Scanned sites / dircks.com / 2026-09-14-0900

dircks.com scan from 2026-09-14 09:00:02 UTC DR 24

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-14-0900

Scanned 2026-09-14 09:00:02 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 09:50:01 UTC. Found on page 2 of chatgpt for browser (api usage) results

Site: https://dircks.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

85/ 100Good

On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 394 pages and 967 assets of dircks.com, starting from https://dircks.com/. It scored 85 out of 100, a good result. 10 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (65), redirects (146), links to other sites (13); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), redirects (−2.4), links to other sites (−2.1). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
394
Assets fetched
967
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
10 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

1,361 of 1,361 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 134 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags29 issues
    29 of 214 pages have title issues. 34 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.2 points
  • Meta descriptions60 issues
    60 of 214 pages have meta description issues. 34 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.9 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 214 pages have heading issues. 34 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken links1 issue
    1 internal link point at 1 broken URL.
    −0.1 points
  • Links to other sites13 issues
    13 destinations answered with an error, 43 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 104 destinations checked.
    −2.1 points
  • Redirects146 issues
    146 redirecting URLs, 1 of them chained.
    −2.4 points
  • Non-200 responses1 issue
    148 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 146 of them are pages, 1 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability12 issues
    12 of 226 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 22 pages noindex by design.
    −0.5 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 2593 image references have no alt attribute. 130 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets65 issues
    65 assets larger than 500 KB among 967 fetched assets. 18 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages12 issues
    12 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.2 points
  • Sitemap coverage23 issues
    7 sitemaps listing 191 URLs: 23 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.6 points
  • Internal link counts34 noted
    Internal link counts for 248 pages; 34 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 214 pages have fewer than 200 words. 34 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format125 noted
    125 of 394 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals34 noted
    34 of 248 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives248 noted
    248 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text29 noted
    29 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure156 noted
    156 of 214 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 34 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length56 noted
    56 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 248 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 16 response headers recorded across 1361 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 248 pages; 27 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 57 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

dircks.com scores 85%, higher than 70% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites85% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website has some technical SEO issues, including broken links, redirect chains, and problems with title tags and meta descriptions. Addressing these will improve user experience and SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: One broken internal link can affect user experience and crawl efficiency.

    How: Update the link on https://dircks.com/business-moving/office-moves/ to point to a valid URL.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirect Chains

    Why: Chained redirects can slow down page loading times and impact SEO.

    How: Update the redirect from https://dircks.com/contact/claim-form/ to point directly to the final URL https://dircks.com/claims/.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: 148 URLs returning non-200 responses can hurt visibility and accessibility.

    How: Identify the non-200 URLs and change their statuses to 200 by correcting or removing them.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: 29 pages have title issues that can hurt click-through rates.

    How: Revise titles for affected pages, ensuring they are unique and relevant to the content.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Duplicate meta descriptions on 36 pages can reduce SEO effectiveness.

    How: Create unique meta descriptions for impacted pages, ensuring they concisely summarize each page's content.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Link to Orphan Pages

    Why: 12 orphan pages lack internal links, making them difficult to discover.

    How: Add internal links from relevant pages to these orphan pages to improve their visibility.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website lacks critical security measures, including a Content Security Policy, and uses outdated JavaScript libraries with known vulnerabilities. These issues could expose your site to attacks or data breaches. Immediate action is needed to enhance your security.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Without a Content Security Policy, the site is vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks.

    Fix: Implement a Content Security Policy header: `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';`.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Vulnerable jQuery VersionMedium

    Why it matters: jQuery 2.1.0 has multiple known vulnerabilities that could be exploited.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to at least version 3.5.0.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  3. 3

    Vulnerable Bootstrap VersionMedium

    Why it matters: Bootstrap 3.3.5 is outdated and has significant vulnerabilities that may be exploited.

    Fix: Upgrade Bootstrap to at least version 3.4.1.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  4. 4

    Third-Party Scripts Lack Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from other domains could be manipulated to execute malicious code on your site.

    Fix: Use Subresource Integrity for these scripts, or implement a strict Content Security Policy that lists trusted hosts.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 248 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://dircks.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dircks.com/home-moving/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dircks.com/home-moving/local-moving/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dircks.com/home-moving/cross-country/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dircks.com/home-moving/international-moves/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dircks.com/home-moving/packing-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dircks.com/home-moving/storage-and-warehousing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dircks.com/home-moving/personalized-moves/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dircks.com/home-moving/auto-transport/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dircks.com/home-moving/faq/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dircks.com/home-moving/move-concierge-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://dircks.com/areas-served/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    2 libraries with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 2.1.0, Bootstrap 3.3.5. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 2.1.0 in https://dircks.com/wp-content/themes/g5plus-moveco/assets/js/plugin.js?ver=7.0.4: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
    • Bootstrap 3.3.5 in https://dircks.com/wp-content/themes/g5plus-moveco/assets/plugins/bootstrap/js/…: CVE-2016-10735, CVE-2018-14040, CVE-2018-14041, CVE-2018-14042, CVE-2019-8331 (XSS through data attributes in tooltip, popover, collapse and scrollspy); fixed in 3.4.1
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • link.msgsndr.com (27 script tags)
    • conciergeapi.moveeasy.com (1 script tag)
    • recruitingbypaycor.com (1 script tag)
10 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 248 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 248 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 248 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 248 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    40 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near dircks.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling dircks.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own dircks.com?