Scanned sites / markbochinskidental.ca

SEO report for markbochinskidental.ca DR 0

The latest Site Spider scan of markbochinskidental.ca, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/markbochinskidental-ca/2026-09-14-0742.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-14 07:42:50 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 07:45:51 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://markbochinskidental.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

90/ 100Excellent

On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 26 pages and 262 assets of markbochinskidental.ca, starting from https://markbochinskidental.ca/. It scored 90 out of 100, an excellent result. 7 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (24), title tags (2), headings (3); 10 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−7.4), title tags (−0.8), headings (−0.7). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
26
Assets fetched
262
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
7 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

288 of 289 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 12 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags2 issues
    2 of 25 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −0.8 points
  • Meta descriptions24 issues
    24 of 25 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −7.4 points
  • Headings3 issues
    3 of 25 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −0.7 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites54 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 4 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 9 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 noted
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses16 noted
    16 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 0 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 26 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.4 points
  • Image alt text5 issues
    5 of 122 image references have no alt attribute. 23 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.2 points
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 262 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.2 points
  • Sitemap coverage1 issue
    4 sitemaps listing 25 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.2 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 26 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 25 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format2 noted
    2 of 26 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 26 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives26 noted
    26 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure20 noted
    20 of 25 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length16 noted
    16 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 26 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 288 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 26 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 77 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2488 sites, median 80%, average 78%

markbochinskidental.ca scores 90%, higher than 88% of the 2488 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0591180%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 8 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 28 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 36 sites68%: 36 sites69%: 49 sites70%: 48 sites71%: 73 sites72%: 72 sites73%: 73 sites74%: 72 sites75%: 75 sites76%: 88 sites77%: 99 sites78%: 112 sites79%: 97 sites80%: 118 sites81%: 111 sites82%: 112 sites83%: 112 sites84%: 115 sites85%: 94 sites86%: 77 sites87%: 84 sites88%: 60 sites89%: 70 sites90%: 45 sites91%: 52 sites92%: 40 sites93%: 27 sites94%: 21 sites95%: 13 sites96%: 14 sites97%: 14 sites98%: 6 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites90% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has a strong health score, but there are a few critical areas to improve. Focus on resolving non-200 responses and enhancing title and meta description quality for better SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: 16 URLs are returning errors, which can harm user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify the faulty URLs (404 errors) and update or remove links to these resources. Ensure the sitemap points to valid URLs.

    Checks: status-codes

  2. 2

    Enhance Title Tags

    Why: 2 pages have overly long title tags that can affect ranking.

    How: Shorten the titles on identified pages to under 60 characters for better SEO.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 22 pages have missing or short meta descriptions affecting Click-Through Rate (CTR).

    How: Create unique meta descriptions for each identified page, ensuring they are between 50-160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Add Missing H1 Headings

    Why: 3 pages are missing H1 tags, which are essential for SEO.

    How: Add a clear H1 heading to each of the affected pages to improve structure.

    Checks: headings

  5. 5

    Add Alt Text for Images

    Why: 5 images lack alt text; adding it improves accessibility and SEO.

    How: Provide descriptive alt attributes for the identified images.

    Checks: images-alt

  6. 6

    Link to Orphan Page

    Why: 1 page has no internal links, limiting its visibility.

    How: Add internal links from relevant pages to the orphaned page, allowing better indexing.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several security issues that could expose visitors to risks, including the lack of security-related headers and the use of an outdated JavaScript library. Applying recommended fixes will enhance overall security.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users accessing the site without HTTPS could be intercepted.

    Fix: Add 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains' header to all HTML pages.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows scripts from any source, increasing XSS risk.

    Fix: Add 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';' header to all HTML pages.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Without X-Frame-Options, the site can be embedded in iframes on malicious sites.

    Fix: Add 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' header to all HTML pages.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Outdated jQuery LibraryMedium

    Why it matters: jQuery 1.12.4 has known vulnerabilities that could be exploited.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later to mitigate vulnerabilities.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Lack of X-Content-Type-Options may allow the browser to run scripts incorrectly.

    Fix: Add 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' header to all HTML pages.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    5 of 26 HTML pages send strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/virtual-tour/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/new-patients/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/appointments/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/your-first-visit/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/online-forms/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/dental-plan/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/labs/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/dental-insurance/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/general-dentistry/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/cosmetic-dentistry/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/restorative-dentistry/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 26 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/about/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/our-staff/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/virtual-tour/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/new-patients/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/appointments/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/your-first-visit/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/online-forms/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/dental-plan/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/labs/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/dental-insurance/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/services/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/about/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/our-staff/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/virtual-tour/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/new-patients/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/appointments/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/your-first-visit/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/online-forms/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/dental-plan/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/labs/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/dental-insurance/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/services/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/about/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/our-staff/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/virtual-tour/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/new-patients/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/appointments/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/your-first-visit/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/online-forms/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/dental-plan/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/labs/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/dental-insurance/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://markbochinskidental.ca/services/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.12.4. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.12.4 in https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.12.4/jquery.min.js?ver=1.12.4: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • ajax.googleapis.com (26 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (26 script tags)
    • form.jotform.com (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 26 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    4 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of markbochinskidental.ca

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near markbochinskidental.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling markbochinskidental.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own markbochinskidental.ca?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming markbochinskidental.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.