Scanned sites / backinline.ca / 2026-09-12-2016

backinline.ca scan from 2026-09-12 20:16:57 UTC DR 3

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-12-2016

Scanned 2026-09-12 20:16:57 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 20:57:49 UTC. Found on page 5 of brave web search results

Site: https://backinline.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

89/ 100Good

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 37 pages and 195 assets of backinline.ca, starting from https://backinline.ca/. It scored 89 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (10), broken links (2), redirects (5); 10 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), broken links (−1.5), redirects (−0.7). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: High1 high, 4 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
37
Assets fetched
195
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

232 of 232 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 12 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags1 issue
    1 of 24 pages have title issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.4 points
  • Meta descriptions1 issue
    1 of 24 pages have meta description issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.3 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 24 pages have heading issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken links2 issues
    2 internal links point at 2 broken URLs.
    −1.5 points
  • Links to other sites1 issue
    1 destination answered with an error, 4 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 10 destinations checked.
    −0.4 points
  • Redirects5 issues
    9 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.7 points
  • Non-200 responses2 issues
    11 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 10 of them are pages, 2 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.7 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 25 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 2 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 55 image references have no alt attribute. 11 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets10 issues
    10 assets larger than 500 KB among 195 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage3 issues
    3 sitemaps listing 27 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 3 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.7 points
  • Internal link counts2 noted
    Internal link counts for 27 pages; 2 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 24 pages have fewer than 200 words. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content2 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.6 points
  • URL format3 noted
    3 of 37 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals3 noted
    3 of 27 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives27 noted
    27 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text6 noted
    6 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure2 noted
    2 of 24 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length8 noted
    7 images over 100 KB; 1 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 27 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 232 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 27 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 68 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2511 sites, median 80%, average 78%

backinline.ca scores 89%, higher than 85% of the 2511 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0601190%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 8 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 37 sites67%: 36 sites68%: 38 sites69%: 49 sites70%: 48 sites71%: 73 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 74 sites74%: 73 sites75%: 77 sites76%: 89 sites77%: 99 sites78%: 114 sites79%: 100 sites80%: 119 sites81%: 111 sites82%: 113 sites83%: 113 sites84%: 118 sites85%: 94 sites86%: 78 sites87%: 85 sites88%: 61 sites89%: 70 sites90%: 46 sites91%: 54 sites92%: 40 sites93%: 27 sites94%: 21 sites95%: 13 sites96%: 14 sites97%: 14 sites98%: 6 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites89% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website has several issues affecting SEO, including broken links, redirects, non-200 responses, title and meta description problems, heavy assets, and duplicate content. Prioritize fixing these for improved performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links negatively affect user experience and SEO.

    How: Update or remove broken links on the contact page to ensure they point to existing URLs.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirects

    Why: Redirects can slow down page loading and confuse search engines.

    How: Consider updating internal links to point directly to the final URLs instead of redirecting.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Correct Non-200 Responses

    Why: Non-200 responses lead to poor user experience and can harm SEO.

    How: Ensure all URLs return a 200 status, particularly those causing redirects.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Long title tags can reduce visibility in search results.

    How: Shorten your main title tag on the homepage to be under 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Issues with meta descriptions can reduce click-through rates from search engines.

    How: Shorten and refine the meta description on the privacy policy to make it compelling and concise.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Reduce Asset Size

    Why: Heavy assets slow down your website's loading speed.

    How: Compress or simplify large stylesheets and images to improve page speed.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website backinline.ca has several security weaknesses, including the support of HTTP for one page, lack of crucial security headers, and a form transmitting data over HTTP. Addressing these issues will significantly improve the site's security against data interception and attacks.

  • 1 high
  • 4 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    HTTP Page DetectedHigh

    Why it matters: One page served over HTTP can be intercepted, allowing data reading or alteration.

    Fix: Redirect all HTTP requests to HTTPS to secure all pages.

    Evidence: HTTPS

  2. 2

    Missing HSTS HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: No HSTS header prevents secure connections from defaulting to HTTP, exposing the initial request to interception.

    Fix: Add an HTTP header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  3. 3

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows unrestricted loading of scripts and resources, increasing risk of XSS and malicious injection.

    Fix: Include a CSP header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  4. 4

    Absence of Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Not specifying X-Frame-Options makes the site vulnerable to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Implement an HTTP header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  5. 5

    Form Data Sent Over HTTPMedium

    Why it matters: One form on a non-HTTPS page exposes user input to potential interception.

    Fix: Ensure all forms are submitted over HTTPS by serving the page securely.

    Evidence: Forms over HTTPS

  6. 6

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: No X-Content-Type-Options header allows browsers to execute files based on content rather than declared type.

    Fix: Add header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTPSHigh

    1 page answered 200 over plain HTTP with no redirect to HTTPS, while 26 were served over HTTPS. Anyone on the network path can read or alter these pages.

    • http://backinline.ca/privacy-policy/ → 200 over http
  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://backinline.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://backinline.ca/what-is-chiropractic/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://backinline.ca/conditions-treated/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://backinline.ca/shockwave-therapy/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://backinline.ca/custom-orthotics/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://backinline.ca/massage/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://backinline.ca/acupuncture-and-dry-needling/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://backinline.ca/recovery/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://backinline.ca/who-we-help/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://backinline.ca/edmonton-team/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://backinline.ca/dr-troy-samchuk/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://backinline.ca/dr-robert-kochmarski/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 27 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://backinline.ca/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://backinline.ca/what-is-chiropractic/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://backinline.ca/conditions-treated/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://backinline.ca/shockwave-therapy/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://backinline.ca/custom-orthotics/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://backinline.ca/massage/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://backinline.ca/acupuncture-and-dry-needling/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://backinline.ca/recovery/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://backinline.ca/who-we-help/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://backinline.ca/edmonton-team/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://backinline.ca/dr-troy-samchuk/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://backinline.ca/dr-robert-kochmarski/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://backinline.ca/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://backinline.ca/what-is-chiropractic/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://backinline.ca/conditions-treated/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://backinline.ca/shockwave-therapy/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://backinline.ca/custom-orthotics/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://backinline.ca/massage/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://backinline.ca/acupuncture-and-dry-needling/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://backinline.ca/recovery/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://backinline.ca/who-we-help/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://backinline.ca/edmonton-team/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://backinline.ca/dr-troy-samchuk/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://backinline.ca/dr-robert-kochmarski/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://backinline.ca/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://backinline.ca/what-is-chiropractic/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://backinline.ca/conditions-treated/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://backinline.ca/shockwave-therapy/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://backinline.ca/custom-orthotics/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://backinline.ca/massage/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://backinline.ca/acupuncture-and-dry-needling/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://backinline.ca/recovery/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://backinline.ca/who-we-help/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://backinline.ca/edmonton-team/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://backinline.ca/dr-troy-samchuk/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://backinline.ca/dr-robert-kochmarski/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundForms over HTTPSMedium

    1 form would send what visitors type over plain HTTP, where it can be read or changed on the way.

    • http://backinline.ca/privacy-policy/ has 2 forms on a page served over plain HTTP
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKThird-party scripts

    The sampled pages load no scripts from other domains.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near backinline.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling backinline.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own backinline.ca?