Scanned sites / arvow.com / 2026-11-02-1539

arvow.com scan from 2026-11-02 15:39:59 UTC DR 58

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-11-02-1539

Scanned 2026-11-02 15:39:59 UTC, finished 2026-11-02 16:48:24 UTC. Found with 42backlinks.com tool directory

Site: https://arvow.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

77/ 100Good

On November 2, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 760 pages and 999 assets of arvow.com, starting from https://arvow.com/. It scored 77 out of 100, a good result. 13 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (577), heavy assets (45), title tags (426); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6.1), heavy assets (−6), title tags (−5.6). 13 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 3 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
760
Assets fetched
999
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
13 of 33
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

1,759 of 1,760 discovered URLs were fetched, 4,458 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 1577 left unchecked.

  • Title tags426 issues
    426 of 734 pages have title issues. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.6 points
  • Meta descriptions577 issues
    577 of 734 pages have meta description issues. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.1 points
  • Headings84 issues
    84 of 734 pages have heading issues. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.7 points
  • Broken links2 issues
    2 internal links point at 2 broken URLs.
    −0.1 points
  • Links to other sites27 issues
    27 destinations answered with an error, 63 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 1577 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −1.4 points
  • Redirects2 issues
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses2 issues
    5 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 4 of them are pages, 2 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability24 issues
    24 of 737 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 19 pages noindex by design. 19 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −0.3 points
  • Image alt text147 issues
    147 of 10999 image references have no alt attribute. 1909 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.1 points
  • Heavy assets45 issues
    45 assets larger than 500 KB among 999 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages102 issues
    102 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.5 points
  • Sitemap coverage218 issues
    1 sitemap listing 636 URLs: 115 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 84 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.7 points
  • Internal link counts75 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 75 worth a look.
  • Thin content17 issues
    17 of 734 pages have fewer than 200 words. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.2 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format9 noted
    9 of 760 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals24 noted
    24 of 756 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives19 noted
    19 pages carry a robots directive; 737 carry none.
  • Anchor text3 noted
    3 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure272 noted
    272 of 734 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length1,023 noted
    172 images over 100 KB; 851 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validation441 noted
    441 of 756 pages have HTML problems: 49 with head tags outside <head>, 0 over 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured data6 noted
    47 of 734 indexable pages carry structured data: FAQPage (47), Question (47), Answer (47), Article (41), Organization (41). 6 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicates17 noted
    17 pages in 8 groups read almost the same as another page (95% alike or more).
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 756 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions6 noted
    6 of 649 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • Pagination1 noted
    51 pages in pagination sequences; 1 with problems.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    1 cookie set by the site; 9 response headers recorded across 1759 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 756 pages; 701 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling495 noted
    495 words an English dictionary does not know, on 627 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2620 sites, median 80%, average 78%

arvow.com scores 77%, higher than 37% of the 2620 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0601200%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 5 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 5 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 8 sites54%: 10 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 7 sites57%: 15 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 39 sites67%: 39 sites68%: 37 sites69%: 48 sites70%: 48 sites71%: 74 sites72%: 73 sites73%: 78 sites74%: 76 sites75%: 84 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 106 sites78%: 118 sites79%: 106 sites80%: 120 sites81%: 115 sites82%: 119 sites83%: 117 sites84%: 120 sites85%: 98 sites86%: 87 sites87%: 86 sites88%: 70 sites89%: 72 sites90%: 48 sites91%: 56 sites92%: 41 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 21 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 16 sites97%: 15 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites77% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Several issues were identified, including broken links, non-200 responses, title and meta description problems, along with heavy assets. Address these for improved SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken internal links hinder user experience and crawl efficiency.

    How: Update or remove links pointing to https://arvow.com/[email protected] and https://arvow.com/terms.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Correct Non-200 Responses

    Why: Non-200 responses negatively impact user access and SEO ranking.

    How: Remove or correct the pages returning 404 or 301 errors for https://arvow.com/[email protected] and https://arvow.com/terms.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Revise Title Tags

    Why: Only 308 pages have valid title tags, negatively affecting SEO rankings.

    How: Create unique, descriptive title tags for the 426 pages with issues, ensuring they are 50-60 characters long.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Only 157 pages have valid meta descriptions, affecting search visibility.

    How: Write unique meta descriptions for 577 pages missing one, keeping them under 160 characters.

    Evidence: 207 pages have no meta description at all.

    207 pages affected

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Large asset sizes slow down load times, impacting user experience and SEO.

    How: Compress or replace heavy assets over 500 KB, prioritizing top file sizes identified in findings.

    Evidence: 1.1 MB of image, loaded by 6 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    6 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

  6. 6

    Address Indexability Issues

    Why: Some noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, causing confusion for search engines.

    How: Remove 19 noindex pages from the sitemap to clarify indexable content.

    Checks: indexability

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The security review of arvow.com highlights missing security headers, including HTTP Strict Transport Security and Content Security Policy. These vulnerabilities can expose the site to risks like interception and script injection. Implementing the recommended security measures is crucial to protect user data and prevent potential attacks.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 3 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors can be intercepted on initial requests without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains' to your server configuration.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows unrestricted script and resource loading, increasing XSS risk.

    Fix: Implement 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';' in your HTTP headers.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: No clickjacking protection allows embedding in frames, potentially leading to phishing.

    Fix: Add 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' to your HTTP headers.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers can misinterpret file types, leading to security issues.

    Fix: Add 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' to your HTTP headers.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Missing Referrer-Policy HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Absence of a referrer-policy exposes full URLs when users navigate away from your site.

    Fix: Add 'Referrer-Policy: no-referrer' to your HTTP headers.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  6. 6

    Third-party Scripts Without SRILow

    Why it matters: Using external scripts without Subresource Integrity can introduce security risks if those scripts are compromised.

    Fix: Implement a CSP that includes only trusted domains or examine third-party scripts for SRI support.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  7. 7

    Missing Permissions-Policy HeaderInfo

    Why it matters: Lack of permissions policy allows potential misuse of browser features on your site.

    Fix: Add 'Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(self)' to limit feature access.

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://arvow.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/autoblog → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 756 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://arvow.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/autoblog → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://arvow.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/autoblog → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://arvow.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/autoblog → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://arvow.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/autoblog → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://arvow.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/autoblog → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no permissions-policy
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 4 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • code.iconify.design (40 script tags)
    • fast.wistia.com (26 script tags)
    • server.fillout.com (1 script tag)
    • fast.wistia.net (1 script tag)
9 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 756 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKCookie flags

    All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    45 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near arvow.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling arvow.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own arvow.com?