Scanned sites / greatdividept.com

SEO report for greatdividept.com DR 1

The latest Site Spider scan of greatdividept.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/greatdividept-com/2026-09-12-0626.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-12 06:26:51 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 10:00:17 UTC

Site: https://greatdividept.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

70/ 100Needs work

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 198 pages and 549 assets of greatdividept.com, starting from https://greatdividept.com/. It scored 70 out of 100, a result that needs work. 12 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (138), heavy assets (59), thin content (110); 6 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6.2), heavy assets (−6), thin content (−4.9). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: High1 high, 4 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
198
Assets fetched
549
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

747 of 753 discovered URLs were fetched, 6 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 33 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags35 issues
    35 of 138 pages have title issues. 41 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2 points
  • Meta descriptions138 issues
    138 of 138 pages have meta description issues. 41 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.2 points
  • Headings77 issues
    77 of 138 pages have heading issues. 41 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.6 points
  • Broken links1 issue
    9 internal links point at 1 broken URL.
    −0.1 points
  • Links to other sites3 issues
    3 destinations answered with an error, 11 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 28 destinations checked.
    −0.7 points
  • Redirects20 issues
    106 redirecting URLs, 2 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses1 issue
    107 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 19 of them are pages, 1 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 172 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 7 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt text15 issues
    15 of 152 image references have no alt attribute. 119 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.6 points
  • Heavy assets59 issues
    59 assets larger than 500 KB among 549 fetched assets. 4 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages106 issues
    106 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −2.4 points
  • Sitemap coverage110 issues
    9 sitemaps listing 161 URLs: 3 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 106 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −3.7 points
  • Internal link counts7 noted
    Internal link counts for 179 pages; 7 worth a look.
  • Thin content110 issues
    110 of 138 pages have fewer than 200 words. 41 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.9 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format32 noted
    32 of 198 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals41 noted
    41 of 179 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives179 noted
    179 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text5 noted
    5 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure61 noted
    61 of 138 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 41 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length50 noted
    50 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies103 noted
    103 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 179 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 747 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 179 pages; 155 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 71 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

greatdividept.com scores 70%, higher than 16% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites70% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website has several technical issues that need addressing to improve its SEO health. Prioritize fixing the broken links, redirects, and non-200 responses to enhance user experience and site authority. Updating title tags and meta descriptions will also help improve visibility. Lastly, consider linking orphan pages.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Correct broken links to improve user experience and SEO.

    How: Update links pointing to the broken URL or remove references.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Reduce Redirects

    Why: Minimize redirects to improve page load speed and user experience.

    How: Remove unnecessary redirects and fix any chained redirects.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: Fix non-200 pages to ensure all URLs are accessible.

    How: Check URLs returning errors and update their status as needed.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Update Title Tags

    Why: Improve title tags for better search visibility.

    How: Shorten long titles and remove duplicates.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Enhance meta descriptions for better click-through rates.

    How: Write unique and concise descriptions for all pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Link Orphan Pages

    Why: Increase visibility of orphan pages within the site.

    How: Add internal links to orphan pages from relevant content.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The security review of greatdividept.com reveals significant vulnerabilities due to inadequate protection for users' data. The site serves many pages over HTTP instead of HTTPS, lacks important security headers, and uses outdated JavaScript libraries. Immediate action is necessary to enhance security and protect user information.

  • 1 high
  • 4 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    HTTP Pages DetectedHigh

    Why it matters: 167 pages transmitted data over plain HTTP, exposing user information to interception.

    Fix: Implement HTTPS sitewide, redirect HTTP traffic to HTTPS.

    Evidence: HTTPS

  2. 2

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors could be vulnerable to interception during their first request.

    Fix: Add the header 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains' to all pages served over HTTPS.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of this header can lead to clickjacking attacks, allowing malicious framing of your pages.

    Fix: Add 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' to all HTML responses.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Forms Exposed Over HTTPMedium

    Why it matters: Forms on HTTP pages can expose user input to interception by malicious actors.

    Fix: Ensure all forms are served over HTTPS, implementing redirects for HTTP pages.

    Evidence: Forms over HTTPS

  5. 5

    Vulnerable JavaScript LibrariesMedium

    Why it matters: Using outdated versions of jQuery increases the risk of exploitation via known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later to mitigate identified vulnerabilities.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  6. 6

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: This omission could allow browsers to misinterpret files as scripts, leading to security risks.

    Fix: Include 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' in the HTTP response headers for all HTML pages.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  7. 7

    Mixed Content DetectedLow

    Why it matters: Some resources are served over HTTP on HTTPS pages, creating security vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Update links to use HTTPS instead of HTTP for all resources.

    Evidence: Mixed content

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTPSHigh

    167 pages answered 200 over plain HTTP with no redirect to HTTPS, while 12 were served over HTTPS. Anyone on the network path can read or alter these pages.

    • http://greatdividept.com/patient-forms/ → 200 over http
    • http://greatdividept.com/insurance-payments/ → 200 over http
    • http://greatdividept.com/information-for-physicians/ → 200 over http
    • http://greatdividept.com/blog/ → 200 over http
    • http://greatdividept.com/use-heat-ice/ → 200 over http
    • http://greatdividept.com/posture/ → 200 over http
    • http://greatdividept.com/visceral-manipulation/ → 200 over http
    • http://greatdividept.com/nominated-missoulas-choice-best-physcial-therapist/ → 200 over http
    • http://greatdividept.com/coronavirus-update/ → 200 over http
    • http://greatdividept.com/covid-19-update-july-2020/ → 200 over http
    • http://greatdividept.com/new-faces-clinic/ → 200 over http
    • http://greatdividept.com/great-divide-pt-growing/ → 200 over http
  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://greatdividept.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://greatdividept.com/our-clinic/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://greatdividept.com/patient-testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://greatdividept.com/meet-our-staff/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://greatdividept.com/treatment-techniques/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://greatdividept.com/online-programs/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://greatdividept.com/resources/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://greatdividept.com/first-time-visit/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://greatdividept.com/insurance-payments/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://greatdividept.com/information-for-physicians/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://greatdividept.com/patient-forms/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://greatdividept.com/contact/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    2 of 179 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://greatdividept.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://greatdividept.com/our-clinic/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://greatdividept.com/patient-testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://greatdividept.com/meet-our-staff/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://greatdividept.com/treatment-techniques/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://greatdividept.com/online-programs/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://greatdividept.com/resources/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://greatdividept.com/first-time-visit/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://greatdividept.com/insurance-payments/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://greatdividept.com/information-for-physicians/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://greatdividept.com/patient-forms/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://greatdividept.com/contact/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://greatdividept.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://greatdividept.com/our-clinic/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://greatdividept.com/patient-testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://greatdividept.com/meet-our-staff/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://greatdividept.com/treatment-techniques/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://greatdividept.com/online-programs/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://greatdividept.com/resources/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://greatdividept.com/first-time-visit/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://greatdividept.com/insurance-payments/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://greatdividept.com/information-for-physicians/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://greatdividept.com/patient-forms/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://greatdividept.com/contact/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundMixed contentLow

    13 resources on HTTPS pages are loaded over plain HTTP.

    • https://greatdividept.com/ loads image http://greatdividept.com/wp-content/themes/foundationpress_2017-09-25_17-54/assets/images…
    • https://greatdividept.com/our-clinic/ loads image http://greatdividept.com/wp-content/themes/foundationpress_2017-09-25_17-54/assets/images…
    • https://greatdividept.com/our-clinic/ loads image http://greatdividept.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/owners-2.png
    • https://greatdividept.com/patient-testimonials/ loads image http://greatdividept.com/wp-content/themes/foundationpress_2017-09-25_17-54/assets/images…
    • https://greatdividept.com/meet-our-staff/ loads image http://greatdividept.com/wp-content/themes/foundationpress_2017-09-25_17-54/assets/images…
    • https://greatdividept.com/treatment-techniques/ loads image http://greatdividept.com/wp-content/themes/foundationpress_2017-09-25_17-54/assets/images…
    • https://greatdividept.com/online-programs/ loads image http://greatdividept.com/wp-content/themes/foundationpress_2017-09-25_17-54/assets/images…
    • https://greatdividept.com/resources/ loads image http://greatdividept.com/wp-content/themes/foundationpress_2017-09-25_17-54/assets/images…
    • https://greatdividept.com/first-time-visit/ loads image http://greatdividept.com/wp-content/themes/foundationpress_2017-09-25_17-54/assets/images…
    • https://greatdividept.com/insurance-payments/ loads image http://greatdividept.com/wp-content/themes/foundationpress_2017-09-25_17-54/assets/images…
    • https://greatdividept.com/information-for-physicians/ loads image http://greatdividept.com/wp-content/themes/foundationpress_2017-09-25_17-54/assets/images…
    • https://greatdividept.com/patient-forms/ loads image http://greatdividept.com/wp-content/themes/foundationpress_2017-09-25_17-54/assets/images…
  • FoundForms over HTTPSMedium

    12 forms would send what visitors type over plain HTTP, where it can be read or changed on the way.

    • http://greatdividept.com/blog/ has 2 forms on a page served over plain HTTP
    • http://greatdividept.com/use-heat-ice/ has 1 form on a page served over plain HTTP
    • http://greatdividept.com/posture/ has 1 form on a page served over plain HTTP
    • http://greatdividept.com/visceral-manipulation/ has 1 form on a page served over plain HTTP
    • http://greatdividept.com/nominated-missoulas-choice-best-physcial-therapist/ has 1 form on a page served over plain HTTP
    • http://greatdividept.com/coronavirus-update/ has 1 form on a page served over plain HTTP
    • http://greatdividept.com/covid-19-update-july-2020/ has 1 form on a page served over plain HTTP
    • http://greatdividept.com/new-faces-clinic/ has 1 form on a page served over plain HTTP
    • http://greatdividept.com/great-divide-pt-growing/ has 1 form on a page served over plain HTTP
    • http://greatdividept.com/staff/kate-skinner/staff-08/ has 1 form on a page served over plain HTTP
    • http://greatdividept.com/staff/kate-skinner/staff-07/ has 1 form on a page served over plain HTTP
    • http://greatdividept.com/staff/kate-skinner/staff-06/ has 1 form on a page served over plain HTTP
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    2 libraries with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 2.1.0, jQuery 2.2.5. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 2.1.0 in https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.0/jquery.min.js?ver=2.1.0: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
    • jQuery 2.2.5 in https://greatdividept.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jquer…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • ajax.googleapis.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
4 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 2 of 179 pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of greatdividept.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near greatdividept.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling greatdividept.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own greatdividept.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming greatdividept.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.