Scanned sites / arvow.com / 2026-10-18-1432
arvow.com scan from 10/18/2026, 2:32:54 PM DR 58
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
Scan 2026-10-18-1432
Scanned 10/18/2026, 2:32:54 PM, finished 10/18/2026, 2:42:03 PM. Found with 42backlinks.com tool directory
Site: https://arvow.com/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On October 18, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 757 pages and 999 assets of arvow.com, starting from https://arvow.com/. It scored 76 out of 100, a good result. 13 of 30 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (550), heavy assets (45), title tags (416); 5 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6), heavy assets (−6), title tags (−5.7). 12 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 1 check was not run because the crawl fetched nothing for it. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium3 medium, 3 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 757
- Assets fetched
- 999
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 13 of 30
1,756 of 1,757 discovered URLs were fetched, 4,385 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 1578 left unchecked.
- Title tags416 issues416 of 711 pages have title issues. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−5.7 points
- Meta descriptions550 issues550 of 711 pages have meta description issues. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−6 points
- Headings82 issues82 of 711 pages have heading issues. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−0.7 points
- Broken links22 issues24 internal links point at 22 broken URLs.−0.6 points
- Links to other sites23 issues23 destinations answered with an error, 62 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 1578 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.−1.3 points
- Redirects2 issues2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
- Non-200 responses22 issues25 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 24 of them are pages, 22 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.−0.3 points
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- Indexability24 issues24 of 714 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 19 pages noindex by design. 19 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.−0.3 points
- Image alt text147 issues147 of 10599 image references have no alt attribute. 1886 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.−0.1 points
- Heavy assets45 issues45 assets larger than 500 KB among 999 fetched assets.−6 points
- Orphan pages103 issues103 pages have no internal links pointing at them.−0.6 points
- Sitemap coverage216 issues1 sitemap listing 616 URLs: 112 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 85 reachable only via the sitemap.−1.8 points
- Internal link counts73 notedInternal link counts for 500 pages; 73 worth a look.
- Thin content17 issues17 of 711 pages have fewer than 200 words. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−0.2 points
- Duplicate contentOK0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
- URL format10 noted10 of 757 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
- Canonicals24 noted24 of 733 pages have a canonical worth checking.
- Robots directives19 noted19 pages carry a robots directive; 714 carry none.
- Anchor text3 noted3 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
- Title and heading structure241 noted241 of 711 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 22 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Image weight and alt length817 noted170 images over 100 KB; 647 with alt text over 100 characters.
- Response anomaliesOKNo redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
- HTML and head validation440 noted440 of 733 pages have HTML problems: 49 with head tags outside <head>, 0 over 2 MB.
- hreflangOKNo page declares hreflang.
- Structured data6 noted47 of 711 indexable pages carry structured data: FAQPage (47), Question (47), Answer (47), Article (41), Organization (41). 6 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
- Near duplicates15 noted15 pages in 7 groups read almost the same as another page (95% alike or more).
- Soft 404sOKNone of 733 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
- JavaScript renderingNot checkedNot checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
- PageSpeed Insights5 notedMobile performance 41 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
- Spelling467 noted467 words an English dictionary does not know, on 608 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.
Where this scan sits among all scanned sites
2284 sites, median 79%, average 78%
arvow.com scores 76%, higher than 35% of the 2284 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsThe site has multiple broken links, meta description issues, and missing title tags. Focus on fixing the broken links and improving meta descriptions for better SEO impact.
- 1
Fix Broken Links
Why: Avoids user frustration and improves site authority.
How: Update or remove links pointing to non-existent pages.
Checks: broken-links
- 2
Improve Meta Descriptions
Why: Enhances click-through rates by providing better relevance.
How: Write unique meta descriptions for the 550 pages with issues.
Evidence: 207 pages have no meta description at all.
207 pages affected
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 3
Resolve Non-200 Responses
Why: Ensures crawlability and good user experience.
How: Fix or update the status of 25 URLs not returning a 200 response.
Checks: status-codes
- 4
Add Missing Title Tags
Why: Improves SEO and page relevance.
How: Create relevant title tags for the 416 pages with issues.
Checks: titles
- 5
Address Heading Issues
Why: Supports better content structure and readability.
How: Add appropriate H1 headings to the 82 pages missing them.
Checks: headings
- 6
Fix Indexability Warnings
Why: Ensures all indexable pages are properly indexed.
How: Remove 'noindex' from pages listed in the sitemap and ensure proper handling.
Checks: indexability
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlThe site lacks several important security headers, making it vulnerable to various attacks. This includes missing HSTS for secure connections, CSP to control content loading, and X-Frame-Options for clickjacking protection. Implementing these changes is crucial to enhance the site's security.
- 0 high
- 3 medium
- 3 low
- 1 info
- 1
Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium
Why it matters: Without HSTS, initial requests can be intercepted if users type the site address without HTTPS.
Fix: Add the following header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains
Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security
- 2
Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium
Why it matters: No CSP means the browser can load scripts and styles from any source, increasing the risk of XSS attacks.
Fix: Add a Content-Security-Policy header tailored to your scripts and styles, e.g., Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' https://trusted.com;
Evidence: Content Security Policy
- 3
Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium
Why it matters: The absence of this header allows clickjacking attacks by embedding the page in a malicious iframe.
Fix: Add the following header: X-Frame-Options: DENY
Evidence: Clickjacking protection
- 4
Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow
Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may execute files as scripts, posing a security risk.
Fix: Add the following header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
Evidence: MIME sniffing protection
- 5
Missing Referrer PolicyLow
Why it matters: Lack of a referrer policy exposes users' full page addresses to third-party sites.
Fix: Add the following header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer-when-downgrade
Evidence: Referrer policy
- 6
Third-party scripts without Subresource Integrity (SRI)Low
Why it matters: Using scripts from external domains without SRI makes the site vulnerable to changes if those domains are compromised.
Fix: Consider implementing a Content-Security-Policy that specifies trusted domains, or use SRI for known third-party scripts.
Evidence: Third-party scripts
- 7
Missing Permissions-PolicyInfo
Why it matters: Without this header, browser features can be accessed anonymously by scripts.
Fix: Add the following header: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(), camera=(), microphone=()
Evidence: Permissions policy
What the checks found
- FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium
No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.
- https://arvow.com/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no strict-transport-security
- https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no strict-transport-security
- https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no strict-transport-security
- https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no strict-transport-security
- https://arvow.com/autoblog → no strict-transport-security
- https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no strict-transport-security
- https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no strict-transport-security
- https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no strict-transport-security
- https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no strict-transport-security
- https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no strict-transport-security
- https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no strict-transport-security
- FoundContent Security PolicyMedium
None of the 733 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.
- https://arvow.com/ → no content-security-policy
- https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no content-security-policy
- https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no content-security-policy
- https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no content-security-policy
- https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no content-security-policy
- https://arvow.com/autoblog → no content-security-policy
- https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no content-security-policy
- https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no content-security-policy
- https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no content-security-policy
- https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no content-security-policy
- https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no content-security-policy
- https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no content-security-policy
- FoundClickjacking protectionMedium
No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.
- https://arvow.com/ → no x-frame-options
- https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no x-frame-options
- https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no x-frame-options
- https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no x-frame-options
- https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no x-frame-options
- https://arvow.com/autoblog → no x-frame-options
- https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no x-frame-options
- https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no x-frame-options
- https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no x-frame-options
- https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no x-frame-options
- https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no x-frame-options
- https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no x-frame-options
- FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow
No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.
- https://arvow.com/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no x-content-type-options
- https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no x-content-type-options
- https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no x-content-type-options
- https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no x-content-type-options
- https://arvow.com/autoblog → no x-content-type-options
- https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no x-content-type-options
- https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no x-content-type-options
- https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no x-content-type-options
- https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no x-content-type-options
- https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no x-content-type-options
- https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no x-content-type-options
- FoundReferrer policyLow
No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.
- https://arvow.com/ → no referrer-policy
- https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no referrer-policy
- https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no referrer-policy
- https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no referrer-policy
- https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no referrer-policy
- https://arvow.com/autoblog → no referrer-policy
- https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no referrer-policy
- https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no referrer-policy
- https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no referrer-policy
- https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no referrer-policy
- https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no referrer-policy
- https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no referrer-policy
- FoundPermissions policyInfo
No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.
- https://arvow.com/ → no permissions-policy
- https://arvow.com/ai-seo-writer → no permissions-policy
- https://arvow.com/ai-seo-editor → no permissions-policy
- https://arvow.com/ai-news-article-generator → no permissions-policy
- https://arvow.com/youtube-video-to-blog-post → no permissions-policy
- https://arvow.com/autoblog → no permissions-policy
- https://arvow.com/ai-seo-agent → no permissions-policy
- https://arvow.com/google-review-automation → no permissions-policy
- https://arvow.com/gbp-posts-automation → no permissions-policy
- https://arvow.com/ai-seo-chat → no permissions-policy
- https://arvow.com/backlink-exchange → no permissions-policy
- https://arvow.com/llm-visibility-tracker → no permissions-policy
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 4 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- code.iconify.design (40 script tags)
- fast.wistia.com (26 script tags)
- server.fillout.com (1 script tag)
- fast.wistia.net (1 script tag)
9 checks passed
- OKHTTPS
All 733 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKSoftware version disclosure
The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.
- OKCookie flags
All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKForms over HTTPS
45 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.
- OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries
1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
- OKSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
Sites scoring near arvow.com
Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.
- maidensail.comDR 6877/100 · rank 1300 · 200 pages
- avettstudio.lovable.appDR 9177/100 · rank 1300 · 10 pages
- www.boiseanimalhealth.comDR 176/100 · rank 1393 · 8 pages
- www.boise-dentist.comDR 876/100 · rank 1393 · 185 pages
- niwe.caDR 2176/100 · rank 1393 · 90 pages
- intermatic.comDR 6476/100 · rank 1393 · 2,340 pages
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling arvow.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.
Own arvow.com?
- Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
- Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming arvow.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.