Scanned sites / arvow.com / 2026-10-21-1445

arvow.com scan from 2026-10-21 14:45:54 UTC DR 58

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-10-21-1445

Scanned 2026-10-21 14:45:54 UTC, finished 2026-10-21 14:56:01 UTC. Found with 42backlinks.com tool directory

Site: https://arvow.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

76/ 100Good

On October 21, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 760 pages and 999 assets of arvow.com, starting from https://arvow.com/. It scored 76 out of 100, a good result. 13 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (556), heavy assets (45), title tags (419); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6), heavy assets (−6), title tags (−5.7). 13 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 3 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
760
Assets fetched
999
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
13 of 33
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

1,759 of 1,760 discovered URLs were fetched, 4,378 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 1578 left unchecked.

  • Title tags419 issues
    419 of 714 pages have title issues. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.7 points
  • Meta descriptions556 issues
    556 of 714 pages have meta description issues. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6 points
  • Headings83 issues
    83 of 714 pages have heading issues. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.7 points
  • Broken links22 issues
    24 internal links point at 22 broken URLs.
    −0.6 points
  • Links to other sites25 issues
    25 destinations answered with an error, 60 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 1578 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −1.4 points
  • Redirects2 issues
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses22 issues
    25 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 24 of them are pages, 22 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.3 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability24 issues
    24 of 717 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 19 pages noindex by design. 19 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −0.3 points
  • Image alt text147 issues
    147 of 10623 image references have no alt attribute. 1889 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.1 points
  • Heavy assets45 issues
    45 assets larger than 500 KB among 999 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages103 issues
    103 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.6 points
  • Sitemap coverage218 issues
    1 sitemap listing 617 URLs: 114 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 85 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.8 points
  • Internal link counts74 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 74 worth a look.
  • Thin content17 issues
    17 of 714 pages have fewer than 200 words. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.2 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format10 noted
    10 of 760 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals24 noted
    24 of 736 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives19 noted
    19 pages carry a robots directive; 717 carry none.
  • Anchor text3 noted
    3 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure244 noted
    244 of 714 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length827 noted
    172 images over 100 KB; 655 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validation441 noted
    441 of 736 pages have HTML problems: 49 with head tags outside <head>, 0 over 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured data6 noted
    47 of 714 indexable pages carry structured data: FAQPage (47), Question (47), Answer (47), Article (41), Organization (41). 6 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicates17 noted
    17 pages in 8 groups read almost the same as another page (95% alike or more).
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 736 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions7 noted
    7 of 628 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • Pagination1 noted
    50 pages in pagination sequences; 1 with problems.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    1 cookie set by the site; 9 response headers recorded across 1759 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 736 pages; 680 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling467 noted
    467 words an English dictionary does not know, on 609 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2303 sites, median 79%, average 78%

arvow.com scores 76%, higher than 35% of the 2303 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581160%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 4 sites52%: 11 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 16 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 34 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 43 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 67 sites74%: 69 sites75%: 71 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 91 sites78%: 105 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 106 sites82%: 116 sites83%: 96 sites84%: 110 sites85%: 84 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 71 sites88%: 61 sites89%: 60 sites90%: 33 sites91%: 45 sites92%: 36 sites93%: 20 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 11 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites76% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your website has several technical issues needing attention, primarily broken links and meta description problems. Focus on fixing these issues to enhance user experience and SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links harm user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify and update or remove the 24 broken links found during the crawl.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Address Meta Description Issues

    Why: Over half of your pages have issues with meta descriptions, impacting SEO.

    How: Write and optimize meta descriptions for the affected 556 pages.

    Evidence: 208 pages have no meta description at all.

    208 pages affected

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  3. 3

    Eliminate Non-200 Responses

    Why: 25 URLs return non-200 responses, which can dilute SEO value.

    How: Review and correct or redirect these URLs.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: 419 pages have title issues affecting search visibility.

    How: Revise title tags for clarity and uniqueness across affected pages.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Fix Headings Issues

    Why: 83 pages lack appropriate headings, hurting readability and SEO.

    How: Add proper H1 tags to the impacted pages.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Reduce Image Sizes

    Why: Large images can slow down your site performance.

    How: Optimize the specified heavy assets to improve loading speed.

    Evidence: 628 KB of image, loaded by 7 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    7 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site arvow.com lacks several important security headers, which could expose users to risks such as data interception and clickjacking. Key areas to address include enabling HTTP Strict Transport Security, implementing a Content Security Policy, and adding clickjacking protection. This will enhance overall site security and user safety.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 3 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors using HTTP can be intercepted on their first request.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows unrestricted loading of scripts and styles, increasing the risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add a header like: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' https://code.iconify.design https://fast.wistia.com https://server.fillout.com https://fast.wistia.net.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of this header allows clickjacking attacks, embedding the site in malicious frames.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers can misinterpret file types, potentially executing scripts erroneously.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Missing Referrer-Policy HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Absence of a referrer policy can disclose users' full page addresses when navigating.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  6. 6

    Third-Party Scripts Lack Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Using third-party scripts without Subresource Integrity can lead to security risks if these scripts are compromised.

    Fix: Consider implementing a Content-Security-Policy that specifies valid hosts for third-party scripts.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  7. 7

    Missing Permissions-Policy HeaderInfo

    Why it matters: Not having a permissions policy can expose browser features to untrusted scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: geo=(), microphone=(), camera=().

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://arvow.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/autoblog → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no strict-transport-security
    • https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 736 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://arvow.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/autoblog → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no content-security-policy
    • https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://arvow.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/autoblog → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no x-frame-options
    • https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://arvow.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/autoblog → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no x-content-type-options
    • https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://arvow.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/autoblog → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no referrer-policy
    • https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://arvow.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/autoblog → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no permissions-policy
    • https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no permissions-policy
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 4 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • code.iconify.design (40 script tags)
    • fast.wistia.com (26 script tags)
    • server.fillout.com (1 script tag)
    • fast.wistia.net (1 script tag)
9 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 736 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKCookie flags

    All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    45 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near arvow.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling arvow.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own arvow.com?