Scanned sites / absprof.com / 2026-09-13-1112

absprof.com scan from 2026-09-13 11:12:11 UTC DR 10

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-13-1112

Scanned 2026-09-13 11:12:11 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 11:49:07 UTC. Found on page 2 of brave web search results

Site: https://absprof.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

74/ 100Needs work

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 45 pages and 292 assets of absprof.com, starting from https://absprof.com/. It scored 74 out of 100, a result that needs work. 10 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (27), heavy assets (32), broken links (9); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6.5), heavy assets (−6), broken links (−5.5). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
45
Assets fetched
292
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
10 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

337 of 337 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 22 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags10 issues
    10 of 28 pages have title issues. 5 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3 points
  • Meta descriptions27 issues
    27 of 28 pages have meta description issues. 5 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.5 points
  • Headings4 issues
    4 of 28 pages have heading issues. 5 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.7 points
  • Broken links9 issues
    9 internal links point at 9 broken URLs.
    −5.5 points
  • Links to other sites76 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 10 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 22 destinations checked.
  • Redirects3 issues
    4 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses9 issues
    13 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 12 of them are pages, 9 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −2.7 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 31 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 2 pages noindex by design.
    −0.6 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 102 image references have no alt attribute. 5 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets32 issues
    32 assets larger than 500 KB among 292 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.1 points
  • Sitemap coverage3 issues
    3 sitemaps listing 26 URLs: 2 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.5 points
  • Internal link counts3 noted
    Internal link counts for 33 pages; 3 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 28 pages have fewer than 200 words. 5 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format3 noted
    3 of 45 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals5 noted
    5 of 33 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives33 noted
    33 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text9 noted
    9 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure9 noted
    9 of 28 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 5 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length14 noted
    14 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 33 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 337 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 33 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 51 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

absprof.com scores 74%, higher than 26% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 131 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 94 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites74% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The website has several issues that need attention, particularly with broken links, redirects, and missing titles or meta descriptions. Addressing these will improve user experience and SEO performance significantly.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links damage user experience and SEO.

    How: Update or remove the 9 broken internal links identified.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirects

    Why: Redirects can lead to slower page loads and dilute SEO.

    How: Ensure the 4 redirecting URLs point to the correct and intended final URLs.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: Pages returning non-200 responses can't be indexed properly.

    How: Fix the 13 URLs that don't return a 2xx status.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Revise Title Tags

    Why: Improper title lengths can impact click-through rates and SEO.

    How: Shorten the 10 pages with long titles to under 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Missing or long meta descriptions can lower search visibility.

    How: Create or revise the 13 pages with meta description issues.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Correct Heading Issues

    Why: Proper headings improve content structure and SEO.

    How: Fix the 4 pages with multiple H1s or missing H1s.

    Checks: headings

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lacks several important security headers and contains a vulnerable JavaScript library. Implementing these changes will strengthen the site's defenses against various attacks.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, attackers can intercept requests when users access the site without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    No Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: The absence of a CSP allows execution of malicious scripts from any source.

    Fix: Implement a CSP header tailored to your site, for example: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, your site is vulnerable to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Vulnerable JavaScript Library DetectedMedium

    Why it matters: jQuery 2.10.1 has known vulnerabilities that could be exploited depending on implementation.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Not using this header can lead browsers to incorrectly interpret files.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://absprof.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://absprof.com/services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://absprof.com/services/accounting-bookkeeping/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://absprof.com/services/business-gst-personal-taxes/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://absprof.com/services/management-report/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://absprof.com/services/business-planning-financial-projections/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://absprof.com/services/corporate-tax-filing-services-in-canada/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://absprof.com/services/compilation-engagements/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://absprof.com/services/internal-audits/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://absprof.com/services/financial-controllers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://absprof.com/services/cra-e-filer-client-representative/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://absprof.com/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 33 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://absprof.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://absprof.com/services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://absprof.com/services/accounting-bookkeeping/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://absprof.com/services/business-gst-personal-taxes/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://absprof.com/services/management-report/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://absprof.com/services/business-planning-financial-projections/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://absprof.com/services/corporate-tax-filing-services-in-canada/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://absprof.com/services/compilation-engagements/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://absprof.com/services/internal-audits/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://absprof.com/services/financial-controllers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://absprof.com/services/cra-e-filer-client-representative/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://absprof.com/about-us/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://absprof.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://absprof.com/services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://absprof.com/services/accounting-bookkeeping/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://absprof.com/services/business-gst-personal-taxes/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://absprof.com/services/management-report/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://absprof.com/services/business-planning-financial-projections/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://absprof.com/services/corporate-tax-filing-services-in-canada/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://absprof.com/services/compilation-engagements/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://absprof.com/services/internal-audits/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://absprof.com/services/financial-controllers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://absprof.com/services/cra-e-filer-client-representative/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://absprof.com/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://absprof.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://absprof.com/services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://absprof.com/services/accounting-bookkeeping/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://absprof.com/services/business-gst-personal-taxes/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://absprof.com/services/management-report/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://absprof.com/services/business-planning-financial-projections/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://absprof.com/services/corporate-tax-filing-services-in-canada/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://absprof.com/services/compilation-engagements/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://absprof.com/services/internal-audits/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://absprof.com/services/financial-controllers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://absprof.com/services/cra-e-filer-client-representative/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://absprof.com/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 2.10.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 2.10.1 in https://absprof.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jquery.min.…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 4 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (33 script tags)
    • cdn.trustedsite.com (31 script tags)
    • img1.wsimg.com (31 script tags)
    • www.google.com (29 script tags)
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 33 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    19 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near absprof.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling absprof.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own absprof.com?