Scanned sites / burtonshair.com / 2026-09-11-1901

burtonshair.com scan from 2026-09-11 19:01:40 UTC DR 4

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-11-1901

Scanned 2026-09-11 19:01:40 UTC, finished 2026-09-11 19:17:33 UTC

Site: https://burtonshair.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

73/ 100Needs work

On September 11, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 38 pages and 446 assets of burtonshair.com, starting from https://burtonshair.com/. It scored 73 out of 100, a result that needs work. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (34), meta descriptions (10), title tags (8); 10 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), title tags (−4), meta descriptions (−4). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
38
Assets fetched
446
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

484 of 484 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 27 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags8 issues
    8 of 19 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −4 points
  • Meta descriptions10 issues
    10 of 19 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −4 points
  • Headings12 issues
    12 of 19 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −3.6 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites80 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 4 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 27 destinations checked.
  • Redirects17 issues
    18 redirecting URLs, 6 of them chained.
    −3.4 points
  • Non-200 responses1 issue
    33 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 18 of them are pages, 1 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.5 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 19 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 591 image references have no alt attribute. 37 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets34 issues
    34 assets larger than 500 KB among 446 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages10 issues
    10 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −2 points
  • Sitemap coverage12 issues
    3 sitemaps listing 19 URLs: 1 crawled page missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 10 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −3.6 points
  • Internal link counts1 noted
    Internal link counts for 20 pages; 1 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 19 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 38 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 20 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives20 noted
    20 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text11 noted
    11 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structureOK
    0 of 19 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length34 noted
    33 images over 100 KB; 1 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies2 noted
    2 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 20 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 484 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 20 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 55 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2347 sites, median 79%, average 78%

burtonshair.com scores 73%, higher than 26% of the 2347 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 36 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 91 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 106 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 101 sites84%: 109 sites85%: 87 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 66 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 17 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites73% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lacks HTTP Strict Transport Security, making it vulnerable to interception on initial requests. Additionally, it loads third-party scripts without Subresource Integrity, which poses a potential risk if those sources are compromised.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users who type the site address without HTTPS may be exposed to man-in-the-middle attacks.

    Fix: Add the following header to all HTML responses: `Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains`.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from third-party domains can change behavior if those sources are compromised, risking security.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity for scripts or use a Content-Security-Policy that specifies allowed domains.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://burtonshair.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://burtonshair.com/team/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://burtonshair.com/services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://burtonshair.com/bridal/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://burtonshair.com/gallery/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://burtonshair.com/gallery/hair-gallery/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://burtonshair.com/gallery/hair-extensions/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://burtonshair.com/elementor-3231/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://burtonshair.com/team/angel-herring/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://burtonshair.com/stephanie-hansen/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://burtonshair.com/lisa-tutty/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://burtonshair.com/angel-herring/ → no strict-transport-security
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • cdn.trustindex.io (1 script tag)
11 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 20 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 20 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 20 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    21 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near burtonshair.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling burtonshair.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own burtonshair.com?