Scanned sites / eyesonbridgwater.com / 2026-09-14-0452

eyesonbridgwater.com scan from 2026-09-14 04:52:39 UTC DR 4

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-14-0452

Scanned 2026-09-14 04:52:39 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 05:11:57 UTC. Found on page 5 of brave web search results

Site: https://eyesonbridgwater.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

87/ 100Good

On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 43 pages and 491 assets of eyesonbridgwater.com, starting from https://eyesonbridgwater.com/. It scored 87 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (34), title tags (11), sitemap coverage (6); 11 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6.8), title tags (−2.8), sitemap coverage (−0.9). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Low1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
43
Assets fetched
491
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

534 of 534 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 68 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags11 issues
    11 of 39 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −2.8 points
  • Meta descriptions34 issues
    34 of 39 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −6.8 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 39 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −0.3 points
  • Broken links1 issue
    39 internal links point at 1 broken URL.
    −0.5 points
  • Links to other sites2 issues
    2 destinations answered with an error, 14 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 61 destinations checked.
    −0.8 points
  • Redirects2 issues
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses1 issue
    470 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 3 of them are pages, 1 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.3 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 39 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 181 image references have no alt attribute. 83 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 491 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage6 issues
    2 sitemaps listing 35 URLs: 5 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.9 points
  • Internal link counts1 noted
    Internal link counts for 40 pages; 1 worth a look.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 39 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −0.2 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 43 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 40 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives40 noted
    40 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure8 noted
    8 of 39 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 40 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 17 response headers recorded across 534 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 40 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 41 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2706 sites, median 80%, average 78%

eyesonbridgwater.com scores 87%, higher than 79% of the 2706 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0631260%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 10 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 7 sites57%: 16 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 40 sites67%: 40 sites68%: 39 sites69%: 50 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 78 sites72%: 74 sites73%: 82 sites74%: 77 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 96 sites77%: 107 sites78%: 123 sites79%: 109 sites80%: 124 sites81%: 120 sites82%: 123 sites83%: 118 sites84%: 126 sites85%: 102 sites86%: 91 sites87%: 91 sites88%: 77 sites89%: 72 sites90%: 53 sites91%: 56 sites92%: 40 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 23 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 15 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 76 sites87% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website has a great health score of 91/100, but there are critical issues to fix, including broken links, non-200 responses, and title/meta description problems. Addressing these will improve the user experience and SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 39 broken links can lead to poor user experience and negatively impact SEO.

    How: Update or remove the internal links pointing to the broken URL.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 470 non-200 responses may confuse search engines and users, harming SEO.

    How: Identify and fix or redirect the URLs returning non-200 statuses.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: 11 pages have title issues, affecting search visibility and click-through rates.

    How: Revise titles to ensure they are under 60 characters and relevant.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 20 pages with meta description issues can lower click-through rates from search results.

    How: Create unique, descriptive meta descriptions under 160 characters for affected pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Fix Heading Issues

    Why: 2 pages with multiple H1s can confuse search engines about content hierarchy.

    How: Use a single H1 tag per page and adjust other headings properly.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Enhance Sitemap Coverage

    Why: 5 crawled pages missing from sitemap can harm discoverability.

    How: Ensure all pages are listed in the sitemap and fix the broken sitemap URL.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site has security issues related to third-party scripts and sensitive paths listed in the robots.txt file. These could expose the site to script vulnerabilities and unauthorized access attempts. Implementing a Content Security Policy and restricting sensitive paths will enhance security.

  • 0 high
  • 0 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Third-party scripts without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains can be compromised, impacting the security of your site if they are not validated.

    Fix: Implement a Content Security Policy that specifies trusted domains and consider using Subresource Integrity for scripts.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  2. 2

    Sensitive path listed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The listing of /wp-admin/ allows potential attackers to know where sensitive content may be present, increasing the risk of probing attacks.

    Fix: Remove sensitive paths from robots.txt and enforce access control at the server level.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 5 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • cdn.jsdelivr.net (40 script tags)
    • data.staticfiles.io (40 script tags)
    • unpkg.com (39 script tags)
    • cdnjs.cloudflare.com (13 script tags)
    • embed.typeform.com (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
10 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 40 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 40 HTML pages.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 40 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 40 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near eyesonbridgwater.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling eyesonbridgwater.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own eyesonbridgwater.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming eyesonbridgwater.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.