Scanned sites / hamptonsanimalhospital.com / 2026-09-14-1203

hamptonsanimalhospital.com scan from 2026-09-14 12:03:35 UTC DR 66

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-14-1203

Scanned 2026-09-14 12:03:35 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 12:07:04 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

90/ 100Excellent

On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 21 pages and 205 assets of hamptonsanimalhospital.com, starting from https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/. It scored 90 out of 100, an excellent result. 7 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by thin content (5), sitemap coverage (6), meta descriptions (4); 10 checks passed. Most of the points went to thin content (−2), sitemap coverage (−1.8), meta descriptions (−1.6). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
21
Assets fetched
205
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
7 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

226 of 226 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 8 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags3 issues
    3 of 17 pages have title issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.5 points
  • Meta descriptions4 issues
    4 of 17 pages have meta description issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.6 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 17 pages have heading issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites41 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 3 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 8 destinations checked.
  • Redirects2 noted
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses2 noted
    2 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 17 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 3 pages noindex by design. 2 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −1 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 70 image references have no alt attribute. 1 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets2 issues
    2 assets larger than 500 KB among 205 fetched assets. 1 document over that size is listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −1.2 points
  • Orphan pages5 issues
    5 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −1 points
  • Sitemap coverage6 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 20 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 3 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.8 points
  • Internal link counts1 noted
    Internal link counts for 20 pages; 1 worth a look.
  • Thin content5 issues
    5 of 17 pages have fewer than 200 words. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 21 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 20 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives20 noted
    20 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text2 noted
    2 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure6 noted
    6 of 17 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 20 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 14 response headers recorded across 226 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 20 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 68 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2494 sites, median 80%, average 78%

hamptonsanimalhospital.com scores 90%, higher than 88% of the 2494 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0591180%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 8 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 28 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 36 sites68%: 37 sites69%: 49 sites70%: 48 sites71%: 73 sites72%: 72 sites73%: 74 sites74%: 72 sites75%: 75 sites76%: 88 sites77%: 99 sites78%: 112 sites79%: 98 sites80%: 118 sites81%: 111 sites82%: 112 sites83%: 112 sites84%: 116 sites85%: 94 sites86%: 78 sites87%: 85 sites88%: 60 sites89%: 70 sites90%: 45 sites91%: 52 sites92%: 40 sites93%: 27 sites94%: 21 sites95%: 13 sites96%: 14 sites97%: 14 sites98%: 6 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites90% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has a strong health score, with some issues that can improve SEO performance. Prioritize fixing redirects, non-200 responses, title and meta description issues, and addressing thin content. These changes will enhance visibility and user experience.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirects can affect user experience and SEO ranking.

    How: Update the sitemap to point to the final URL of the checkout and remove unnecessary redirects.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Ensure all URLs return a 200 status for better accessibility.

    How: Replace or remove the URLs returning a 302 status, ensuring they point to properly indexed pages.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Update Title Tags

    Why: Long titles can dilute SEO effectiveness.

    How: Shorten titles to under 60 characters for affected pages.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Missing descriptions reduce click-through rates.

    How: Add compelling meta descriptions for the affected pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Revise Orphan Pages

    Why: Orphan pages are not indexed effectively, hindering SEO.

    How: Link these pages within the main content of your site to increase visibility.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  6. 6

    Enhance Thin Content

    Why: Pages with low word count can rank poorly.

    How: Add valuable content to thin pages, aiming for 200+ words.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security issues that need attention, including missing headers that protect against common threats like clickjacking and MIME sniffing, and a leaked API key. Addressing these will help improve your site's security.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users may connect over HTTP, exposing them to interception.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of this header allows clickjacking attacks by embedding your pages in iframes.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY or use Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors 'none'

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Leaked Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: An exposed API key can lead to unauthorized use of your Google services.

    Fix: Restrict this key in the Google Cloud console by HTTP referrer.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may incorrectly interpret files, leading to security risks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-Party Scripts Lack Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from other domains can change if those domains are compromised.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) for third-party scripts or a Content-Security-Policy whitelist.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/shop/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/new-patients/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/veterinary-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/spaying-neutering/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/pet-dentist/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/pet-vaccinations/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/blog/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/contact-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/faq/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/2019/06/importance-of-spaying-and-neutering-your-pet/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    2 of 20 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/shop/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/new-patients/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/veterinary-services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/spaying-neutering/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/pet-dentist/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/pet-vaccinations/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/blog/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/contact-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/faq/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/2019/06/importance-of-spaying-and-neutering-your-pet/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/shop/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/new-patients/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/veterinary-services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/spaying-neutering/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/pet-dentist/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/pet-vaccinations/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/blog/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/contact-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/faq/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/2019/06/importance-of-spaying-and-neutering-your-pet/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…t8 (39 chars) in https://hamptonsanimalhospital.com/contact-us/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • img1.wsimg.com (20 script tags)
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 20 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 2 of 20 pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    24 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near hamptonsanimalhospital.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling hamptonsanimalhospital.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own hamptonsanimalhospital.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming hamptonsanimalhospital.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.