Scanned sites / studio26.ca

SEO report for studio26.ca DR 8

The latest Site Spider scan of studio26.ca, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/studio26-ca/2026-09-10-1356.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-10 13:56:17 UTC, finished 2026-09-10 18:02:49 UTC

Site: https://studio26.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

73/ 100Needs work

On September 10, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 26 pages and 363 assets of studio26.ca, starting from https://studio26.ca/. It scored 73 out of 100, a result that needs work. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (14), meta descriptions (16), headings (12); 10 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−7), meta descriptions (−6.4), headings (−3.6). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: High1 high, 4 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
26
Assets fetched
363
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

389 of 389 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 16 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags14 issues
    14 of 16 pages have title issues. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −7 points
  • Meta descriptions16 issues
    16 of 16 pages have meta description issues. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.4 points
  • Headings12 issues
    12 of 16 pages have heading issues. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.6 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites45 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 10 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 16 destinations checked.
  • Redirects6 issues
    7 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −1.2 points
  • Non-200 responses10 noted
    10 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 6 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 20 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 89 image references have no alt attribute. 82 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets5 issues
    5 assets larger than 500 KB among 363 fetched assets.
    −3 points
  • Orphan pages10 issues
    10 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −2 points
  • Sitemap coverage6 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 16 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 6 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.8 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 20 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content6 issues
    6 of 16 pages have fewer than 200 words. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.4 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 26 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • Canonicals4 noted
    4 of 20 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives20 noted
    20 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure9 noted
    9 of 16 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length13 noted
    13 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies5 noted
    5 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 20 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 389 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 20 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 76 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2316 sites, median 79%, average 78%

studio26.ca scores 73%, higher than 26% of the 2316 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 105 sites81%: 104 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 61 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 46 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites73% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The website needs improvements in areas like redirects, status codes, titles, meta descriptions, headings, and orphaned pages. Addressing these will enhance user experience and SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: These URLs are not accessible; fixing them improves site health.

    How: Update the URLs to return a 2xx response or fix redirects as needed.

    Checks: status-codes

  2. 2

    Consolidate Redirects

    Why: Redirects can slow down user access and dilute SEO strength.

    How: Replace the original URLs with the final destination URLs to avoid unnecessary redirects.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Revise Title Tags

    Why: Short and missing title tags hurt search visibility and click-through rates.

    How: Update all relevant title tags to be unique and between 30-60 characters long.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Implement Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions are missing or insufficient, affecting click-through rates.

    How: Add compelling meta descriptions to all pages, aiming for 50-160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Address Heading Issues

    Why: Multiple H1s and missing H1s confuse search engines and users.

    How: Ensure each page has one H1 and appropriate H2s for structure.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Link to Orphan Pages

    Why: Orphan pages have no internal links, making them hard to discover.

    How: Add internal links to orphan pages from relevant content throughout the site.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

This website has important security flaws, including lack of HTTPS on some pages, which can expose information during transit. Security headers like HSTS, Content Security Policy, and X-Frame-Options are missing, increasing the risk of various attacks. It is crucial to implement these measures promptly.

  • 1 high
  • 4 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    HTTP Pages DetectedHigh

    Why it matters: 4 pages served over plain HTTP can be intercepted, allowing data exposure.

    Fix: Redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS.

    Evidence: HTTPS

  2. 2

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, first-time visitors can be intercepted if they mistype the URL.

    Fix: Add the header: `Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload`.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  3. 3

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: No CSP means unrestricted loading of resources, increasing XSS risks.

    Fix: Implement a CSP header, e.g., `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';`.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  4. 4

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of this header makes the site vulnerable to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: `X-Frame-Options: DENY`.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  5. 5

    Vulnerable jQuery VersionMedium

    Why it matters: jQuery 1.9.1 has known vulnerabilities that may be exploited depending on usage.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  6. 6

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, a browser might execute files as scripts based on content.

    Fix: Add the header: `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff`.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  7. 7

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains can be tampered with, affecting site security.

    Fix: Implement SRI for third-party scripts or use CSP to limit them.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTPSHigh

    4 pages answered 200 over plain HTTP with no redirect to HTTPS, while 16 were served over HTTPS. Anyone on the network path can read or alter these pages.

    • http://studio26.ca/class-schedule/ → 200 over http
    • http://studio26.ca/pricing/ → 200 over http
    • http://studio26.ca/the-studio/ → 200 over http
    • http://studio26.ca/massage-therapy/ → 200 over http
  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://studio26.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studio26.ca/the-studio/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studio26.ca/new-students-faqs/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studio26.ca/pricing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studio26.ca/class-descriptions/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studio26.ca/class-schedule/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studio26.ca/anna-hovland/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studio26.ca/romy-rajan/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studio26.ca/contact-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studio26.ca/2026/04/13/teacher1/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studio26.ca/yoga-teacher-training-joseph-encinia/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://studio26.ca/original-hot-yoga-teacher-training-ida-ripley/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 20 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://studio26.ca/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studio26.ca/the-studio/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studio26.ca/new-students-faqs/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studio26.ca/pricing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studio26.ca/class-descriptions/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studio26.ca/class-schedule/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studio26.ca/anna-hovland/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studio26.ca/romy-rajan/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://studio26.ca/contact-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • http://studio26.ca/class-schedule/ → no content-security-policy
    • http://studio26.ca/pricing/ → no content-security-policy
    • http://studio26.ca/the-studio/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://studio26.ca/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studio26.ca/the-studio/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studio26.ca/new-students-faqs/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studio26.ca/pricing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studio26.ca/class-descriptions/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studio26.ca/class-schedule/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studio26.ca/anna-hovland/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studio26.ca/romy-rajan/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://studio26.ca/contact-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • http://studio26.ca/class-schedule/ → no x-frame-options
    • http://studio26.ca/pricing/ → no x-frame-options
    • http://studio26.ca/the-studio/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://studio26.ca/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studio26.ca/the-studio/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studio26.ca/new-students-faqs/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studio26.ca/pricing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studio26.ca/class-descriptions/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studio26.ca/class-schedule/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studio26.ca/anna-hovland/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studio26.ca/romy-rajan/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://studio26.ca/contact-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • http://studio26.ca/class-schedule/ → no x-content-type-options
    • http://studio26.ca/pricing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • http://studio26.ca/the-studio/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.9.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.9.1 in https://studio26.ca/wp-content/plugins/elementskit-lite/widgets/init/assets/js/…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • widgets.mindbodyonline.com (2 script tags)
5 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of studio26.ca

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near studio26.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling studio26.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own studio26.ca?