Scanned sites / lethbridgeelectricians.ca

SEO report for lethbridgeelectricians.ca DR 6

The latest Site Spider scan of lethbridgeelectricians.ca, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/lethbridgeelectricians-ca/2026-09-13-1927.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-13 19:27:58 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 19:34:35 UTC. Found on page 1 of brave web search results

Site: https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

74/ 100Needs work

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 41 pages and 103 assets of lethbridgeelectricians.ca, starting from https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/. It scored 74 out of 100, a result that needs work. 11 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (33), headings (29), sitemap coverage (26); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−7.3), headings (−4.8), sitemap coverage (−4.3). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium5 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
41
Assets fetched
103
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

144 of 148 discovered URLs were fetched, 4 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 30 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags7 issues
    7 of 35 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −1.9 points
  • Meta descriptions33 issues
    33 of 35 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −7.3 points
  • Headings29 issues
    29 of 35 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −4.8 points
  • Broken links3 issues
    3 internal links point at 3 broken URLs.
    −1.7 points
  • Links to other sites1 issue
    1 destination answered with an error, 26 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 30 destinations checked.
    −0.4 points
  • Redirects2 issues
    3 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses3 issues
    6 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 5 of them are pages, 3 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.8 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 36 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.3 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 3 image references have no alt attribute. 3 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 103 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pages25 issues
    25 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −2.8 points
  • Sitemap coverage26 issues
    6 sitemaps listing 34 URLs: 1 crawled page missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 25 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −4.3 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 36 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content9 issues
    9 of 35 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −2 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format6 noted
    6 of 41 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 36 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives36 noted
    36 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor textOK
    Every internal link has descriptive, followed anchor text.
  • Title and heading structure2 noted
    2 of 35 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies2 noted
    2 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404s1 noted
    1 page answer 200 but say they are not there.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 144 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 36 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 60 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

lethbridgeelectricians.ca scores 74%, higher than 26% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites74% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The site has issues with broken links, redirects, non-200 responses, and several SEO elements like titles, meta descriptions, and headings. Prioritize fixing broken links and improving titles and meta descriptions for better visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links harm user experience and SEO.

    How: Update or remove the internal links pointing to broken URLs.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Ensures all pages are accessible and properly indexed.

    How: Investigate and correct the URLs returning non-200 status codes.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Improves search engine visibility and click-through rates.

    How: Shorten titles exceeding 60 characters and address duplicates.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Encourages user engagement and improves CTR.

    How: Revise meta descriptions to be within 160 characters and unique.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add Headings

    Why: Proper headings enhance content structure and SEO.

    How: Add an appropriate H1 heading to pages missing them.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Link Orphan Pages

    Why: Improves site navigation and ensures all content is accessible.

    How: Create internal links to orphaned pages from relevant areas.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site lacks several important security headers and has a vulnerable JavaScript library that could expose it to attacks. Implementing these fixes will improve its security posture significantly.

  • 0 high
  • 5 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks when accessing the site via HTTP.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    No Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of CSP leaves the site exposed to cross-site scripting attacks by allowing scripts from any source.

    Fix: Implement a CSP header like: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' https://trusted.com.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Pages can be embedded in frames on other sites, making them susceptible to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY or use CSP with frame-ancestors directive.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Vulnerable JavaScript Library FoundMedium

    Why it matters: Bootstrap 3.3.7 contains known vulnerabilities that can be exploited depending on usage.

    Fix: Upgrade Bootstrap to at least version 3.4.1 or the latest version.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Exposed Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: A credential-like value can allow misuse or overuse, risking quota limits or unauthorized access.

    Fix: Restrict the API key in the Google Cloud console by HTTP referrer and ensure proper usage.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  6. 6

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Exposing the server version can help attackers identify vulnerabilities associated with that version.

    Fix: Remove or obfuscate the server banner in server configuration.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  7. 7

    Missing Subresource Integrity for Third Party ScriptsLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from third-party domains can alter how the site functions if compromised.

    Fix: Implement a Content-Security-Policy that specifies trusted domains, or use Subresource Integrity (SRI) where possible.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/services/residential-electrical-solutions/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/services/commercial-electrical-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/our-team/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/blog/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/contact/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/SERVICES/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/careers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/our-history/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/wpms-html-sitemap/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 36 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/services/residential-electrical-solutions/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/services/commercial-electrical-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/about-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/our-team/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/SERVICES/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/careers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/our-history/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/wpms-html-sitemap/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/services/residential-electrical-solutions/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/services/commercial-electrical-services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/our-team/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/blog/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/contact/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/SERVICES/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/careers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/our-history/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/wpms-html-sitemap/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: Flywheel/5.1.0 (144 responses)
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: Bootstrap 3.3.7. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • Bootstrap 3.3.7 in https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/wp-content/cache/min/1/wp-content/themes/kall…: CVE-2016-10735, CVE-2018-14040, CVE-2018-14041, CVE-2018-14042, CVE-2019-8331 (XSS through data attributes in tooltip, popover, collapse and scrollspy); fixed in 3.4.1
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…ak (39 chars) in https://lethbridgeelectricians.ca/contact/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • html5shim.googlecode.com (36 script tags)
    • www.google.com (1 script tag)
    • maps.googleapis.com (1 script tag)
6 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 36 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 36 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    5 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of lethbridgeelectricians.ca

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near lethbridgeelectricians.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling lethbridgeelectricians.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own lethbridgeelectricians.ca?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming lethbridgeelectricians.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.