Scanned sites / indietool.io / 2026-10-24-1318
indietool.io scan from 2026-10-24 13:18:26 UTC DR 44
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
Scan 2026-10-24-1318
Scanned 2026-10-24 13:18:26 UTC, finished 2026-10-24 13:43:14 UTC. Found with 42backlinks.com tool directory
Site: https://indietool.io/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On October 24, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 2051 pages and 996 assets of indietool.io, starting from https://indietool.io/. It scored 91 out of 100, an excellent result. 13 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by headings (1,680), heavy assets (2), title tags (206); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to headings (−4.9), heavy assets (−1.2), title tags (−1). 11 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium2 medium, 3 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 2051
- Assets fetched
- 996
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 13 of 33
3,047 of 3,058 discovered URLs were fetched, 11 blocked by robots.txt, 698 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 2067 left unchecked.
- Title tags206 issues206 of 2012 pages have title issues. 27 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−1 points
- Meta descriptions172 issues172 of 2012 pages have meta description issues. 27 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−0.7 points
- Headings1,680 issues1680 of 2012 pages have heading issues. 27 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−4.9 points
- Broken links6 issues234 internal links point at 6 broken URLs.−0.1 points
- Links to other sites7 issues7 destinations answered with an error, 52 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 2067 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.−0.1 points
- Redirects3 issues9 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
- Non-200 responses6 issues15 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 12 of them are pages, 6 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- Indexability69 issues69 of 2038 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design.−0.3 points
- Image alt textOK0 of 54697 image references have no alt attribute.
- Heavy assets2 issues2 assets larger than 500 KB among 996 fetched assets.−1.2 points
- Orphan pages167 issues167 pages have no internal links pointing at them.−0.3 points
- Sitemap coverage300 issues1 sitemap listing 1890 URLs: 129 crawled pages missing, 4 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 167 reachable only via the sitemap.−0.9 points
- Internal link counts64 notedInternal link counts for 500 pages; 64 worth a look.
- Thin content3 issues3 of 2012 pages have fewer than 200 words. 27 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Duplicate content3 issues1 group of pages with identical HTML.
- URL format132 noted132 of 2051 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
- Canonicals70 noted70 of 2039 pages have a canonical worth checking.
- Robots directives3 noted3 pages carry a robots directive; 2036 carry none.
- Anchor textOKEvery internal link has descriptive, followed anchor text.
- Title and heading structure1,761 noted1761 of 2012 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 27 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Image weight and alt length155 noted6 images over 100 KB; 149 with alt text over 100 characters.
- Response anomaliesOKNo redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
- HTML and head validationOKAll 2039 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
- hreflangOKNo page declares hreflang.
- Structured data1,679 noted1882 of 2012 indexable pages carry structured data: FAQPage (1809), Question (1809), Answer (1809), Offer (1808), SoftwareApplication (1680). 1679 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
- Near duplicates47 noted47 pages in 4 groups read almost the same as another page (95% alike or more).
- Soft 404s4 noted4 pages answer 200 but say they are not there.
- AccessibilityNot checkedNot checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
- Link positions74 noted74 of 1847 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
- PaginationOKNo page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
- Headers and cookiesOK0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 3047 URLs.
- Orphans in searchNot checkedNot checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
- Link ScoreOKLink Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 2039 pages; 1920 hold almost none (10 or less).
- JavaScript renderingNot checkedNot checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
- PageSpeed InsightsNot checkedNot checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
- Spelling924 noted924 words an English dictionary does not know, on 1948 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.
Where this scan sits among all scanned sites
2314 sites, median 79%, average 78%
indietool.io scores 91%, higher than 90% of the 2314 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsYour site displays a solid health score with minor issues requiring attention. Focus on fixing broken links, resolving non-200 responses, improving titles and meta descriptions, addressing heading issues, and enhancing indexability.
- 1
Fix Broken Links
Why: 234 internal links point to broken URLs, negatively impacting user experience and SEO.
How: Identify the broken links and either update them to point to the correct pages or remove them.
Checks: broken-links
- 2
Resolve Non-200 Responses
Why: 15 URLs did not return a 2xx response, which can harm user access and SEO rankings.
How: Check the listed URLs and ensure they return a proper 200 status, fixing or redirecting as needed.
Checks: status-codes
- 3
Improve Title Tags
Why: 206 titles have issues, affecting search visibility and click-through rates.
How: Revise titles to be under 60 characters, eliminate duplicates, and ensure they are relevant.
Checks: titles
- 4
Enhance Meta Descriptions
Why: 172 meta descriptions have issues, which can lower CTRs on search results.
How: Revise meta descriptions to add keywords and fit within 155 characters, ensuring uniqueness.
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 5
Fix Heading Issues
Why: 1680 pages have heading problems, which can confuse search engines about page structure.
How: Ensure each page has a single H1 tag and use H2-H6 appropriately to structure content.
Checks: headings
- 6
Address Indexability Warnings
Why: 69 indexable pages have warnings, which can affect their visibility in search results.
How: Review each page for proper canonical tags and robots.txt instructions.
Checks: indexability
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlYour website has several security headers missing, which could expose it to various attacks. Addressing these issues will help improve your site's security posture and protect user data.
- 0 high
- 2 medium
- 3 low
- 1 info
- 1
Missing Content Security PolicyMedium
Why it matters: Without a Content Security Policy, the site is vulnerable to cross-site scripting attacks.
Fix: Add a Content-Security-Policy header: `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';`
Evidence: Content Security Policy
- 2
Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium
Why it matters: Lack of X-Frame-Options allows clickjacking attacks where a malicious site can overlay your content.
Fix: Add an X-Frame-Options header: `X-Frame-Options: DENY`.
Evidence: Clickjacking protection
- 3
Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow
Why it matters: Absence of this header may allow browsers to execute files as scripts based on content instead of type.
Fix: Add an X-Content-Type-Options header: `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff`.
Evidence: MIME sniffing protection
- 4
Missing Referrer-Policy HeaderLow
Why it matters: Not specifying a Referrer-Policy exposes user navigation paths across sites.
Fix: Add a Referrer-Policy header: `Referrer-Policy: no-referrer`.
Evidence: Referrer policy
- 5
Server Banner DisclosureLow
Why it matters: Exposing framework names can provide attackers with information on potential vulnerabilities.
Fix: Consider removing the X-Powered-By header or hiding specific details: `X-Powered-By: <hidden>`.
Evidence: Software version disclosure
- 6
Missing Permissions-Policy HeaderInfo
Why it matters: Without this header, all browser features are available to any scripts executed, increasing risk if the site is compromised.
Fix: Add a Permissions-Policy header: `Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(), microphone=(), camera=()`.
Evidence: Permissions policy
What the checks found
- FoundContent Security PolicyMedium
None of the 2039 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.
- https://www.indietool.io/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/apps → no content-security-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/tools → no content-security-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/blog → no content-security-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/free-product-hunt-alternatives → no content-security-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/free-reddit-communities-to-launch-startup → no content-security-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/docs → no content-security-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/indietool/engineeringonweb-com → no content-security-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/indietool/3dhouseplanner-com → no content-security-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/indietool/proclipper-app → no content-security-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/indietool/opentag-build → no content-security-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/indietool/databasin-ai → no content-security-policy
- FoundClickjacking protectionMedium
No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.
- https://www.indietool.io/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.indietool.io/apps → no x-frame-options
- https://www.indietool.io/tools → no x-frame-options
- https://www.indietool.io/blog → no x-frame-options
- https://www.indietool.io/free-product-hunt-alternatives → no x-frame-options
- https://www.indietool.io/free-reddit-communities-to-launch-startup → no x-frame-options
- https://www.indietool.io/docs → no x-frame-options
- https://www.indietool.io/indietool/engineeringonweb-com → no x-frame-options
- https://www.indietool.io/indietool/3dhouseplanner-com → no x-frame-options
- https://www.indietool.io/indietool/proclipper-app → no x-frame-options
- https://www.indietool.io/indietool/opentag-build → no x-frame-options
- https://www.indietool.io/indietool/databasin-ai → no x-frame-options
- FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow
No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.
- https://www.indietool.io/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.indietool.io/apps → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.indietool.io/tools → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.indietool.io/blog → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.indietool.io/free-product-hunt-alternatives → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.indietool.io/free-reddit-communities-to-launch-startup → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.indietool.io/docs → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.indietool.io/indietool/engineeringonweb-com → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.indietool.io/indietool/3dhouseplanner-com → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.indietool.io/indietool/proclipper-app → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.indietool.io/indietool/opentag-build → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.indietool.io/indietool/databasin-ai → no x-content-type-options
- FoundReferrer policyLow
No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.
- https://www.indietool.io/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/apps → no referrer-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/tools → no referrer-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/blog → no referrer-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/free-product-hunt-alternatives → no referrer-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/free-reddit-communities-to-launch-startup → no referrer-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/docs → no referrer-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/indietool/engineeringonweb-com → no referrer-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/indietool/3dhouseplanner-com → no referrer-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/indietool/proclipper-app → no referrer-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/indietool/opentag-build → no referrer-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/indietool/databasin-ai → no referrer-policy
- FoundPermissions policyInfo
No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.
- https://www.indietool.io/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/apps → no permissions-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/tools → no permissions-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/blog → no permissions-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/free-product-hunt-alternatives → no permissions-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/free-reddit-communities-to-launch-startup → no permissions-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/docs → no permissions-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/indietool/engineeringonweb-com → no permissions-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/indietool/3dhouseplanner-com → no permissions-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/indietool/proclipper-app → no permissions-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/indietool/opentag-build → no permissions-policy
- https://www.indietool.io/indietool/databasin-ai → no permissions-policy
- NoteSoftware version disclosure
Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.
- server: Vercel (3047 responses)
- x-powered-by: Next.js (2044 responses)
8 checks passed, 2 not applicable
- OKHTTPS
All 2039 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKHTTP Strict Transport Security
strict-transport-security is set on all 2039 HTML pages.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKForms over HTTPS
104 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
- OKThird-party scripts
The sampled pages load no scripts from other domains.
- OKSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.
- Not applicableCookie flags
The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.
- Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries
No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
Sites scoring near indietool.io
Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.
- sacryelectric.comDR 092/100 · rank 146 · 85 pages
- sgvet.comDR 692/100 · rank 146 · 33 pages
- outlookoptometry.comDR 392/100 · rank 146 · 13 pages
- yoast.comDR 9191/100 · rank 184 · 929 pages
- www.bbatraining.ieDR 091/100 · rank 184 · 14 pages
- royaloakphysio.caDR 1491/100 · rank 184 · 283 pages
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling indietool.io from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.
Own indietool.io?
- Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
- Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming indietool.io. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.