Scanned sites / ahrefs.com / 2026-09-13-0238
ahrefs.com scan from 2026-09-13 02:38:46 UTC DR 91
A newer scan exists. See the latest report for ahrefs.com.
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
Scan 2026-09-13-0238
Scanned 2026-09-13 02:38:46 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 12:05:54 UTC. Found with 42backlinks.com tool directory
Site: https://ahrefs.com/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 4993 pages and 1047 assets of ahrefs.com, starting from https://ahrefs.com/. It scored 82 out of 100, a good result. 13 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (53), image alt text (111,757), sitemap coverage (2,251); 5 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), image alt text (−4.1), sitemap coverage (−2.8). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Low1 low finding. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 4993
- Assets fetched
- 1047
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 13 of 27
6,040 of 6,047 discovered URLs were fetched, 7 blocked by robots.txt, 82,976 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 434 link destinations on other sites were checked, 10422 left unchecked.
- Title tags1,156 issues1156 of 2899 pages have title issues. 1846 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−2.4 points
- Meta descriptions1,338 issues1338 of 2899 pages have meta description issues. 1846 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−2.3 points
- Headings14 issues14 of 2899 pages have heading issues. 1846 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Broken links20 issues38 internal links point at 20 broken URLs.−0.1 points
- Links to other sites5 issues5 destinations answered with an error, 87 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 10422 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
- Redirects228 issues225 redirecting URLs, 3 of them chained.−0.2 points
- Non-200 responses23 issues248 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 248 of them are pages, 23 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- Indexability186 issues186 of 4745 indexable pages have indexability warnings.−0.4 points
- Image alt text111,757 issues111757 of 162179 image references have no alt attribute. 1101 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.−4.1 points
- Heavy assets53 issues53 assets larger than 500 KB among 1047 fetched assets. 13 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.−6 points
- Orphan pages4 issues4 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
- Sitemap coverage2,251 issues7 sitemaps listing 1960 URLs: 2250 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap. 1,342 listed URLs not crawled within the 5000-page budget.−2.8 points
- Internal link counts415 notedInternal link counts for 500 pages; 415 worth a look.
- Thin content3 issues3 of 2899 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1846 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Duplicate contentOK0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
- URL format1,748 noted1748 of 4993 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
- Canonicals1,846 noted1846 of 4745 pages have a canonical worth checking.
- Robots directivesOKNo page carries a robots directive; all 4745 pages are open to search engines.
- Anchor text330 noted330 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
- Title and heading structure2,280 noted2280 of 2899 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1846 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Image weight and alt length2,298 noted85 images over 100 KB; 2213 with alt text over 100 characters.
- Response anomalies47 noted47 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
- HTML and head validationNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- hreflangNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Structured dataNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Near duplicatesNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Soft 404s2 noted2 pages answer 200 but say they are not there.
- AccessibilityNot checkedNot checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
- Link positionsNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
- PaginationNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Headers and cookiesOK0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 6040 URLs.
- Orphans in searchNot checkedNot checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
- Link ScoreOKLink Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 4745 pages; 4658 hold almost none (10 or less).
- JavaScript renderingNot checkedNot checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
- PageSpeed Insights5 notedMobile performance 55 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
- SpellingNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
Where this scan sits among all scanned sites
2343 sites, median 79%, average 78%
ahrefs.com scores 82%, higher than 59% of the 2343 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsWritten from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.
The website has multiple SEO issues including broken links, redirect chains, and problems with title tags and meta descriptions. Addressing these can improve site health and search visibility.
- 1
Fix Broken Links
Why: 38 internal links lead to broken URLs, harming user experience and SEO.
How: Identify and replace or remove broken links in your content.
Checks: broken-links
- 2
Resolve Redirect Chains
Why: Chains create unnecessary redirects, affecting load speed and user experience.
How: Simplify redirects to point directly to the final destination URLs.
Checks: redirects
- 3
Address Non-200 Responses
Why: 248 URLs do not return a 2xx response, negatively impacting SEO.
How: Inspect problem URLs and either restore them or implement proper redirects.
Checks: status-codes
- 4
Improve Title Tags
Why: 1155 pages have title issues which can hurt click-through rates.
How: Edit title tags to ensure they are unique and between 30-60 characters.
Checks: titles
- 5
Enhance Meta Descriptions
Why: 1113 pages have meta description issues. Optimized descriptions can boost clicks.
How: Revise meta descriptions to be under 160 characters and relevant to the content.
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 6
Fix Heading Issues
Why: Multiple H1s on 14 pages can confuse search engines about page hierarchy.
How: Ensure each page has one clear H1, with subsequent headings structured logically.
Checks: headings
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlThe website uses third-party scripts without Subresource Integrity (SRI) from potentially vulnerable domains. This could allow malicious alterations. Implementing a Content Security Policy that specifies these hosts can mitigate risks.
- 0 high
- 0 medium
- 1 low
- 0 info
- 1
Third-party Scripts without Subresource IntegrityLow
Why it matters: Scripts from cdn-cookieyes.com and www.googletagmanager.com can be altered, risking compromised content execution.
Fix: Implement a Content Security Policy (CSP) that whitelists these domains to limit script execution to trusted sources.
Evidence: Third-party scripts
What the checks found
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- cdn-cookieyes.com (40 script tags)
- www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
11 checks passed, 4 not applicable
- OKHTTPS
All 4745 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKHTTP Strict Transport Security
strict-transport-security is set on all 4745 HTML pages.
- OKContent Security Policy
A Content-Security-Policy is set.
- OKClickjacking protection
x-frame-options is set on all 4745 HTML pages.
- OKMIME sniffing protection
x-content-type-options is set on all 4745 HTML pages.
- OKSoftware version disclosure
The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKForms over HTTPS
3 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
- OKSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.
- Not applicableReferrer policy
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
- Not applicablePermissions policy
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
- Not applicableCookie flags
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
- Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries
No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
Sites scoring near ahrefs.com
Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.
- www.brightondentalstudio.comDR 584/100 · rank 628 · 111 pages
- xl-storkjokken.noDR 1784/100 · rank 628 · 4,999 pages
- www.beddingtondentalclinic.comDR 784/100 · rank 628 · 161 pages
- workwithmiguel.comDR 084/100 · rank 628 · 5 pages
- tuscanydental.comDR 584/100 · rank 628 · 77 pages
- www.lostcreek.comDR 3384/100 · rank 628 · 78 pages
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling ahrefs.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.
Own ahrefs.com?
- Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
- Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming ahrefs.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.