Scanned sites / grantlandscapes.com / 2026-09-12-1831

grantlandscapes.com scan from 2026-09-12 18:31:53 UTC DR 0

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-12-1831

Scanned 2026-09-12 18:31:53 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 19:03:19 UTC. Found on page 4 of brave web search results

Site: https://grantlandscapes.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

70/ 100Needs work

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 26 pages and 151 assets of grantlandscapes.com, starting from https://grantlandscapes.com/. It scored 70 out of 100, a result that needs work. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (15), meta descriptions (15), thin content (14); 10 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−8.8), meta descriptions (−7.1), thin content (−6.6). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
26
Assets fetched
151
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

177 of 183 discovered URLs were fetched, 6 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 2 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags15 issues
    15 of 15 pages have title issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −8.8 points
  • Meta descriptions15 issues
    15 of 15 pages have meta description issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −7.1 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 15 pages have heading issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.4 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sitesOK
    0 destinations answered with an error, of 2 destinations checked.
  • Redirects9 issues
    10 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −2.1 points
  • Non-200 responses10 noted
    10 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 9 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 15 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 2 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt text18 issues
    18 of 50 image references have no alt attribute. 32 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −2.2 points
  • Heavy assets2 issues
    2 assets larger than 500 KB among 151 fetched assets.
    −1.2 points
  • Orphan pages3 issues
    3 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.7 points
  • Sitemap coverage4 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 14 URLs: 1 crawled page missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 3 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.4 points
  • Internal link counts3 noted
    Internal link counts for 17 pages; 3 worth a look.
  • Thin content14 issues
    14 of 15 pages have fewer than 200 words. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.6 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 26 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals2 noted
    2 of 17 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives17 noted
    17 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor textOK
    Every internal link has descriptive, followed anchor text.
  • Title and heading structure15 noted
    15 of 15 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length9 noted
    9 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies9 noted
    9 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 17 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 177 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 17 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsOK
    Mobile performance 100 on average across 5 pages; 0 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

grantlandscapes.com scores 70%, higher than 16% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites70% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site's health needs improvement. Address the 10 non-200 responses and fix title/meta description issues for better SEO. Focus on adding headings and improving alt text to enhance accessibility and search visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: These URLs aren't returning a successful status, affecting user experience and SEO.

    How: Ensure all pages return a 200 status. Update any redirects properly.

    Checks: status-codes

  2. 2

    Update Title Tags

    Why: Title tags are too short, impacting rankings. Proper titles improve click-through rate.

    How: Revise titles to be more descriptive and at least 30 characters.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions are often missing or too short, decreasing visibility in search results.

    How: Create compelling meta descriptions for all pages, ensuring they are under 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Add Missing H1 Headings

    Why: H1 heading is crucial for SEO and structure; one page lacks it.

    How: Add a relevant H1 tag to the page missing it.

    Checks: headings

  5. 5

    Improve Image Alt Text

    Why: Images without alt text can hinder accessibility and SEO.

    How: Add descriptive alt text to all 18 images lacking it.

    Checks: images-alt

  6. 6

    Link to Orphan Pages

    Why: Orphan pages do not receive internal link equity and are harder for users to find.

    How: Include links to these pages in relevant sections of your site.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several security vulnerabilities, including missing HTTP Strict Transport Security and clickjacking protection, which could expose users to interception and attacks. Implementing recommended headers will enhance security and protect users effectively.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, initial HTTP requests can be intercepted.

    Fix: Add 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload' to response headers.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Lack of Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Missing X-Frame-Options allows embedding in frames, risking malicious overlays.

    Fix: Add 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' or use a CSP frame-ancestors directive.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Without X-Content-Type-Options, browsers may execute files based on content types.

    Fix: Add 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' to response headers.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  4. 4

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Lack of SRI means vulnerabilities in third-party scripts can risk site integrity.

    Fix: Include Subresource Integrity attributes for scripts from external domains.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Sensitive Path in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: robots.txt lists a path that appears private and may expose sensitive information.

    Fix: Ensure proper access control for '/wp-admin/' or remove it from robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://grantlandscapes.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/design/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/xeriscaping/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/landscape-lighting/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/hardscapes/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/edging-installation/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/irrigation-systems/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/contact-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/wp-login.php → no strict-transport-security
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/terms-of-service/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/privacy-policy/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    2 of 17 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://grantlandscapes.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/design/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/xeriscaping/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/landscape-lighting/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/hardscapes/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/edging-installation/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/irrigation-systems/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/contact-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/terms-of-service/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/privacy-policy/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/2018/01/24/hello-world/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://grantlandscapes.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/design/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/xeriscaping/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/landscape-lighting/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/hardscapes/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/edging-installation/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/irrigation-systems/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/contact-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/wp-login.php → no x-content-type-options
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/terms-of-service/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://grantlandscapes.com/privacy-policy/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.google.com (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 17 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 2 of 17 pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    3 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near grantlandscapes.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling grantlandscapes.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own grantlandscapes.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming grantlandscapes.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.