Scanned sites / greatplainschiro.com / 2026-09-13-0917

greatplainschiro.com scan from 2026-09-13 09:17:44 UTC DR 1

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-13-0917

Scanned 2026-09-13 09:17:44 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 10:52:36 UTC. Found on page 5 of brave web search results

Site: https://greatplainschiro.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

78/ 100Good

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 84 pages and 321 assets of greatplainschiro.com, starting from https://greatplainschiro.com/. It scored 78 out of 100, a good result. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (79), heavy assets (47), title tags (33); 11 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−7.7), heavy assets (−6), title tags (−4). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
84
Assets fetched
321
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

405 of 405 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 30 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags33 issues
    33 of 82 pages have title issues.
    −4 points
  • Meta descriptions79 issues
    79 of 82 pages have meta description issues.
    −7.7 points
  • Headings38 issues
    38 of 82 pages have heading issues.
    −2.8 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites4 issues
    4 destinations answered with an error, 10 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 29 destinations checked.
    −1.6 points
  • Redirects2 issues
    3 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses18 noted
    18 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 2 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 82 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt text7 issues
    7 of 392 image references have no alt attribute. 52 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.1 points
  • Heavy assets47 issues
    47 assets larger than 500 KB among 321 fetched assets. 1 document over that size is listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage3 issues
    4 sitemaps listing 79 URLs: 3 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.2 points
  • Internal link counts3 noted
    Internal link counts for 82 pages; 3 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 82 pages have fewer than 200 words.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 84 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 82 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives82 noted
    82 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text38 noted
    38 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure45 noted
    45 of 82 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length61 noted
    61 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 82 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 405 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 82 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 80 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2860 sites, median 80%, average 79%

greatplainschiro.com scores 78%, higher than 39% of the 2860 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751490%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 42 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 79 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 108 sites78%: 131 sites79%: 110 sites80%: 127 sites81%: 124 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 120 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 107 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 94 sites88%: 81 sites89%: 76 sites90%: 54 sites91%: 58 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 149 sites78% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has several SEO issues, especially with titles, meta descriptions, and headings. Prioritizing these fixes will improve search engine visibility and user engagement.

  1. 1

    Fix Title Tag Issues

    Why: 33 pages have title issues affecting SEO and user experience.

    How: Shorten titles to under 60 characters and ensure they are descriptive.

    Checks: titles

  2. 2

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 79 pages have meta description issues, impacting click-through rates.

    How: Craft concise meta descriptions under 160 characters for each page.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  3. 3

    Add Missing H1 Tags

    Why: 38 pages are missing H1 tags, which are crucial for SEO.

    How: Ensure each page has a unique and descriptive H1 tag.

    Checks: headings

  4. 4

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 18 pages are returning errors, affecting user access.

    How: Fix the identified 404 errors and consider updating redirects.

    Checks: status-codes, redirects

  5. 5

    Add Alt Text for Images

    Why: 7 images lack alt attributes which are important for accessibility.

    How: Add descriptive alt text to every referenced image.

    Checks: images-alt

  6. 6

    Update Sitemap Coverage

    Why: 3 crawled pages are missing from the sitemap, decreasing visibility.

    How: Add these pages to your sitemap and ensure ongoing updates.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lacks essential security headers and uses a vulnerable version of jQuery, posing risks to its security. Implementing a Content Security Policy and Clickjacking protection is critical. Upgrading jQuery is also necessary to mitigate known vulnerabilities.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Without a CSP, the site is susceptible to XSS and data injection attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Lacking this header allows clickjacking attacks as the site can be framed by untrusted sites.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY;

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Vulnerable jQuery LibraryMedium

    Why it matters: Using jQuery 1.12.4 exposes the site to several vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: This allows browsers to misinterpret file types, potentially leading to security issues.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff;

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 82 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://greatplainschiro.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/appointments/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/about/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/about/meet-the-doctors/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/new-patients/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/new-patients/your-first-visit/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/new-patients/what-to-expect/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/new-patients/payment-options/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/new-patients/online-forms/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/services/diversified-technique/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://greatplainschiro.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/appointments/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/about/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/about/meet-the-doctors/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/blog/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/new-patients/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/new-patients/your-first-visit/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/new-patients/what-to-expect/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/new-patients/payment-options/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/new-patients/online-forms/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/services/diversified-technique/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://greatplainschiro.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/appointments/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/about/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/about/meet-the-doctors/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/blog/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/new-patients/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/new-patients/your-first-visit/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/new-patients/what-to-expect/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/new-patients/payment-options/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/new-patients/online-forms/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://greatplainschiro.com/services/diversified-technique/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.12.4. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.12.4 in https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.12.4/jquery.min.js?ver=1.12.4: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 4 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • ajax.googleapis.com (40 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • firebasestorage.googleapis.com (40 script tags)
    • cdn.trustindex.io (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 82 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 82 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    3 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near greatplainschiro.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling greatplainschiro.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own greatplainschiro.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming greatplainschiro.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.