Content-Security-Policy that specifies and controls these domains.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://periocentral.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://periocentral.com/contact/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://periocentral.com/referral-hub/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://periocentral.com/meet-the-doctors/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://periocentral.com/meet-the-team/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://periocentral.com/your-consultation/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://periocentral.com/finance-insurance/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://periocentral.com/new-patient-forms/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://periocentral.com/pre-op-instruction/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://periocentral.com/post-surgery-instruction/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://periocentral.com/services/what-is-periodontal-disease/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://periocentral.com/services/periodontal-treatments/ → no strict-transport-security
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • website-widgets.pages.dev (38 script tags)
    • cdn.jotfor.ms (1 script tag)
11 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 38 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 38 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 38 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    2 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of periocentral.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near periocentral.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling periocentral.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own periocentral.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming periocentral.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.